Simulation of the elastic properties of porous ceramics with realistic microstructure

Quasi-static discrete element method (DEM) simulations are used to model the elastic behavior of porous ceramic obtained by partial sintering. The porous ceramic is modeled as a set of particles bonded by solid necks. A new approach introducing bond interactions is proposed to allow, in particular, the correct prediction of Poisson's ratio. It leads to a simple formulation that takes into account the deformation of a particle subjected to multiple contact forces, without the complexity of a full finite element method (FEM) analysis. The advantage of this new formulation is demonstrated, first by a comparison with FEM calculations on a simple test case, and then by a comparison with experimental results and other models from the literature on random aggregates of partially sintered particles. The proposed model with bond interactions correctly predicts Poisson's ratio of porous ceramics and improves the accuracy of Young's modulus when compared with the DEM model without bond interactions.

[1]  Habib Mohamadian,et al.  Various shape memory effects of stimuli-responsive shape memory polymers , 2013 .

[2]  I. Lyashenko,et al.  Statistical theory of the boundary friction of atomically flat solid surfaces in the presence of a lubricant layer , 2012 .

[3]  R. Dendievel,et al.  Architectural optimization of porous Ultra Low K dielectric material via Finite Element simulations. , 2011 .

[4]  Xiaoxing Liu,et al.  Strength of Highly Porous Ceramic Electrodes , 2011 .

[5]  Xiaoxing Liu,et al.  Microstructure of porous composite electrodes generated by the discrete element method , 2011 .

[6]  Xiaoxing Liu,et al.  Elasticity and strength of partially sintered ceramics , 2010 .

[7]  Didier Imbault,et al.  Modeling of high-density compaction of granular materials by the Discrete Element Method , 2009 .

[8]  H. Riedel,et al.  Effect of Different Particle Size Distributions on Solid‐State Sintering: A Microscopic Simulation Approach , 2009 .

[9]  R. Bordia,et al.  Influence of adhesion and friction on the geometry of packings of spherical particles. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  S. Deville Freeze‐Casting of Porous Ceramics: A Review of Current Achievements and Issues , 2008, 1710.04201.

[11]  N. Page,et al.  Elastic properties of powders during compaction. Part 1: Pseudo-isotropic moduli , 2007 .

[12]  N. Monteiro Azevedo,et al.  Hybrid discrete element/finite element method for fracture analysis , 2006 .

[13]  André R. Studart,et al.  Processing Routes to Macroporous Ceramics: A Review , 2006 .

[14]  Robert M. McMeeking,et al.  Deformation of Interparticle Necks by Diffusion-Controlled Creep , 2005 .

[15]  J. Rödel,et al.  Evolution of Young's Modulus, Strength, and Microstructure during Liquid‐Phase Sintering , 2005 .

[16]  J. Rödel,et al.  Evolution of Mechanical Properties of Porous Alumina during Free Sintering and Hot Pressing , 2004 .

[17]  P. Cundall,et al.  A bonded-particle model for rock , 2004 .

[18]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Combination of discrete element and finite element methods for dynamic analysis of geomechanics problems , 2004 .

[19]  Christophe L. Martin,et al.  Study of particle rearrangement during powder compaction by the Discrete Element Method , 2003 .

[20]  G. Jefferson,et al.  The elastic response of a cohesive aggregate: a discrete element model with coupled particle interaction , 2002 .

[21]  B. Rand,et al.  Mechanical properties of magnesia-spinel composites , 2002 .

[22]  J. Rödel,et al.  Evolution of defect size and strength of porous alumina during sintering , 2000 .

[23]  E. Garboczi,et al.  Elastic Properties of Model Porous Ceramics , 2000, cond-mat/0006334.

[24]  Per-Lennart Larsson,et al.  Similarity analysis of inelastic contact , 1997 .

[25]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Prediction of the Poisson's ratio of porous materials , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.

[26]  A. M. Prior,et al.  Applications of implicit and explicit finite element techniques to metal forming , 1994 .

[27]  A. Evans,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Partially Dense Alumina Produced from Powder Compacts , 1994 .

[28]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  A Micromechanical Description of Granular Material Behavior , 1981 .

[29]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[30]  Robert L. Coble,et al.  Initial Sintering of Alumina and Hematite , 1958 .

[31]  R. Bordia,et al.  The effect of a substrate on the sintering of constrained films , 2009 .

[32]  H. Riedel,et al.  Simulations of the influence of rearrangement during sintering , 2007 .

[33]  G. Jefferson,et al.  Elastic and Visco-elastic Response of Finite Particle Junctions in Granular Materials , 2001 .

[34]  D. J. Green,et al.  Fracture toughness of partially-sintered brittle materials , 1996 .

[35]  F. Wéber,et al.  Mechanical properties in the initial stage of sintering , 1995, Journal of Materials Science.

[36]  D. J. Green,et al.  Mechanical behavior of porous glasses produced by sintering of spherical particles , 1995 .

[37]  D. J. Green,et al.  The Elastic Behavior of Partially-Sintered Materials , 1988 .