Visibility, luminance and vernier acuity

To assess the role of quantal limitations and target visibility on vernier acuity, we measured line detection thresholds and vernier thresholds for abutting dark line targets on a uniform background, for a range of retinal illuminance levels and target contrasts. Measurements were made for stimuli presented at the fovea, and at a retinal eccentricity of 2.5 deg. Although the relationship is truly curvilinear, line detection thresholds and vernier thresholds using targets of a fixed contrast, follow a square-root dependence on retinal illuminance over a significant portion of the illuminance range. Once the effect of retinal illuminance on line detection thresholds has been accounted for, there is little further effect of retinal illuminance on vernier thresholds, at least for visibility levels of up to five times the contrast detection threshold. This finding suggests that the spatial mechanisms which mediate changes in the detection threshold and vernier thresholds for abutting targets are similar, and are limited by the same sources of noise. Vernier thresholds for these thin line targets are approximately inversely proportional to target contrast for both retinal loci, and at all retinal illuminance levels tested. However, vernier thresholds for a constant visibility target are always lower for foveal than for eccentric stimuli, even after the effects of increased spatial pooling with increasing eccentricity are accounted for.

[1]  V. Glezer.  The receptive fields of the retina. , 1965, Vision research.

[2]  M J Morgan,et al.  Vernier acuity predicted from changes in the light distribution of the retinal image. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[3]  G Westheimer,et al.  Contrast and duration of exposure differentially affect vernier and stereoscopic acuity , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  S J Anderson,et al.  Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Temporal and spatial interference with vernier acuity , 1975, Vision Research.

[6]  A. Rose,et al.  Quantum and noise limitations of the visual process. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The relative contributions of pre-neural and neural factors to areal summation in the fovea , 1991, Vision Research.

[8]  H. W. Leibowitz,et al.  Radial Localization of a Single Stimulus as a Function of Luminance and Duration of Exposure , 1955 .

[9]  S. Hecht,et al.  THE VISIBILITY OF SINGLE LINES AT VARIOUS ILLUMINATIONS AND THE RETINAL BASIS OF VISUAL RESOLUTION , 1939, The Journal of general physiology.

[10]  S. Klein,et al.  Sampling in spatial vision , 1986, Nature.

[11]  Thom Carney,et al.  Vernier acuity as line and dipole detection , 1990, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Shapley,et al.  Background light and the contrast gain of primate P and M retinal ganglion cells. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Visibility, timing and vernier acuity , 1993, Vision Research.

[14]  C. H. Graham,et al.  BRIGHTNESS DISCRIMINATION AS A FUNCTION OF THE DURATION OF THE INCREMENT IN INTENSITY , 1938, The Journal of general physiology.

[15]  S. Hecht.  A THEORY OF VISUAL INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION , 1935, The Journal of general physiology.

[16]  Bart Farell,et al.  Vernier acuity: Effects of chromatic content, blur and contrast , 1991, Vision Research.

[17]  H. Bedell,et al.  Precision and accuracy of oculocentric direction for targets of different luminances , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  K. E. Baker,et al.  Some variables influencing vernier acuity. I. Illumination and exposure time. II. Wavelength of illumination , 1949 .

[19]  D. Levi,et al.  Orientation, masking, and vernier acuity for line targets , 1993, Vision Research.

[20]  M. Morgan.  The detection of spatial discontinuities: interactions between contrast and spatial contiguity. , 1986, Spatial vision.

[21]  D. P. Andrews.  Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea part II. Spatial integration , 1967 .

[22]  D M Levi,et al.  Binocular summation in vernier acuity. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  S. Klein,et al.  Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[24]  Ivar Lie,et al.  Visual detection and resolution as a function of adaptation and glare , 1981, Vision Research.

[25]  W. Geisler,et al.  Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  K. E. Baker,et al.  Some variables influencing vernier acuity , 1949 .

[27]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  H Hartridge,et al.  Visual acuity and the resolving power of the eye , 1922, Journal of Physiology.

[29]  W S Geisler,et al.  Physical limits of acuity and hyperacuity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  T. Cohn,et al.  Effect of large spatial uncertainty on foveal luminance increment detectability. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  P. Lennie,et al.  Shared pathways for rod and cone vision , 1986, Vision Research.

[32]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[33]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[34]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Integration regions for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[35]  R. N. Berry,et al.  The relation of vernier and depth discriminations to field brightness. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1985, Vision Research.

[38]  S. Klein,et al.  The role of local contrast in the visual deficits of humans with naturally occurring amblyopia , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Some factors influencing the variability of vernier adjustments. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[40]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Peripheral positional acuity: Retinal and cortical constraints on 2-dot separation discrimination under photopic and scotopic conditions , 1989, Vision Research.

[41]  B. Boycott,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate , 1990, Vision Research.

[42]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Acuities for spatial arrangement in line figures: human and ideal observers compared. , 1973, Vision research.

[43]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Visibility and vernier acuity for separated targets , 1993, Vision Research.

[44]  H. Barlow.  Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  W. Geisler.  Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. , 1989 .

[46]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Regional distribution of the mechanisms that underlie spatial localization , 1990, Vision Research.

[47]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatial Modulation Transfer in the Human Eye , 1967 .

[48]  N. Graham,et al.  Quantal noise and decision rules in dynamic models of light adaptation , 1992, Vision Research.

[49]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Model of peripheral and amblyopic hyperacuity , 1991, Vision Research.

[50]  H. Vries.  The quantum character of light and its bearing upon threshold of vision, the differential sensitivity and visual acuity of the eye , 1943 .

[51]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[52]  Jaj Jacques Roufs.  On the relation between the treshold of short flashes, the flicker fusion frequency and the visual latency , 1966 .

[53]  M. J. Morgan,et al.  Positional acuity with chromatic stimuli , 1985, Vision Research.

[54]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[55]  A. Rose.  The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[56]  R. Watt,et al.  Spatial filters and the localization of luminance changes in human vision , 1984, Vision Research.

[57]  B. Skottun,et al.  Effects of contrast and spatial frequency on vernier acuity , 1987, Vision Research.

[58]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.