Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

PURPOSE To determine whether adding shear-wave (SW) elastographic features could improve accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) assessment of breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS From September 2008 to September 2010, 958 women consented to repeat standard breast US supplemented by quantitative SW elastographic examination in this prospective multicenter institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol. B-mode Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) features and assessments were recorded. SW elastographic evaluation (mean, maximum, and minimum elasticity of stiffest portion of mass and surrounding tissue; lesion-to-fat elasticity ratio; ratio of SW elastographic-to-B-mode lesion diameter or area; SW elastographic lesion shape and homogeneity) was performed. Qualitative color SW elastographic stiffness was assessed independently. Nine hundred thirty-nine masses were analyzable; 102 BI-RADS category 2 masses were assumed to be benign; reference standard was available for 837 category 3 or higher lesions. Considering BI-RADS category 4a or higher as test positive for malignancy, effect of SW elastographic features on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity after reclassifying category 3 and 4a masses was determined. RESULTS Median participant age was 50 years; 289 of 939 (30.8%) masses were malignant (median mass size, 12 mm). B-mode BI-RADS AUC was 0.950; eight of 303 (2.6%) BI-RADS category 3 masses, 18 of 193 (9.3%) category 4a lesions, 41 of 97 (42%) category 4b lesions, 42 of 57 (74%) category 4c lesions, and 180 of 187 (96.3%) category 5 lesions were malignant. By using visual color stiffness to selectively upgrade category 3 and lack of stiffness to downgrade category 4a masses, specificity improved from 61.1% (397 of 650) to 78.5% (510 of 650) (P<.001); AUC increased to 0.962 (P=.005). Oval shape on SW elastographic images and quantitative maximum elasticity of 80 kPa (5.2 m/sec) or less improved specificity (69.4% [451 of 650] and 77.4% [503 of 650], P<.001 for both), without significant improvement in sensitivity or AUC. CONCLUSION Adding SW elastographic features to BI-RADS feature analysis improved specificity of breast US mass assessment without loss of sensitivity.

[1]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography. , 2011, Radiology.

[2]  Wendie A Berg,et al.  Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[3]  J. Harvey,et al.  Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M. Helvie,et al.  Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy? , 2008, Academic radiology.

[5]  Jin Young Kwak,et al.  Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  B. Garra.  Imaging and Estimation of Tissue Elasticity by Ultrasound , 2007, Ultrasound quarterly.

[7]  T. Helbich,et al.  Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? , 2007, Radiology.

[8]  D. Goo,et al.  Sonographic Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Cystic Lesions of the Breast , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  M. Mainiero,et al.  BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. , 2006, Radiology.

[10]  T. Helbich,et al.  Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  Les Irwig,et al.  Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  W. Berg,et al.  Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. , 2003, Radiology.

[13]  E. Halpern,et al.  Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review. , 2002, Radiology.

[14]  X. Varas,et al.  Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. Helvie,et al.  Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  C. Merritt,et al.  Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound. , 2001, Seminars in roentgenology.

[17]  D. Salas,et al.  Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  A. Stavros,et al.  Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. , 2001, Radiology.

[19]  L. Bassett,et al.  Imaging of breast masses. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  B. Fornage,et al.  Sonography of Palpable Breast Cancer , 2000, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[21]  L. Venta,et al.  Management of complex breast cysts. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[24]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. , 1998, Radiology.

[25]  Frauke Hild,et al.  Ductal orientated sonography improves the diagnosis of pathological nipple discharge of the female breast compared with galactography , 1998, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[26]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[27]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. , 1994, Radiology.

[28]  E. Sickles.  Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. , 1994, Radiology.

[29]  A. Stavros,et al.  US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. , 1993, Radiology.

[30]  J. Cuzick,et al.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  J. R. Landis,et al.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.