Chromosome 8p Deletions and 8q Gains are Associated with Tumor Progression and Poor Prognosis in Prostate Cancer

Purpose: Deletions of 8p and gains of 8q belong to the most frequent cytogenetic alterations in prostate cancer. The target genes of these alterations and their biological significance are unknown. Experimental Design: To determine the relationship between chromosome 8 changes, and prostate cancer phenotype and prognosis, a set of 1.954 fully annotated prostate cancers were analyzed in a tissue microarray format by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results: Both 8p deletions and 8q gains increased in number during different stages of prostate cancer progression. 8p deletions/8q gains were found in 26.1%/4.8% of 1,239 pT2 cancers, 38.5%/9.8% of 379 pT3a cancers, 43.5%/8.9% of 237 pT3b cancers, 40.7%/14.8% of 27 pT4 cancers, 39.1%/34.8% of 23 nodal metastases, 51.9%/33.3% of 27 bone metastases, and 45.5%/59.9% of 22 hormone refractory cancers (P < 0.0001 each). Both 8p deletions and 8q gains were also significantly associated with high Gleason grade and with each other (P < 0.0001 each). In primary tumors, 8p deletions were seen in only 27.3% of 1,882 cancers without 8q gain but in 57.4% of 122 tumors with 8q gain (P < 0.0001). Among cancers treated with radical prostatectomy, 8p deletions (P = 0.003) and 8q gains (P = 0.02) were associated with biochemical tumor recurrence. However, multivariate analysis (including prostate-specific antigen, pT/pN stage, Gleason score, and surgical margin status) did not reveal any statistically independent effect of 8p or 8q alterations on biochemical tumor recurrence. Conclusions: 8p deletions and 8q gains are relatively rare in early stage prostate cancer but often develop during tumor progression. The prognostic effect does not seem to be strong enough to warrant clinical application. Clin Cancer Res; 16(1); 56–64

[1]  F. Harrell,et al.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests. , 1982, JAMA.

[2]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  R. Bookstein,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization, allelic imbalance, and fluorescence in situ hybridization on chromosome 8 in prostate cancer , 1994, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[4]  T. Visakorpi,et al.  Genetic changes in primary and recurrent prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1995, Cancer research.

[5]  T. Hudson,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization evaluation of chromosome deletion patterns in prostate cancer. , 1996, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  D. Schaid,et al.  Allelic imbalance and microsatellite instability in prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1996, Cancer research.

[7]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[8]  P. Carroll,et al.  Genetic alterations in untreated metastases and androgen-independent prostate cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization and allelotyping. , 1996, Cancer research.

[9]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Interphase cytogenetics of prostatic tumor progression: specific chromosomal abnormalities are involved in metastasis to the bone. , 1997, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[10]  R. Dahiya,et al.  High frequency of genetic instability of microsatellites in human prostatic adenocarcinoma , 1997, International journal of cancer.

[11]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Detection of c-myc oncogene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in metastatic prostatic carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1997, Cancer research.

[12]  T. Visakorpi,et al.  Genetic alterations in hormone-refractory recurrent prostate carcinomas. , 1998, The American journal of pathology.

[13]  T C Gasser,et al.  Survey of gene amplifications during prostate cancer progression by high-throughout fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. , 1999, Cancer research.

[14]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Clinical significance of alterations of chromosome 8 in high-grade, advanced, nonmetastatic prostate carcinoma. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  H. Tanke,et al.  Identification of Genetic Markers for Prostatic Cancer Progression , 2000, Laboratory Investigation.

[16]  R. Simon,et al.  Comparative methodological analysis of erbB‐2/HER‐2 gene dosage, chromosomal copy number and protein overexpression in breast carcinoma tissues for diagnostic use , 2000, Histopathology.

[17]  Y. Kubota,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization evaluation of c‐myc and androgen receptor gene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in prostate cancer in Japanese patients , 2000, The Prostate.

[18]  H. Moch,et al.  Genetic changes in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. , 2000, Urology.

[19]  J. Macoska,et al.  8p22 loss concurrent with 8c gain is associated with poor outcome in prostate cancer. , 2000, Urology.

[20]  H. Tanke,et al.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of prostatic adenocarcinomas from screening studies : early cancers may contain aggressive genetic features. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[21]  H. Moch,et al.  Tissue microarrays for rapid linking of molecular changes to clinical endpoints. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[22]  H. Moch,et al.  Discovery of new DNA amplification loci in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization * , 2001, The Prostate.

[23]  F. Kishi,et al.  Two putative tumor suppressor genes on chromosome arm 8p may play different roles in prostate cancer. , 2001, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[24]  E. Bergstralh,et al.  Clinical significance of alterations of chromosome 8 detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in pathologic organ‐confined prostate cancer , 2002, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[25]  M. Graefen,et al.  Tumour grade, proliferation, apoptosis, microvessel density, p53, and bcl-2 in prostate cancers: differences between tumours located in the transition zone and in the peripheral zone. , 2002, European urology.

[26]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Loss of p53 and c-myc Overrepresentation in Stage T2-3N1-3M0 Prostate Cancer are Potential Markers for Cancer Progression , 2002, Modern Pathology.

[27]  T. Mattfeldt,et al.  Genetic changes in stage pT2N0 prostate cancer studied by comparative genomic hybridization , 2002, BJU international.

[28]  K. Pienta,et al.  Tissue Microarray Sampling Strategy for Prostate Cancer Biomarker Analysis , 2002, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[29]  Ronald Simon,et al.  Tissue microarrays in cancer diagnosis , 2003, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[30]  U. Bergerheim,et al.  The role of chromosome 8p22 deletion for predicting disease progression and pathological staging in prostate cancer. , 2003, Aktuelle Urologie.

[31]  T. Furuya,et al.  DNA sequence copy number aberrations in prostate cancers: a comparison of comparative genomic hybridization data between Japan and European countries. , 2004, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[32]  R. Lothe,et al.  Genomic analysis of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained via ultrasound‐guided needle biopsy may be of use in preoperative decision‐making , 2004, Cancer.

[33]  Holger Sültmann,et al.  Extraction and processing of high quality RNA from impalpable and macroscopically invisible prostate cancer for microarray gene expression analysis. , 2005, International journal of oncology.

[34]  K. Das,et al.  Chromosomal changes in prostate cancer: A fluorescence in situ hybridization study , 2005, Clinical genetics.

[35]  G. Sauter,et al.  Tissue microarrays for comparing molecular features with proliferation activity in breast cancer , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[36]  C. Bieberich,et al.  Decreased NKX3.1 protein expression in focal prostatic atrophy, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma: association with gleason score and chromosome 8p deletion. , 2006, Cancer research.

[37]  R. Lothe,et al.  Statistical dissection of genetic pathways involved in prostate carcinogenesis , 2006, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[38]  A. Chiocchetti,et al.  Molecular biological analysis of the heterogeneous prostate cancer group Gleason score 7 , 2006, The Prostate.

[39]  R. Lothe,et al.  8q Gain Is an Independent Predictor of Poor Survival in Diagnostic Needle Biopsies from Prostate Cancer Suspects , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[40]  A. Haese*,et al.  Clinical Significance of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Protein Overexpression and Gene Copy Number Gains in Prostate Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[41]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[42]  Jin Woo Kim,et al.  DNA copy number alterations in prostate cancers: A combined analysis of published CGH studies , 2007, The Prostate.

[43]  G. Sauter,et al.  HER2, TOP2A, CCND1, EGFR and C-MYC oncogene amplification in colorectal cancer , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[44]  R. Henrique,et al.  Relative copy number gain of MYC in diagnostic needle biopsies is an independent prognostic factor for prostate cancer patients. , 2007, European urology.

[45]  M. Bolla,et al.  Guidelines EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer , 2007 .

[46]  G. Sauter,et al.  Molecular staging of prostate cancer in the year 2007 , 2007, World Journal of Urology.

[47]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[48]  G. Sauter,et al.  Distinct Subcellular Expression Patterns of Neutral Endopeptidase (CD10) in Prostate Cancer Predict Diverging Clinical Courses in Surgically Treated Patients , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[49]  Martin Schostak,et al.  Expression and prognostic relevance of annexin A3 in prostate cancer. , 2008, European urology.

[50]  A. Haese*,et al.  Clinical significance of p53 alterations in surgically treated prostate cancers , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[51]  Michel Bolla,et al.  [EAU guidelines on prostate cancer]. , 2009, Actas urologicas espanolas.

[52]  G. Sauter,et al.  Immunological microenvironment in prostate cancer: High mast cell densities are associated with favorable tumor characteristics and good prognosis , 2009, The Prostate.

[53]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: biologic and methodologic considerations. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  T. Furuya,et al.  Comparison of chromosomal aberrations between primary tumors and their synchronous lymph-node metastases in intestinal-type gastric carcinoma. , 2009, Pathology, research and practice.