An Investigation into Kanji Character Discrimination Process from EEG Signals

The frontal area in the brain is known to be involved in behavioral judgement. Because a Kanji character can be discriminated visually and linguistically from other characters, in Kanji character discrimination, we hypothesized that frontal event-related potential (ERP) waveforms reflect two discrimination processes in separate time periods: one based on visual analysis and the other based on lexcical access. To examine this hypothesis, we recorded ERPs while performing a Kanji lexical decision task. In this task, either a known Kanji character, an unknown Kanji character or a symbol was presented and the subject had to report if the presented character was a known Kanji character for the subject or not. The same response was required for unknown Kanji trials and symbol trials. As a preprocessing of signals, we examined the performance of a method using independent component analysis for artifact rejection and found it was effective. Therefore we used it. In the ERP results, there were two time periods in which the frontal ERP wavefoms were significantly different betweeen the unknown Kanji trials and the symbol trials: around 170ms and around 300ms after stimulus onset. This result supported our hypothesis. In addition, the result suggests that Kanji character lexical access may be fully completed by around 260ms after stimulus onset. Keywords— Character discrimination, Event-related Potential, Independent Component Analysis, Kanji, Lexical access.

[1]  Minoru Nakayama,et al.  Event-related Potential Study of Kanji Perception Process , 2006 .

[2]  R VanRullen,et al.  Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorisation of Natural and Artifactual Objects , 2001, Perception.

[3]  M. Sigman,et al.  The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[6]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  M Hayashi,et al.  Semantic Activation by Japanese Kanji: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  Margot J. Taylor Non-spatial attentional effects on P1 , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Rudell Rapid stream stimulation and the recognition potential. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[12]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Manuel Martín-Loeches,et al.  The Recognition Potential: An ERP Index of Lexical Access , 1999, Brain and Language.

[14]  Makoto Iwata,et al.  Kanji versus Kananeuropsychological correlates of the Japanese writing system , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  D. Stuss,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience. , 1993, Current opinion in neurobiology.

[16]  J. Kenemans,et al.  Removal of the ocular artifact from the EEG: a comparison of time and frequency domain methods with simulated and real data. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[17]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.