Low-complexity Kaczmarz precoding in DL massive MIMO with partial CSI and correlation

Abstract The capacity achieved by three low-complexity precoders is compared considering a single-cell massive MIMO (M-MIMO) broadcast channel; these linear precoders include the conventional zero-forcing (ZF) beamforming, regularized channel inversion (RCI) precoding, and a precoding version based on the iterative randomized Kaczmarz algorithm (rKA). The capacity vs complexity tradeoff is analyzed in the downlink (DL) with a base-station (BS) deploying massive uniform linear array (ULA) antennas, while mobile terminals (MT) are equipped with single-antenna. Based on the precoding matrix associated with each scheme, we first derive the interference matrix and, consequently, the capacity achieved by each analyzed precoder. Numerical results demonstrate that the rKA’s performance-complexity tradeoff is superior compared to conventional ZF and RCI precoding when operating in M-MIMO scenario, since it holds a relative robustness against system loading increasing, appears to be equally efficient under a simple equal power assignment (EPA) policy and implies in a considerably reduced number of complex operations.

[1]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Fundamentals of massive MIMO , 2016, SPAWC.

[2]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Large System Analysis of Linear Precoding in Correlated MISO Broadcast Channels Under Limited Feedback , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  A vector-perturbation technique for near-capacity multiantenna multiuser communication-part I: channel inversion and regularization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[4]  Shi Jin,et al.  Ergodic Secrecy Sum-Rate for Multiuser Downlink Transmission via Regularized Channel Inversion: Large System Analysis , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[5]  Yuejie Chi,et al.  Kaczmarz Method for Solving Quadratic Equations , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[6]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  A Randomized Solver for Linear Systems with Exponential Convergence , 2006, APPROX-RANDOM.

[7]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Linear Precoding Based on Truncated Polynomial Expansion - Part I: Large-Scale Single-Cell Systems , 2013, ArXiv.

[8]  Yi Huang,et al.  Semi-Blind Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation and Channel Equalization , 2015, SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[9]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Large System Analysis of Power Normalization Techniques in Massive MIMO , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Max H. M. Costa,et al.  Writing on dirty paper , 1983, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  R. Couillet,et al.  Random Matrix Methods for Wireless Communications , 2011 .

[12]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of Cellular Networks: How Many Antennas Do We Need? , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Giuseppe Caire,et al.  Low-Complexity Statistically Robust Precoder/Detector Computation for Massive MIMO Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Downlink Precoding With Mixed Statistical and Imperfect Instantaneous CSI for Massive MIMO Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[15]  Deanna Needell,et al.  Stochastic gradient descent, weighted sampling, and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm , 2013, Mathematical Programming.

[16]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Performance of Conjugate and Zero-Forcing Beamforming in Large-Scale Antenna Systems , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  Ami Wiesel,et al.  Zero-Forcing Precoding and Generalized Inverses , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.