How weak are Romanian clitic pronouns?

In traditional linguistics, pronouns are divided into two classes: those that can bear word stress, coined strong, full or tonal, and those that can not, coined weak, clitic, or atonal. However, in the last decades, research on this topic showed that items generally labeled as clitics are by far more complex. Between words and affixes, these hybrid linguistic entities challenge both description and modeling. As for Romanian, the debate on weak (i.e., clitic) pronouns was dominated by the question about their categorial status: are these items clitics or affixes? In this article, we present and scrutinize different approaches that support the claim that there is a difference between proclitics and enclitics, i.e., between clitics occurring before vs. after the verb. Since Romanian features a full-fledged pronominal system with different deficiency degrees, we evaluate these claims against it. We show that all these approaches manifest basic deficiencies.

[1]  Adina Dragomirescu,et al.  The loss of analyticity in the history of Romanian verbal morphology , 2022, Periphrasis and Inflexion in Diachrony.

[2]  A. Tigău Differential Object Marking in Romanian and Spanish: A contrastive analysis between differentially marked and unmarked direct objects , 2021, Differential Object Marking in Romance.

[3]  Diego Pescarini An emergentist view on functional classes , 2019, Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation.

[4]  Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation , 2019 .

[5]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later , 2019, Educational Psychology Review.

[6]  Virginia Hill,et al.  Verb Movement and Clause Structure in Old Romanian , 2016 .

[7]  Gabriela Pană Dindelegan The Syntax of Old Romanian , 2016 .

[8]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Defining vs. diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena , 2015 .

[9]  J. Błaszczak,et al.  How Categorical are Categories?: New Approaches to the Old Questions of Noun, Verb, and Adjective , 2015 .

[10]  M. R. Manzini,et al.  Grammatical categories: Strong and weak pronouns in Romance , 2014 .

[11]  Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin,et al.  A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase , 2013 .

[12]  Martin Maiden,et al.  The Grammar of Romanian , 2013 .

[13]  M. Jianu Observations upon the Clitics of the Dative Case in Romanian , 2013 .

[14]  Camelia Firică THE PHONETIC OR THE ETYMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE IN ROMANIAN ORTHOGRAPHY , 2009 .

[15]  Stanca Somesfalean On the form and interpretation of clitics , 2007 .

[16]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The production of pronominal clitics: Implications for theories of lexical access , 2006 .

[17]  Paola Monachesi,et al.  The Verbal Complex in Romance: A Case Study in Grammatical Interfaces , 2005 .

[18]  Sally Johnson Spelling Trouble? Language, Ideology and the Reform of German Orthography , 2005 .

[19]  Tracy Holloway King On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena (review) , 2004 .

[20]  Birgit Gerlach,et al.  Clitics between Syntax and Lexicon , 2002 .

[21]  Alice C. Harris,et al.  Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax , 2002 .

[22]  Paola Monachesi,et al.  Clitic placement in the Romanian verbal complex , 2001 .

[23]  Janet Grijzenhout,et al.  Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax , 2001 .

[24]  G. Legendre Positioning Romanian verbal clitics at PF , 2001 .

[25]  Daniela Caluianu,et al.  An optimality theoretic account for the distribution of pronominal clitics in Romanian , 2000 .

[26]  Alexandra Popescu,et al.  The morphophonology of the Romanian clitic sequence , 2000 .

[27]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Clitics across categories: The case of Romanian , 1999 .

[28]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  The typology of pronouns and the distinction between syntax and morphophonology , 1999 .

[29]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Clitics, subjects and tense in European Portuguese , 1999 .

[30]  Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin The syntax of Romanian : comparative studies in Romance , 1994 .

[31]  A. Avram Sandhi phenomena in Romanian , 1986 .

[32]  A. Zwicky CLITICS AND PARTICLES , 1985 .

[33]  G. Pullum,et al.  CLITICIZATION VS. INFLECTION: ENGLISH N'T , 1983 .

[34]  Ida Toivonen,et al.  Romanian Object Clitics: Grammaticalization, agreement and lexical splits , 2018 .

[35]  Diego Pescarini Stressed enclitics are not weak pronouns A plea for allomorphy , 2017 .

[36]  Johanna Weiss,et al.  Clitics In The Languages Of Europe , 2016 .

[37]  Anca Chereches,et al.  A Prosodic Analysis of Romanian Pronominal Clitics , 2014 .

[38]  Silvia Luraghi,et al.  The Bloomsbury companion to syntax , 2013 .

[39]  A Nevins,et al.  An Apparent `Number Case Constraint' in Romanian: The Role of Syncretism , 2010 .

[40]  J. Cole,et al.  Underlying representations , 2009 .

[41]  Oana Ciucivara,et al.  A syntactic analysis of pronominal clitic clusters in Romance The view from Romanian , 2009 .

[42]  Udo-Michael Klein,et al.  Encoding of argument structure in Romanian and SiSwati , 2007 .

[43]  Robert E. Mercer A mereology-based general linearization model for surface realization , 2007 .

[44]  C. Finocchiaro Psychological evidence on the status of Romance clitics , 2006 .

[45]  K. Goodman,et al.  Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics , 2006 .

[46]  Alexandra Popescu Morphophonologische Phänomene des Rumänischen , 2005 .

[47]  S. Anderson Aspects of the Theory of Clitics , 2005 .

[48]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  On the definition of word , 2004, Machine Translation.

[49]  Andreea S. Calude Romanian clitics: Siding with the Serbo-Croatian or the French? , 2001 .

[50]  M. Starke,et al.  The Typology of Structural Deficiency. A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns , 1999 .

[51]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  Pronouns in Germanic and Romance languages: An overview , 1999 .

[52]  E. Bonet,et al.  The person-case constraint: a morphological approach , 1994 .

[53]  Bonet i Alsina,et al.  Morphology after syntax : pronominal clitics in romance , 1991 .

[54]  Jürgen Bredemeier Strukturbeschränkungen im Rumänischen : Studien zur Syntax d. prä- u. postverbalen Pronomina , 1976 .

[55]  A. Lombard Le î prosthétique du roumain , 1976 .