Structure-based systems biology for analyzing off-target binding.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Girolami,et al. Inferring Signaling Pathway Topologies from Multiple Perturbation Measurements of Specific Biochemical Species , 2010, Science Signaling.
[2] Xavier Barril,et al. Ensemble Docking from Homology Models. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[3] Bin Chen,et al. Gaining Insight into Off-Target Mediated Effects of Drug Candidates with a Comprehensive Systems Chemical Biology Analysis , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[4] Stefan Wetzel,et al. Bioactivity-guided mapping and navigation of chemical space. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[5] K. Dill,et al. Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.
[6] D. Busam,et al. An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2008, Science.
[7] K. Sharp,et al. On the calculation of absolute macromolecular binding free energies , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Computational evaluation of protein-small molecule binding. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.
[9] R. Jackson,et al. Homology-modelling protein-ligand interactions: allowing for ligand-induced conformational change. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.
[10] Régis Pomès,et al. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy using distributed replica sampling. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.
[11] Y.Z. Chen,et al. Ligand–protein inverse docking and its potential use in the computer search of protein targets of a small molecule , 2001, Proteins.
[12] Robert B. Russell,et al. SuperTarget and Matador: resources for exploring drug-target relationships , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[13] Philip E. Bourne,et al. Functional Coverage of the Human Genome by Existing Structures, Structural Genomics Targets, and Homology Models , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[14] T. Scior,et al. Application of drug repositioning strategy to TOFISOPAM. , 2008, Current medicinal chemistry.
[15] Didier Rognan,et al. How to Measure the Similarity Between Protein Ligand-Binding Sites? , 2008 .
[16] Graham M. West,et al. Quantitative proteomics approach for identifying protein–drug interactions in complex mixtures using protein stability measurements , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] B. Palsson,et al. Genome-scale reconstruction of the metabolic network in Staphylococcus aureus N315: an initial draft to the two-dimensional annotation , 2005, BMC Microbiology.
[18] D. Diller,et al. Kinases, homology models, and high throughput docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] Jie Liang,et al. Predicting Protein Function and Binding Profile via Matching of Local Evolutionary and Geometric Surface Patterns , 2009 .
[20] E. Fraenkel,et al. Integrating Proteomic, Transcriptional, and Interactome Data Reveals Hidden Components of Signaling and Regulatory Networks , 2009, Science Signaling.
[21] T. Klabunde,et al. Structure-based drug discovery using GPCR homology modeling: successful virtual screening for antagonists of the alpha1A adrenergic receptor. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[22] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Nuclear hormone receptor targeted virtual screening. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[23] K. Shokat,et al. Targeting the cancer kinome through polypharmacology , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[24] Tobias Müller,et al. Identifying functional modules in protein–protein interaction networks: an integrated exact approach , 2008, ISMB.
[25] B. Druker,et al. Lessons learned from the development of an abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor for chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.
[26] Daniel L Baker,et al. Virtual screening approaches for the identification of non-lipid autotaxin inhibitors. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[27] Rommie E. Amaro,et al. An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[28] J. Skolnick,et al. A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] E. Kunkel. Systems biology in drug discovery , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[30] Markus Fischer,et al. Structural relationships among proteins with different global topologies and their implications for function annotation strategies , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[31] Z. Xiang,et al. Advances in homology protein structure modeling. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.
[32] M. Cyert,et al. Cracking the Phosphatase Code: Docking Interactions Determine Substrate Specificity , 2009, Science Signaling.
[33] Paul A Clemons,et al. The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease , 2006, Science.
[34] Eytan Ruppin,et al. Integrating quantitative proteomics and metabolomics with a genome-scale metabolic network model , 2010, Bioinform..
[35] Stefan Wetzel,et al. Interactive exploration of chemical space with Scaffold Hunter. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[36] Yang Zhang,et al. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.
[37] Philip E. Bourne,et al. A Multidimensional Strategy to Detect Polypharmacological Targets in the Absence of Structural and Sequence Homology , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[38] T. Bishop,et al. Homology modeling using multiple molecular dynamics simulations and docking studies of the human androgen receptor ligand binding domain bound to testosterone and nonsteroidal ligands. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[39] D. Lauffenburger,et al. Discrete logic modelling as a means to link protein signalling networks with functional analysis of mammalian signal transduction , 2009, Molecular systems biology.
[40] Didier Rognan,et al. Protein‐based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of g‐protein coupled receptors suitable targets? , 2002, Proteins.
[41] R. Sharan,et al. Toward accurate reconstruction of functional protein networks , 2009, Molecular systems biology.
[42] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Binding mode of ecdysone agonists to the receptor: comparative modeling and docking studies , 2003, Journal of molecular modeling.
[43] B. Stockwell,et al. Multicomponent therapeutics for networked systems , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[44] B. Rost. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. , 1999, Protein engineering.
[45] Jie Liang,et al. Inferring functional relationships of proteins from local sequence and spatial surface patterns. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[46] M. Gilson,et al. Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[47] V. Nizet,et al. A cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitor blocks Staphylococcus aureus virulence. , 2008, Science.
[48] K. Fidelis,et al. Generalized modeling of enzyme–ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures , 2006, Proteins.
[49] R. Solé,et al. Data completeness—the Achilles heel of drug-target networks , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.
[50] Anna Vulpetti,et al. Predicting Polypharmacology by Binding Site Similarity: From Kinases to the Protein Universe , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[51] John P. Overington,et al. Genomic-scale prioritization of drug targets: the TDR Targets database , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[52] G. Müller,et al. Medicinal chemistry of target family-directed masterkeys. , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[53] J. Andrew McCammon,et al. Discovery of drug-like inhibitors of an essential RNA-editing ligase in Trypanosoma brucei , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[54] J. Whisstock,et al. Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.
[55] Kevin Y. Yip,et al. Extensive In Vivo Metabolite-Protein Interactions Revealed by Large-Scale Systematic Analyses , 2010, Cell.
[56] A. Barabasi,et al. Blueprint for antimicrobial hit discovery targeting metabolic networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[57] Alla Karnovsky,et al. A class of selective antibacterials derived from a protein kinase inhibitor pharmacophore , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[58] Markus J. Herrgård,et al. Network-based prediction of human tissue-specific metabolism , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.
[59] Ines Thiele,et al. Three-Dimensional Structural View of the Central Metabolic Network of Thermotoga maritima , 2009, Science.
[60] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches. , 2007, Drug discovery today.
[61] Michal Brylinski,et al. FINDSITELHM: A Threading-Based Approach to Ligand Homology Modeling , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[62] B. Roux,et al. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[63] Michael K. Gilson,et al. Screening Drug-Like Compounds by Docking to Homology Models: A Systematic Study , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[64] A. Hopkins,et al. The druggable genome , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[65] Anna K. Schrey,et al. Capture compound mass spectrometry sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of liver toxicity of two Parkinson drugs. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[66] M. Carroll,et al. CGP 57148, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibits the growth of cells expressing BCR-ABL, TEL-ABL, and TEL-PDGFR fusion proteins. , 1997, Blood.
[67] Adrian H Elcock,et al. Progress toward virtual screening for drug side effects , 2002, Proteins.
[68] Philip E. Bourne,et al. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drugome and Its Polypharmacological Implications , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[69] G. Klebe,et al. Unexpected nanomolar inhibition of carbonic anhydrase by COX-2-selective celecoxib: new pharmacological opportunities due to related binding site recognition. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[70] A. Hopkins. Network pharmacology , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[71] K. Dill,et al. Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get". , 2009, Structure.
[72] G. V. Paolini,et al. Global mapping of pharmacological space , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.
[73] E. Bradley,et al. Performance of 3D-database molecular docking studies into homology models. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[74] A. Schuffenhauer,et al. Charting biologically relevant chemical space: a structural classification of natural products (SCONP). , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[75] Zhaohui S. Qin,et al. A Global Protein Kinase and Phosphatase Interaction Network in Yeast , 2010, Science.
[76] D. Licatalosi,et al. Integrative Modeling Defines the Nova Splicing-Regulatory Network and Its Combinatorial Controls , 2010, Science.
[77] A. Barabasi,et al. Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[78] A. Fliri,et al. Biospectra analysis: model proteome characterizations for linking molecular structure and biological response. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[79] P. Ridker,et al. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Statins: Clinical Evidence and Basic Mechanisms , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[80] B. Palsson,et al. Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.
[81] Gary An,et al. Closing the Scientific Loop: Bridging Correlation and Causality in the Petaflop Age , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.
[82] Lin He,et al. Harvesting Candidate Genes Responsible for Serious Adverse Drug Reactions from a Chemical-Protein Interactome , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[83] Sebastian Radestock,et al. Homology Model-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands Using Docking and Target-Biased Scoring , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[84] R Abagyan,et al. Discovery of antiandrogen activity of nonsteroidal scaffolds of marketed drugs , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[85] Mehmet Koyutürk,et al. An Integrative -omics Approach to Identify Functional Sub-Networks in Human Colorectal Cancer , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[86] Philip E. Bourne,et al. Drug Discovery Using Chemical Systems Biology: Identification of the Protein-Ligand Binding Network To Explain the Side Effects of CETP Inhibitors , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[87] M. Belvin,et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth , 2010, Nature.
[88] P. Clemons,et al. Chemogenomic data analysis: prediction of small-molecule targets and the advent of biological fingerprint. , 2007, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[89] Lei Xie,et al. Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile–profile alignments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[90] P. Sorger,et al. Systems biology and combination therapy in the quest for clinical efficacy , 2006, Nature chemical biology.
[91] Philip E. Bourne,et al. Drug Discovery Using Chemical Systems Biology: Repositioning the Safe Medicine Comtan to Treat Multi-Drug and Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[92] B. Shoichet,et al. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[93] Philip E. Bourne,et al. Drug Off-Target Effects Predicted Using Structural Analysis in the Context of a Metabolic Network Model , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[94] Jian Wang,et al. In Silico Elucidation of the Molecular Mechanism Defining the Adverse Effect of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[95] Monica L. Mo,et al. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[96] Angelo D. Favia,et al. Protein promiscuity and its implications for biotechnology , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.
[97] R. Nussinov,et al. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.
[98] K. Rasmussen. Creating more effective antidepressants: clues from the clinic. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[99] S. Pongor,et al. Multiple weak hits confuse complex systems: a transcriptional regulatory network as an example. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[100] Corey Nislow,et al. Combination chemical genetics. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.
[101] P. Kollman,et al. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.
[102] H. Kitano. A robustness-based approach to systems-oriented drug design , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[103] Martin Zacharias,et al. In silico prediction of binding sites on proteins. , 2010, Current medicinal chemistry.
[104] Edgar Jacoby,et al. Evaluation of the utility of homology models in high throughput docking , 2007, Journal of molecular modeling.
[105] Alasdair T. R. Laurie,et al. Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.
[106] J. Lehár,et al. Multi-target therapeutics: when the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. , 2007, Drug discovery today.
[107] Jordi Mestres,et al. Computational chemogenomics approaches to systematic knowledge-based drug discovery. , 2004, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[108] Xiaohua Ma,et al. Mechanisms of drug combinations: interaction and network perspectives , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[109] N. Chandra,et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis interactome analysis unravels potential pathways to drug resistance , 2008, BMC Microbiology.
[110] Russell L. Marsden,et al. Progress of structural genomics initiatives: an analysis of solved target structures. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[111] Bin Fang,et al. A chemical and phosphoproteomic characterization of dasatinib action in lung cancer , 2010, Nature chemical biology.
[112] Chao Zhang,et al. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signaling in cells with wild-type BRAF , 2010, Nature.
[113] Michael A. White,et al. Use of Data-Biased Random Walks on Graphs for the Retrieval of Context-Specific Networks from Genomic Data , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[114] Adam M. Feist,et al. Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.
[115] U. Alon,et al. The incoherent feedforward loop can provide fold-change detection in gene regulation. , 2009, Molecular cell.
[116] T. Henzinger,et al. Executable cell biology , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[117] J. Reis-Filho,et al. Kinase-Dead BRAF and Oncogenic RAS Cooperate to Drive Tumor Progression through CRAF , 2010, Cell.
[118] Raquel Norel,et al. Protein interface conservation across structure space , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[119] F. Cohen,et al. Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[120] Justin Lamb,et al. The Connectivity Map: a new tool for biomedical research , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[121] J. Lehár,et al. High-order combination effects and biological robustness , 2008, Molecular systems biology.
[122] Rommie E. Amaro,et al. Ensemble-Based Virtual Screening Reveals Potential Novel Antiviral Compounds for Avian Influenza Neuraminidase , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[123] Lea Goentoro,et al. Evidence that fold-change, and not absolute level, of beta-catenin dictates Wnt signaling. , 2009, Molecular cell.
[124] P. Bork,et al. Drug Target Identification Using Side-Effect Similarity , 2008, Science.
[125] Gerhard Klebe,et al. An old target revisited: two new privileged skeletons and an unexpected binding mode for HIV-protease inhibitors. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.
[126] Hiroyuki Kurata,et al. Genetic modification of flux for flux prediction of mutants , 2009, Bioinform..
[127] Michal Brylinski,et al. Q‐DockLHM: Low‐resolution refinement for ligand comparative modeling , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[128] Bryan L. Roth,et al. Finding New Tricks For Old Drugs: An Efficient Route For Public-Sector Drug Discovery , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[129] Philip E. Bourne,et al. Modern proteomes contain putative imprints of ancient shifts in trace metal geochemistry , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[130] Gerhard Klebe,et al. Molecular Docking Screens Using Comparative Models of Proteins , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[131] G. Parmigiani,et al. Core Signaling Pathways in Human Pancreatic Cancers Revealed by Global Genomic Analyses , 2008, Science.
[132] Herbert Waldmann,et al. Protein Structure Similarity as Guiding Principle for Combinatorial Library Design , 2003, Biological chemistry.
[133] David Warde-Farley,et al. Dynamic modularity in protein interaction networks predicts breast cancer outcome , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.
[134] Stéphanie Pérot,et al. Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery. , 2010, Drug discovery today.
[135] Qing Zhang,et al. The RCSB Protein Data Bank: a redesigned query system and relational database based on the mmCIF schema , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[136] Mindy I. Davis,et al. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.
[137] Ying Sun,et al. A nonsynonymous SNP in human cytosolic sialidase in a small Asian population results in reduced enzyme activity: potential link with severe adverse reactions to oseltamivir , 2007, Cell Research.
[138] Keshava Rajagopal,et al. Teaching old receptors new tricks: biasing seven-transmembrane receptors , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[139] Jun Wang,et al. Protein and small molecule microarrays: powerful tools for high-throughput proteomics. , 2006, Molecular bioSystems.
[140] Michael J. Keiser,et al. Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[141] Mehmet Koyutürk. Algorithmic and analytical methods in network biology , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.
[142] A. Singleton,et al. Rare Structural Variants Disrupt Multiple Genes in Neurodevelopmental Pathways in Schizophrenia , 2008, Science.
[143] Steven A Carr,et al. Identifying the proteins to which small-molecule probes and drugs bind in cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[144] M. Girolami,et al. Inferring Signaling Pathway Topologies from Multiple Perturbation Measurements of Specific Biochemical Species , 2010, Science Signaling.
[145] Adrian H Elcock,et al. Structure selection for protein kinase docking and virtual screening: homology models or crystal structures? , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.
[146] Solomon Nwaka,et al. Innovative lead discovery strategies for tropical diseases , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[147] Daniel E. Newburger,et al. Diversity and Complexity in DNA Recognition by Transcription Factors , 2009, Science.
[148] J. Skolnick,et al. Cross-reactivity virtual profiling of the human kinome by X-react(KIN): a chemical systems biology approach. , 2010, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[149] Bin Chen,et al. Chem2Bio2RDF: a semantic framework for linking and data mining chemogenomic and systems chemical biology data , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[150] G. Schneider,et al. Model structure of APOBEC3C reveals a binding pocket modulating ribonucleic acid interaction required for encapsidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[151] Janet M Thornton,et al. Protein function prediction using local 3D templates. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[152] Yi Wang,et al. In silico search of putative adverse drug reaction related proteins as a potential tool for facilitating drug adverse effect prediction. , 2006, Toxicology letters.
[153] Jonathan C. Horton,et al. What you see ... , 2001, Nature.
[154] James E Ferrell,et al. Signaling motifs and Weber's law. , 2009, Molecular cell.