A Multiple Models Approach to Assessing Recidivism Risk

This study used a large recidivism data set to develop and validate a multiple models tool for predicting recidivism risk. Consistent with prior research, the authors found that the multiple models tool was more accurate than tools built using the traditional single-model approach. In addition, they demonstrated that the predicted recidivism rates produced by the multiple models tool could be summarized in a usable format consisting of four to five statistically distinct risk classes offering an impressive degree of base-rate dispersion. Given that public protection ranks as a primary focal concern of judges, the authors believe that their results justify renewed attention to the potential uses of actuarial tools within the context of judicial decision making.

[1]  Lloyd E. Ohlin,et al.  Selection for parole , 1952 .

[2]  Selection for Parole , 1952 .

[3]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[4]  Barbara D. Underwood,et al.  Law and the Crystal Ball: Predicting Behavior with Statistical Inference and Individualized Judgment , 1979 .

[5]  N. Morris,et al.  Crime and justice : an annual review of research , 1980 .

[6]  L. Delbeke Quasi-experimentation - design and analysis issues for field settings - cook,td, campbell,dt , 1980 .

[7]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  Decisionmaking in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion , 1980 .

[8]  J. Monahan Predicting Violent Behavior: An Assessment of Clinical Techniques , 1981 .

[9]  A Villers Ruiz,et al.  Statistical package for the social sciences (spss) , 1981 .

[10]  Selective Incapacitation: Sentencing According to Risk , 1983 .

[11]  Jacqueline Cohen,et al.  Incapacitation as a Strategy for Crime Control: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 1983, Crime and Justice.

[12]  Peter B. Hoffman,et al.  Screening for risk: A revised salient factor score (SFS 81) , 1983 .

[13]  J. Chaiken,et al.  Offender Types and Public Policy , 1984 .

[14]  Michael G. Janus,et al.  Selective incapacitation: Have we tried it? Does it work? , 1985 .

[15]  S. D. Gottfredson,et al.  Selective Incapacitation? , 1985 .

[16]  D. Farrington,et al.  Prediction in criminology , 1986 .

[17]  M. Tonry Prediction and Classification: Legal and Ethical Issues , 1987, Crime and Justice.

[18]  J. Petersilia,et al.  Guideline-Based Justice: Prediction and Racial Minorities , 1987, Crime and Justice.

[19]  Tim Brennan,et al.  Classification: An Overview of Selected Methodological Issues , 1987, Crime and Justice.

[20]  Don M. Gottfredson,et al.  Prediction and Classification in Criminal Justice Decision Making , 1987, Crime and Justice.

[21]  D. Gottfredson,et al.  Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making. , 1989 .

[22]  Jeffrey A. Roth,et al.  Understanding and Preventing Violence , 1992 .

[23]  Paul S Appelbaum,et al.  Is it unethical to offer predictions of future violence? , 1992, Law and human behavior.

[24]  Christopher D. Webster,et al.  The dimensions of dangerousness revisited , 1994 .

[25]  Don M. Gottfredson,et al.  BEHAVIORAL PREDICTION AND THE PROBLEM OF INCAPACITATION , 1994 .

[26]  P. Meehl,et al.  Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. , 1996 .

[27]  W. R. Smith The effects of base rate and cutoff point choice on commonly used measures of association and accuracy in recidivism research , 1996 .

[28]  Jeffery T. Ulmer,et al.  COURT COMMUNITIES UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: DILEMMAS OF FORMAL RATIONALITY AND SENTENCING DISPARITY , 1996 .

[29]  William M. Grove,et al.  Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures , 1996 .

[30]  P. Appelbaum Almost a revolution: an international perspective on the law of involuntary commitment. , 1997, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[31]  D. R. Smith,et al.  The consequences of error: Recidivism prediction and civil-libertarian ratios , 1998 .

[32]  J. Monahan,et al.  Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. , 1998, Archives of general psychiatry.

[33]  K. Heilbrun Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. , 1998 .

[34]  Darrell J. Steffensmeier,et al.  The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male , 1998 .

[35]  Kathleen Auerhahn SELECTIVE INCAPACITATION AND THE PROBLEM OF PREDICTION , 1999 .

[36]  J. Monahan,et al.  Assessing Violence Risk Among Discharged Psychiatric Patients: Toward an Ecological Approach , 1999, Law and human behavior.

[37]  Eric Silver,et al.  Constructing Actuarial Devices for Predicting Recidivism , 2000 .

[38]  Darrell J. Steffensmeier,et al.  Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[39]  J. Monahan,et al.  Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk , 2000, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[40]  J. Monahan,et al.  A Classification Tree Approach to the Development of Actuarial Violence Risk Assessment Tools , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[41]  J A Swets,et al.  Psychological Science Can Improve Diagnostic Decisions , 2000, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[42]  EXTENDING SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF VIOLENCE AMONG PERSONS WITH MENTAL ILLNESSES , 2000 .

[43]  J. Monahan,et al.  Rethinking Risk Assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence , 2001 .

[44]  Eric Silver,et al.  A Cautionary Note on the Use of Actuarial Risk Assessment Tools for Social Control , 2002 .