Irreversibility in unbranched pathways: preferred positions based on regulatory considerations.

It has been observed experimentally that most unbranched biosynthetic pathways have irreversible reactions near their beginning, many times at the first step. If there were no functional reasons for this fact, then one would expect irreversible reactions to be equally distributed among all positions in such pathways. Since this is not the case, we have attempted to identify functional consequences of having an irreversible reaction early in the pathway. We systematically varied the position of the irreversible reaction in model pathways and compared the resulting systemic behavior according to several criteria for functional effectiveness, using the method of mathematically controlled comparisons. This technique minimizes extraneous differences in systemic behavior and identifies those that are fundamental. Our results show that a pathway with an irreversible reaction located at the first step, and with all other reactions reversible, is on average better than an otherwise equivalent pathway with all reactions reversible, which in turn is on average better than an otherwise equivalent pathway with an irreversible reaction located at any step other than the first. Pathways with an irreversible first reaction and low concentrations of intermediates (one of the primary criteria for functional effectiveness) exhibit the following profile when compared to fully reversible pathways: changes in the concentration of intermediates in response to changes in the level of initial substrate are equally low, the robustness of the intermediate concentrations and of the flux is similar, the margins of stability are similar, flux is more responsive to changes in demand for end product, intermediate concentrations are less responsive to changes in demand for end product, and transient times are shorter. These results provide a functional rationale for the positioning of irreversible reactions at the beginning of unbranched biosynthetic pathways.

[1]  J. Changeux,et al.  Allosteric proteins and cellular control systems. , 1963, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Rui Alves,et al.  Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons , 2000, Bioinform..

[3]  R Heinrich,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of enzyme kinetic parameters; effect of constraints. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  P. Crowley Natural selection and the Michaelis constant. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  G. Pettersson A new approach for determination of the selectively favoured kinetic design of enzyme reactions. , 1996, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[6]  Rui Alves,et al.  Comparing systemic properties of ensembles of biological networks by graphical and statistical methods , 2000, Bioinform..

[7]  Thomas Wilhelm,et al.  An evolutionary approach to enzyme kinetics: Optimization of ordered mechanisms , 1994 .

[8]  M A Savageau Optimal design of feedback control by inhibition: dynamic considerations. , 1975, Journal of molecular evolution.

[9]  M A Savageau,et al.  The tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum. II. Evaluation of model consistency and robustness. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Kinetic parameters of enzymatic reactions in states of maximal activity; an evolutionary approach. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  M A Savageau,et al.  Effect of overall feedback inhibition in unbranched biosynthetic pathways. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Naresh K. Sinha,et al.  Modern Control Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  R Heinrich,et al.  Control analysis of unbranched enzymatic chains in states of maximal activity. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  M A Savageau,et al.  Network regulation of the immune response: alternative control points for suppressor modulation of effector lymphocytes. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[15]  S. Waley,et al.  A note on the kinetics of multi-enzyme systems. , 1964, The Biochemical journal.

[16]  S. Schuster,et al.  Time hierarchy in enzymatic reaction chains resulting from optimality principles. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Rodney L. Levine,et al.  Modulation by molecular interactions , 1985 .

[18]  Rui Alves,et al.  Systemic properties of ensembles of metabolic networks: application of graphical and statistical methods to simple unbranched pathways , 2000, Bioinform..

[19]  G Pettersson,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of the catalytic efficiency of enzymes. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[20]  P. Srere,et al.  Complexes of sequential metabolic enzymes. , 1987, Annual review of biochemistry.

[21]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[22]  A. Cornish-Bowden The effect of natural selection on enzymic catalysis. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  M. Mavrovouniotis,et al.  Enzymatic reaction rate limits with constraints on equilibrium constants and experimental parameters. , 1998, Bio Systems.

[24]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Completely uncoupled and perfectly coupled gene expression in repressible systems. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Richard C. Dorf,et al.  Modern Control Systems, 6th Ed. , 1991 .

[26]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  ESTIMATION OF UPPER BOUNDS FOR THE RATES OF ENZYMATIC REACTIONS , 1990 .

[27]  S. Schuster,et al.  The modelling of metabolic systems. Structure, control and optimality. , 1998, Bio Systems.

[28]  A Sorribas,et al.  Strategies for representing metabolic pathways within biochemical systems theory: reversible pathways. , 1989, Mathematical biosciences.

[29]  Daniel E. Atkinson,et al.  Limitation of Metabolite Concentrations and the Conservation of Solvent Capacity in the Living Cell , 1969 .

[30]  M A Savageau,et al.  Concepts relating the behavior of biochemical systems to their underlying molecular properties. , 1971, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[31]  K. F. Tipton,et al.  Biochemical systems analysis: A study of function and design in molecular biology , 1978 .

[32]  M. Savageau,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity as a Criterion for Evaluating and Comparing the Performance of Biochemical Systems , 1971, Nature.

[33]  A. Pardee,et al.  Control of pyrimidine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli by a feed-back mechanism. , 1956, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[34]  H. E. Umbarger,et al.  Evidence for a negative-feedback mechanism in the biosynthesis of isoleucine. , 1956, Science.

[35]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  M A Savageau,et al.  Feedfoward inhibition in biosynthetic pathways: inhibition of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by intermediates of the pathway. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  A. Fersht,et al.  Catalysis, binding and enzyme-substrate complementarity , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[38]  J. Knowles,et al.  Evolution of enzyme function and the development of catalytic efficiency. , 1976, Biochemistry.

[39]  J. Collado-Vides Integrative Approaches to Molecular Biology , 1996 .