Massive Connectivity With Massive MIMO—Part II: Achievable Rate Characterization

This two-part paper aims to quantify the cost of device activity detection in an uplink massive connectivity scenario with a large number of devices but device activities are sporadic. Part I of this paper shows that in an asymptotic massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) regime, device activity detection can always be made perfect. Part II of this paper subsequently shows that despite the perfect device activity detection, there is nevertheless significant cost due to device detection in terms of overall achievable rate, because of the fact that nonorthogonal pilot sequences have to be used in order to accommodate the large number of potential devices, resulting in significantly larger channel estimation error as compared to conventional massive MIMO systems with orthogonal pilots. Specifically, this paper characterizes each active user's achievable rate using random matrix theory under either maximal-ratio combining (MRC) or minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) receive beamforming at the base station (BS), assuming the statistics of their estimated channels as derived in Part I. The characterization of user rate also allows the optimization of pilot sequences length. Moreover, in contrast to the conventional massive MIMO system, the MMSE beamforming is shown to achieve much higher rate than the MRC beamforming for the massive connectivity scenario under consideration. Finally, this paper illustrates the necessity of user scheduling for rate maximization when the number of active users is larger than the number of antennas at the BS.

[1]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Numbers of Base Station Antennas , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Wei Yu,et al.  Massive Connectivity With Massive MIMO—Part I: Device Activity Detection and Channel Estimation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  How much training is needed in multiple-antenna wireless links? , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Wei Yu,et al.  Massive device connectivity with massive MIMO , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[5]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  David Tse,et al.  Linear Multiuser Receivers: Effective Interference, Effective Bandwidth and User Capacity , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Large System Analysis of Linear Precoding in Correlated MISO Broadcast Channels Under Limited Feedback , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  R. Couillet,et al.  Random Matrix Methods for Wireless Communications: Estimation , 2011 .

[9]  Sundeep Rangan,et al.  Generalized approximate message passing for estimation with random linear mixing , 2010, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[10]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Energy and Spectral Efficiency of Very Large Multiuser MIMO Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[11]  David James Love,et al.  Downlink Training Techniques for FDD Massive MIMO Systems: Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Training With Memory , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[12]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of Cellular Networks: How Many Antennas Do We Need? , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  The dynamics of message passing on dense graphs, with applications to compressed sensing , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[14]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Belief propagation for joint sparse recovery , 2011, ArXiv.

[15]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.