Improving the Accuracy of Cardiovascular Component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score*

Objectives:The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score is an attractive risk prediction model because of its simplicity and graded assessment of morbidity and mortality. Due to changes in clinical practice over time, the cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score no longer accurately reflects current clinical practice. To address this limitation, we developed and validated a modified cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score that takes into account all vasoactive agents used in current clinical practice, uses shock index as a substitute for mean arterial pressure, and incorporates serum lactate as a biomarker for shock states. Design:Retrospective cohort. Setting:Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Patients:Adult patients admitted to one of six ICUs. Interventions:None. Measurements and Main Results:Score performance was assessed via area under the receiver operator characteristic curve. A total of 16,386 ICU admissions were included: 9,204 in the derivation cohort and 7,182 in the validation cohort. area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was significantly higher for modified cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score than for cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for in-ICU mortality (0.801 vs 0.718; difference = 0.083; p < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (0.783 vs 0.651; difference = 0.132; p < 0.001), and 28-day mortality (0.737 vs 0.655; difference = 0.082; p < 0.001). When modified cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was added to the remaining Sequential Organ Failure Assessment components, the modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score again outperformed the existing Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score: in-ICU mortality (0.836 vs 0.822; difference = 0.014; p < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (0.799 vs 0.784; difference = 0.015; p < 0.001), and 28-day mortality (0.798 vs 0.783; difference = 0.015; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in the validation cohort. Conclusions:The modified cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score outperforms the existing cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting patient outcomes and improves the overall performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment model. This score is easily calculated, includes serum lactate as a biomarker for shock states, and incorporates all vasopressors used in current clinical practice.

[1]  Amber E Barnato,et al.  A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Brian W. Pickering,et al.  Validation of Computerized Automatic Calculation of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score , 2013, Critical care research and practice.

[3]  Nathan Shapiro,et al.  Shock Index and Early Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Pilot Study , 2013, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[4]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012 , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[5]  Ognjen Gajic,et al.  Derivation and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Surgical Lung Injury Prediction Model , 2011, Anesthesiology.

[6]  V. Herasevich,et al.  Derivation and validation of automated electronic search strategies to identify pertinent risk factors for postoperative acute lung injury. , 2011, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[7]  Ognjen Gajic,et al.  Early identification of patients at risk of acute lung injury: evaluation of lung injury prediction score in a multicenter cohort study. , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[8]  M. Keegan,et al.  Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit , 2011, Critical care medicine.

[9]  J. Vincent,et al.  Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  V. Herasevich,et al.  Informatics infrastructure for syndrome surveillance, decision support, reporting, and modeling of critical illness. , 2010, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  Vitaly Herasevich,et al.  Validation of an electronic surveillance system for acute lung injury , 2009, Intensive Care Medicine.

[12]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[13]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.

[14]  Matthias Egger,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[15]  Bekele Afessa,et al.  Severity of illness and organ failure assessment in adult intensive care units. , 2007, Critical care clinics.

[16]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Intensive care unit length of stay: Benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[17]  L. Ohno-Machado,et al.  Prognosis in critical care. , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[18]  P. Factor,et al.  Role of vasopressin in the management of septic shock , 2004, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  D. Annane,et al.  Circulating vasopressin levels in septic shock. , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[20]  J. Vincent,et al.  Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. , 2001, JAMA.

[21]  Haruhiko Yamada,et al.  Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of low-dose vasopressin infusions in vasodilatory septic shock , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[22]  C. Sprung,et al.  Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[23]  S Lemeshow,et al.  Effect of changing patient mix on the performance of an intensive care unit severity-of-illness model: how to distinguish a general from a specialty intensive care unit. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[24]  J. Vincent,et al.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure , 1996, Intensive Care Medicine.

[25]  C. Sprung,et al.  Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. , 1995, Critical care medicine.

[26]  H. Smithline,et al.  A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[27]  J. Edwards,et al.  Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure. , 1992, Resuscitation.

[28]  W. Knaus,et al.  The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. , 1991, Chest.

[29]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[30]  E. Draper,et al.  APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system , 1985, Critical care medicine.

[31]  J. L. Gall,et al.  A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients , 1984, Critical care medicine.

[32]  D. E. Lawrence,et al.  APACHE—acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system , 1981, Critical care medicine.

[33]  M. Malinchoc,et al.  Eight-year trend of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[34]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. , 1993, JAMA.

[35]  C. Burri,et al.  ["Shock index"]. , 1967, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[36]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.