THE ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS OF ALTRUISM IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS POPULATIONS

Abstract.— We study the spatial adaptive dynamics of a continuous trait that measures individual investment in altruism. Our study is based on an ecological model of a spatially heterogeneous population from which we derive an appropriate measure of fitness. The analysis of this fitness measure uncovers three different selective processes controlling the evolution of altruism: the direct physiological cost, the indirect genetic benefits of cooperative interactions, and the indirect genetic costs of competition for space. In our model, habitat structure and a continuous life cycle makes the cost of competing for space with relatives negligible. Our study yields a classification of adaptive patterns of altruism according to the shape of the costs of altruism (with decelerating, linear, or accelerating dependence on the investment in altruism). The invasion of altruism occurs readily in species with accelerating costs, but large mutations are critical for altruism to evolve in selfish species with decelerating costs. Strict selfishness is maintained by natural selection only under very restricted conditions. In species with rapidly accelerating costs, adaptation leads to an evolutionarily stable rate of investment in altruism that decreases smoothly with the level of mobility. A rather different adaptive pattern emerges in species with slowly accelerating costs: high altruism evolves at low mobility, whereas a quasi‐selfish state is promoted in more mobile species. The high adaptive level of altruism can be predicted solely from habitat connectedness and physiological parameters that characterize the pattern of cost. We also show that environmental changes that cause increased mobility in those highly altruistic species can beget selection‐driven self‐extinction, which may contribute to the rarity of social species.

[1]  M N,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in a Lattice-Structured Population , 1996 .

[2]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics and evolution: evolutionarily stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Relaxation Projections and the Method of Moments , 1999 .

[4]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Lattice Models and Pair Approximation in Ecology , 2000 .

[5]  D. Wilson,et al.  Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  P D Taylor,et al.  Unifying genetic and game theoretic models of kin selection for continuous traits. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[8]  Paul Marrow,et al.  The coevolution of predator—prey interactions : ESSS and Red Queen dynamics , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Marino Gatto,et al.  Lyapunov exponents and the mathematics of invasion in oscillatory or chaotic populations , 1995 .

[11]  R. Lenski,et al.  Loss of social behaviors by myxococcus xanthus during evolution in an unstructured habitat. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. O'Riain,et al.  A dispersive morph in the naked mole-rat , 1996, Nature.

[13]  G. B. Pollock,et al.  Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[14]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[15]  W. Wcislo,et al.  Secondarily solitary: the evolutionary loss of social behavior. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Score-dependent fertility model for the evolution of cooperation in a lattice. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  P. Taylor Altruism in viscous populations — an inclusive fitness model , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[18]  R. Heinsohn,et al.  The cost of helping. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  M. Baalen,et al.  The Unit of Selection in Viscous Populations and the Evolution of Altruism. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  J. Jarvis,et al.  Comparative patterns of philopatry and dispersal in two common mole-rat populations: implications for the evolution of mole-rat sociality , 2000 .

[21]  G T Vickers,et al.  The spatial struggle of tit-for-tat and defect. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  R. Lenski,et al.  Developmental cheating in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus , 2000, Nature.

[23]  M. O'Riain,et al.  Mammalian eusociality: a family affair. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  D. Queller,et al.  Does population viscosity promote kin selection? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[26]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[27]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  R. Michod Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality , 1999 .

[29]  P D Taylor,et al.  OVERLAPPING GENERATIONS CAN PROMOTE ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  Stephen T. Emlen,et al.  The Evolution of Helping. I. An Ecological Constraints Model , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[31]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[32]  David A. Rand,et al.  Correlation Equations and Pair Approximations for Spatial Ecologies , 1999 .

[33]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[34]  J. Koella,et al.  The spatial spread of altruism versus the evolutionary response of egoists , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[36]  G. Roberts,et al.  Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment , 1998, Nature.

[37]  J. Metz,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics: A Geometrical Study of the Consequences of Nearly Faithful Reproduction , 1995 .

[38]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environment , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  S. Naeem,et al.  The Phylogenetic Component of Cooperative Breeding in Perching Birds , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Minus van Baalen,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Pair Approximations for Different Spatial Geometries , 2000 .

[41]  O. Leimar,et al.  The evolution of cooperation in mobile organisms , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  M. Doebeli,et al.  Variable investment, the Continuous Prisoner's Dilemma, and the origin of cooperation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Population: The Lattice Lotka-Volterra Model , 1992 .

[44]  D. Queller,et al.  Genetic relatedness in viscous populations , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[45]  Richard E. Michod,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatially Heterogeneous Populations , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  The evolution of cooperation in a lattice-structured population. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[47]  C. Barnard Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edition, J.R. Krebs, N.B. Davies (Eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1984), xi , 1985 .

[48]  A. Cockburn EVOLUTION OF HELPING BEHAVIOR IN COOPERATIVELY BREEDING BIRDS , 1998 .

[49]  R. Ferrière,et al.  Invasion fitness and adaptive dynamics in spatial population models , 2001 .

[50]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[51]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Population , 1992 .

[53]  Andrew Cockburn,et al.  Helping is costly to young birds in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[55]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Rover: A Strategy for Exploiting Cooperators in a Patchy Environment , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[56]  S. Siller Foundations of Social Evolution , 1999, Heredity.

[57]  R. Michod,et al.  Invading wave of cooperation in a spatial iterated prisoner’s dilemma , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  M. Doebeli,et al.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.