Multi-subregion-based probabilistic approach to pose-invariant face recognition

Current automatic facial recognition systems are not robust to changes in illumination, pose, facial expression, and occlusion. In this paper, in order to address the problem of pose change, we propose an algorithm based on a probabilistic approach to face recognition that takes into account the pose difference between probe and gallery images. By using a large facial image database, the CMU PIE database, which contains images of the same set of people taken from many different angles, we have developed a probabilistic model of how facial features change as the pose changes. This model enables us to make our face recognition system more robust to changes of pose in the probe image. The experimental results show that this approach achieves a better recognition rate than conventional face recognition methods over a much larger range of poses. For example, when the gallery contains only images of a frontal face and the probe image varies its pose orientation, the recognition rate shows less than a 10p difference until the probe pose begins to differ by more than 45°, whereas the recognition rate of a PCA-based method begins to drop at differences as small as 10°, and that of a representative commercial system begins to drop at 30°. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Comp Jpn, 37(8): 68–76, 2006; Published online in Wiley InterScience (). DOI 10.1002sscj.20437(This work was done while the first author was visiting the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon)

[1]  David Beymer,et al.  Face recognition under varying pose , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Shizuo Sakamoto,et al.  Geodesic illumination basis: compensating for illumination variations in any pose for face recognition , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[3]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Roberto Brunelli,et al.  Face Recognition: Features Versus Templates , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Ralph Gross,et al.  Eigen light-fields and face recognition across pose , 2002, Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition.

[6]  Alex Pentland,et al.  View-based and modular eigenspaces for face recognition , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  Linear Object Classes and Image Synthesis From a Single Example Image , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Terence Sim,et al.  The CMU Pose, Illumination, and Expression (PIE) database , 2002, Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition.

[9]  Sami Romdhani,et al.  Face identification across different poses and illuminations with a 3D morphable model , 2002, Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition.

[10]  Penio S. Penev,et al.  Local feature analysis: A general statistical theory for object representation , 1996 .

[11]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Multi-subregion based probabilistic approach toward pose-invariant face recognition , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation for the New Millennium (Cat. No.03EX694).

[12]  David J. Beymer,et al.  Pose-invariant face recognition using real and virtual views , 1996 .

[13]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..