The place of CEUS in distinguishing benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes: a prospective study.

AIMS The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) compared to gray-scale B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound in differentiate benign versus malign superficial cervical lymph nodes. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a prospective study ultrasonography (gray scale, color and spectral Dopller, and CEUS) was performed in 61 patients (33 men, 28 women; mean age of 51.2 years, range: 18-81 years), with cervical lymphadenopathy. The nodes were examined and biopsied or surgically removed. CEUS was performed with 2.4 ml intravenous bolus of contrast agent Sono Vue and the results were registered with a special software. RESULTS Of all the nodes, 32 were benign and 29 were malignant (metastases). Solbiati index was higher in benign nodes (2.23 +/- 0.84 vs 1.50 +/- 0.48, p<0.05). Doppler parameters (vessel location, vascular pattern, pedicullum number, resistivity index, and pulsatility index) were significantly lower in benign nodes (p<0.001), and ROC analysis returned excellent results. For CEUS, derived peak intensity (DPI %) was higher in benign nodes (17.72 +/- 5.43 vs 11.76 +/- 4.88, p<0.05); regional blood volume (RBV) was also higher (849.8 +/- 467.1 vs 458.3 +/- 283.3, p<0.05). The time to peak (TTP, s) and area under the curve (AUC, cm2) were similar in both benign and malignant nodes. Enhancement pattern was the most accurate to characterize benign versus malignant nodes. Sensitivity and specificity were higher for DPI, RBV and enhancement pattern from CEUS, according to ROC analysis, compared to gray scale ultrasound, but lower than color Doppler. Analyzing the place of CEUS in lymph node evaluation we found that CEUS is most useful for the evaluation of the lymph nodes with uncertain aspect at gray scale and Doppler evaluation. CONCLUSIONS ROC analysis confirmed the higher degree of diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in comparison with conventional techniques for some parameters such as enhancement pattern. Evaluation of nodal perfusion with this method can be helpful in the differentiation of benign from malignant nodes but requires further confirmation.

[1]  Y. Ko,et al.  Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Ming Yu,et al.  Clinical Application of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Superficial Lymphadenopathy , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  Y. Ariji,et al.  Power Doppler sonography of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  Hongjia Zhao,et al.  Detecting Metastasis of Lymph Nodes and Predicting Aggressiveness in Patients With Breast Carcinomas , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  F. Candiani,et al.  Sonography of abnormal lymph nodes in vitro: correlation of sonographic and histologic findings. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Roberto Stramare,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterizing lymph nodes with focal cortical thickening in patients with cutaneous melanoma. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part I: normal lymph nodes. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[8]  M. Hendrix,et al.  Alternative vascularization mechanisms in cancer: Pathology and therapeutic implications. , 2007, The American journal of pathology.

[9]  L. Solbiati,et al.  Ultrasonography of the neck. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[10]  S. Dudea,et al.  Ultrasonography of superficial lymph nodes: benign vs. malignant. , 2012, Medical ultrasonography.

[11]  Petr Szturz,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography compared to gray-scale and power doppler in the diagnosis of peripheral lymphadenopathy. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[12]  G. Ott,et al.  Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  C. Dietrich,et al.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between benign and malignant mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes , 2008, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[14]  X. Cui,et al.  New ultrasound techniques for lymph node evaluation. , 2013, World journal of gastroenterology.

[15]  K. Wernecke,et al.  Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US. , 1992, Radiology.

[16]  A. Gadre,et al.  A scanning electron microscope study of the human cervical lymph node. , 1994, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  J Valk,et al.  Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. , 1990, Radiology.

[18]  Stephanie R Wilson,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: what is the evidence and what are the obstacles? , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[20]  A. King,et al.  Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes , 2008, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[21]  P. Wunderbaldinger.  Problems and prospects of modern lymph node imaging. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[22]  L. Solbiati,et al.  Improved characterization of reactive and malignant lymph nodes using contrast-enhanced ultrasound , 2005 .

[23]  F. Ferro,et al.  Evaluation of Lymph Node Perfusion Using Continuous Mode Harmonic Ultrasonography With a Second‐Generation Contrast Agent , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.