Spectral Analysis of Motor Unit Action Potentials

The statistical processing of electromyographic signal examination performed in the time domain ensures mostly correct classification of pathology; however, because of an ambiguity of most temporal parameter definitions, a diagnosis can include a significant error that strongly depends on the neurologist's experience. Then, selected temporal parameters are determined for each run, and their mean values are calculated. In the final stage, these mean values are compared with a standard and, including additional clinical information, a diagnosis is given. An inconvenience of this procedure is high time consumption that arises from the necessity of determination of many parameters. Additionally, an ambiguity in determination of basic temporal parameters can cause doubts when parameters found by the physician are compared with standard parameters determined in other research centers. In this paper, we present a definition for spectral discriminant that directly enables a unique diagnosis to be made. An essential advantage of the suggested discriminant is a precise and algorithmically realized definition that enables an objective comparison of examination results obtained by physicians with different experiences or working in different research centers. A suggestion of the standard for selected muscle based on a population of 70 healthy cases is presented in the Results section.

[1]  E Stålberg,et al.  Reference values of motor unit action potentials obtained with multi‐MUAP analysis , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  Constantinos S. Pattichis,et al.  A new technique for the classification and decomposition of EMG signals , 1995, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[3]  Jacqueline Walker,et al.  Application of higher order statistics techniques to EMG signals to characterize the motor unit action potential , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  George S. Moschytz,et al.  Decomposition of EMG signals using time-frequency features , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[5]  E Stålberg,et al.  Modeling studies on irregular motor unit potentials , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Javier Navallas-Irujo,et al.  Filter design for cancellation of baseline-fluctuation in needle EMG recordings , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[7]  Sabri Koçer,et al.  Classification of EMG Signals Using PCA and FFT , 2005, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  E Stålberg,et al.  Quantitative motor unit potential analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[9]  C.I. Christodoulou,et al.  Unsupervised pattern recognition for the classification of EMG signals , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Constantinos S. Pattichis,et al.  Neural network models in EMG diagnosis , 1995 .

[11]  Ewa Zalewska,et al.  Effectiveness of motor unit potentials classification using various parameters and indexes , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  E. Zalewska,et al.  Evaluation of MUAP shape irregularity-a new concept of quantification , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  C.S. Pattichis,et al.  Time-scale analysis of motor unit action potentials , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  C. Pattichis,et al.  Autoregressive and cepstral analyses of motor unit action potentials. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.