Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat

Abstract Restoration of western dry forests in the USA often focuses on reducing fuel loads. In the range of the spotted owl, these treatments may reduce canopy cover and tree density, which could reduce preferred habitat conditions for the owl and other sensitive species. In particular, high canopy cover (≥70%) has been widely reported to be an important feature of spotted owl habitat, but averages of stand-level forest cover do not provide important information on foliage height and gap structure. To provide better quantification of canopy structure, we used airborne LiDAR imagery to identify canopy cover in different height strata and the size and frequency of gaps that were associated with owl nest sites, protected activity centers (PACs), and territories within four study areas and 316 owl territories. Although total canopy cover was high in nest stands and PAC areas, the cover in tall (>48 m) trees was the canopy structure most highly selected for, while cover in lower strata (2–16 m) was avoided compared to availability in the surrounding landscape. Tall tree cover gradually decreased and lower strata cover increased as distance increased from the nest. Large (>1000 m2) gaps were not found near nests, but otherwise there was no difference in gap frequencies and sizes between PACs and territories and the surrounding landscape. Using cluster analysis we classified canopy conditions into 5 structural classes and 4 levels of canopy cover to assess the relationship between total canopy cover and tree size within nest sites, PACs, and territories. High canopy cover (≥70%) mostly occurs when large tree cover is high, indicating the two variables are often confounded. Our results suggest that the cover of tall trees may be a better predictor of owl habitat than total canopy cover because the latter can include cover in the 2–16 m strata – conditions that owls actually avoid. Management strategies designed to preserve and facilitate the growth of tall trees while reducing the cover and density of understory trees may improve forest resilience to drought and wildfire while also maintaining or promoting the characteristics of owl habitat.

[1]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) habitat use patterns in a burned landscape , 2017, The Condor.

[2]  M. Fortin,et al.  Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data , 2012 .

[3]  M. North,et al.  NEST TREES OF NORTHERN FLYING SQUIRRELS IN YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA , 2007 .

[4]  E. Knapp,et al.  Chapter 12: The variable-density thinning study at Stanislaus-Tuolumne Experimental Forest , 2012 .

[5]  Lisa J. Graumlich,et al.  A 1000-Year Record of Temperature and Precipitation in the Sierra Nevada , 1993, Quaternary Research.

[6]  M. North,et al.  Short-term effects of fire and forest thinning on truffle abundance and consumption by Neotamias speciosus in the Sierra Nevada of California , 2005 .

[7]  Jiquan Chen,et al.  Spatial variability in microclimate in a mixed-conifer forest before and after thinning and burning treatments , 2010 .

[8]  R. Harrod,et al.  Historical stand reconstruction in ponderosa pine forests to guide silvicultural prescriptions , 1999 .

[9]  Craig M. Thompson,et al.  Landscape fuel reduction, forest fire, and biophysical linkages to local habitat use and local persistence of fishers ( Pekania pennanti ) in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests , 2016 .

[10]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Evaluating the Efficacy of Protected Habitat Areas for the California Spotted Owl Using Long-Term Monitoring Data , 2012 .

[11]  Aaron M.Ellison.  PC‐ORD: Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data , 1998, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Relation between Occupancy and Abundance for a Territorial Species, the California Spotted Owl , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[13]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  Estimation of habitat selection for central-place foraging animals. , 1999 .

[14]  Robert J. McGaughey,et al.  Assessing fire effects on forest spatial structure using a fusion of Landsat and airborne LiDAR data in Yosemite National Park , 2014 .

[15]  M. North,et al.  Association of weather and nest-site structure with reproductive success in California spotted owls , 2000 .

[16]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  An Ecosystem Management Strategy for Sierran Mixed-Conifer Forests , 2012 .

[17]  Brandon M. Collins,et al.  Constraints on Mechanized Treatment Significantly Limit Mechanical Fuels Reduction Extent in the Sierra Nevada , 2015 .

[18]  H. H. Darr.  Historical Effects of Logging on the Forests of the Cascade and Sierra Nevada Ranges of California , 1990 .

[19]  John M. Goodburn,et al.  The Effects of Spatial Patterns on the Accuracy of Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS) Estimates of Forest Canopy Cover , 2008 .

[20]  A. Taylor.  IDENTIFYING FOREST REFERENCE CONDITIONS ON EARLY CUT‐OVER LANDS, LAKE TAHOE BASIN, USA , 2004 .

[21]  Malcolm P. North,et al.  NEST TREES OF NORTHERN FLYING SQUIRRELS IN THE SIERRA NEVADA , 2005 .

[22]  S. Juliano,et al.  POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2007, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[23]  M. Rautiainen,et al.  Estimation of forest canopy cover: A comparison of field measurement techniques , 2006 .

[24]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Methods for collecting and analyzing demographic data on the northern spotted owl , 1996 .

[25]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Earth Stewardship: science for action to sustain the human‐earth system , 2011 .

[26]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Megafires: an emerging threat to old-forest species , 2016 .

[27]  M. Seamans,et al.  Effects of forest management on California Spotted Owls: implications for reducing wildfire risk in fire‐prone forests. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  J. L. Vankat.  Vegetation changes in Sequoia National Park, California , 1978 .

[29]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Wildfire impacts on California spotted owl nesting habitat in the Sierra Nevada. , 2016 .

[30]  P. Kennedy,et al.  DO SOME NORTHERN GOSHAWK NEST AREAS CONSISTENTLY FLEDGE MORE YOUNG THAN OTHERS? , 2002 .

[31]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPOTTED OWL DIET AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN THE SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA , 1999 .

[32]  L. Irwin,et al.  Modeling Foraging Habitat of California Spotted Owls , 2007 .

[33]  C. Ramirez,et al.  Meta-analysis of California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) territory occupancy in the Sierra Nevada: Habitat associations and their implications for forest management , 2016, The Condor.

[34]  David R. Anderson,et al.  CLIMATE, HABITAT QUALITY, AND FITNESS IN NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL POPULATIONS IN NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA , 2000 .

[35]  S. Stephens,et al.  Impacts of different land management histories on forest change. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[36]  W. Zielinski,et al.  Short-term effects of fuel treatments on fisher habitat in the Sierra Nevada, California , 2013 .

[37]  Malcolm P. North,et al.  Vegetation and ecological characteristics of mixed-conifer and red fir forests at the Teakettle Experimental Forest , 2002 .

[38]  M. Seamans,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HABITAT ALTERATION AND SPOTTED OWL TERRITORY OCCUPANCY AND BREEDING DISPERSAL , 2007 .

[39]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Nest Sites and Nesting Habitat of the Northern Spotted Owl in Northwestern California , 1999 .

[40]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  The California Spotted Owl: A Technical Assessment of Its Current Status. , 1992 .

[41]  Topographic Variation in Structure of Mixed-Conifer Forests Under an Active-Fire Regime , 2012, Ecosystems.

[42]  A. Larson,et al.  Tree spatial patterns in fire-frequent forests of western North America, including mechanisms of pattern formation and implications for designing fuel reduction and restoration treatments , 2012 .

[43]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments , 2005 .

[44]  M. Barbour,et al.  Influence of Fire and El Niño on Tree Recruitment Varies by Species in Sierran Mixed Conifer , 2005, Forest Science.

[45]  B. Biswell,et al.  Northern Spotted Owls: Influence of Prey Base and Landscape Character , 1992 .

[46]  M. Kelly,et al.  LiDAR as a Tool to Characterize Wildlife Habitat: California Spotted Owl Nesting Habitat as an Example , 2011 .

[47]  P. Stine,et al.  Chapter 13: Applying GTR 220 Concepts on the Sagehen Experimental Forest , 2012 .

[48]  C. Fettig,et al.  Effects of Fire and Fire Surrogate Treatments on Bark Beetle-Caused Tree Mortality in the Southern Cascades, California , 2010 .

[49]  S. Stephens,et al.  Novel characterization of landscape-level variability in historical vegetation structure. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[50]  James E. Hines,et al.  Population Dynamics of Spotted Owls in the Sierra Nevada, California , 2010 .

[51]  D. H. Vuren,et al.  California Spotted Owl, Songbird, and Small Mammal Responses to Landscape Fuel Treatments , 2014 .

[52]  B. Noon,et al.  Habitat selection by northern spotted owls : The consequences of prey selection and distribution , 1998 .

[53]  B. Noon,et al.  Home-range and habitat-use of California spotted owls in the Sierra Nevada , 1992 .

[54]  David R. Anderson,et al.  SITE OCCUPANCY, APPARENT SURVIVAL, AND REPRODUCTION OF CALIFORNIA SPOTTED OWLS IN RELATION TO FOREST STAND CHARACTERISTICS , 2005 .

[55]  C. Fettig,et al.  Effects of prescribed fire and season of burn on direct and indirect levels of tree mortality in Ponderosa and Jeffrey Pine Forests in California, USA. , 2010 .

[56]  D. Call,et al.  Foraging Habitat and Home-Range Characteristics of California Spotted Owls in the Sierra Nevada , 1992 .

[57]  M. North,et al.  Effect of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments on woody debris and snag dynamics in a Sierran old-growth, mixed-conifer forest , 2006 .

[58]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Progressive forest canopy water loss during the 2012–2015 California drought , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  J. W. Wagtendonk,et al.  Effects of fire on spotted owl site occupancy in a late-successional forest , 2011 .

[60]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Forest Stand Structure of the Northern Spotted Owl's Foraging Habitat , 1999, Forest Science.

[61]  James E. Hines,et al.  Population dynamics of the California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis): a meta-analysis , 2004 .

[62]  T. Stohlgren.  Resilience of a heavily logged grove of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Kings Canyon National Park, California , 1992 .

[63]  A. Paletto,et al.  Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[64]  D. Call,et al.  Nest-site selection and reproductive success of California spotted owls , 1997 .

[65]  David J. Parsons,et al.  Natural fire management in National Parks , 1986 .

[66]  S. Stephens,et al.  Impacts of fire exclusion and recent managed fire on forest structure in old growth Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests , 2011 .

[67]  E. Knapp,et al.  Long-term overstory and understory change following logging and fire exclusion in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest , 2013 .

[68]  D. Sheil,et al.  Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures , 1999 .

[69]  S. Stephens,et al.  Historical and current landscape‐scale ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forest structure in the Southern Sierra Nevada , 2015 .

[70]  Perry J. Williams,et al.  Use of private lands for foraging by California spotted owls in the central Sierra Nevada , 2014 .

[71]  Harold S. J. Zald,et al.  Influence of soil thickness on stand characteristics in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[72]  Danny C. Lee,et al.  Assessing risks to spotted owls from forest thinning in fire-adapted forests of the western United States , 2005 .

[73]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: Increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion , 2012 .

[74]  Landsborough Thomson,et al.  Birds of North America , 1962, Nature.

[75]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. , 2000 .

[76]  M. Barbour,et al.  Influence of fire and El Niño on tree recruitment by Sierran mixed conifer , 2005 .

[77]  S. Stephens,et al.  Harnessing fire for wildlife , 2010 .

[78]  Robin J. Innes,et al.  Habitat Associations of Dusky-footed Woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes) in Mixed-conifer Forest of the Northern Sierra Nevada , 2007 .

[79]  D. Peterson,et al.  Mixed Conifer Forests of the Sierra Nevada , 1992 .

[80]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Evaluating short‐ and long‐term impacts of fuels treatments and simulated wildfire on an old‐forest species , 2015 .

[81]  C. J. Zabel,et al.  Influence of primary prey on home-range size and habitat-use patterns of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) , 1995 .

[82]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Current and projected condition of mid-elevation Sierra Nevada forests , 2017 .

[83]  R. McGaughey,et al.  Assessing fi re effects on forest spatial structure using a fusion of Landsat and airborne LiDAR data in Yosemite National Park , 2014 .

[84]  M. North,et al.  Microhabitat Associations of Northern Flying Squirrels in Burned and Thinned Forest Stands of the Sierra Nevada , 2007 .

[85]  Malcolm P. North,et al.  Water balance and topography predict fire and forest structure patterns , 2015 .

[86]  C. Carroll,et al.  The Importance of Being Spatial (and Reserved): Assessing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat Relationships with Hierarchical Bayesian Models , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[87]  D. Mouillot,et al.  Niche overlap estimates based on quantitative functional traits: a new family of non-parametric indices , 2005, Oecologia.

[88]  M. Finney,et al.  Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA , 2007 .

[89]  S. Garman,et al.  Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades , 2006 .

[90]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[91]  S. Mori,et al.  Resting structures and resting habitat of fishers in the southern Sierra Nevada, California , 2009 .

[92]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Corroborating Evidence of a Pre-Euro-American Low- to Moderate-Severity Fire Regime in Yellow Pine-Mixed Conifer Forests of the Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2017 .

[93]  Perry J. Williams,et al.  Home Range and Habitat Selection of Spotted Owls in the Central Sierra Nevada , 2011 .

[94]  Ross A. Gerrard,et al.  Realized population change for long‐term monitoring: California spotted owl case study , 2013 .

[95]  E. Knapp,et al.  Quantifying spatial patterns of tree groups and gaps in mixed-conifer forests: Reference conditions and long-term changes following fire suppression and logging , 2013 .

[96]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Assessing forest metrics with a ground-based scanning lidar , 2004 .

[97]  M. Durand,et al.  Characterizing the extreme 2015 snowpack deficit in the Sierra Nevada (USA) and the implications for drought recovery , 2016 .

[98]  J. Viers,et al.  Using Topography to Meet Wildlife and Fuels Treatment Objectives in Fire-Suppressed Landscapes , 2010, Environmental management.