Knowing me knowing you: exploring effects of culture and context on perception of robot personality

We carry out a set of experiments to assess collaboration between human users and robots in a cross-cultural setting. This paper describes the study design and deployment of a video-based study to investigate task-dependence and cultural-background dependence of the personality trait attribution on a socially interactive robot. In Human-Robot Interaction, as well as in Human-Agent Interaction research, the attribution of personality traits towards intelligent agents has already been researched intensively in terms of the social similarity or complementary rule. We assume that searching the explanation for personality trait attribution in the similarity and complementary rule does not take into account important contextual factors. Just like people equate certain personality types to certain professions, we expect that people may have certain personality expectations depending on the context of the task the robot carries out. Because professions have different social meaning in different national culture, we also expect that these task-dependent personality preferences differ across cultures. Therefore, we suggest an experiment that considers the task-context and the cultural-background of users.

[1]  K. M. Lee,et al.  Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction , 2006 .

[2]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Timothy N. Hornyak,et al.  Loving the Machine: The Art and Science of Japanese Robots , 2006 .

[4]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[5]  KandaTakayuki,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006 .

[6]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  Frédéric Kaplan,et al.  Who is Afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[8]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[9]  R. McCrae,et al.  Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture , 2004 .

[10]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[11]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  When in Rome: The role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[14]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.