Many concepts in object-oriented conceptual modelling have complex semantics that are unfortunately not precisely defined. This paper demonstrates that with a few simple and formally defined concepts one can define more complex concepts such as e.g. aggregation in a precise and formal way. The core concepts offer the possibility of layering modelling concepts: a particular pattern of simple lower level concepts can be used to represent a single high level concept. The advantage is that the high level concept is defined in terms of the lower level concepts. Because of their simplicity, the lower level concepts are much easier to define formally. The high-level concept benefits from this formal definition: its own formal definition can be inferred from the formal definition of its constituent lower level concepts. This layered approach can also be followed on a project by project basis by defining high-level concepts only applicable in the context of one particular project.
[1]
Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.
A Survey of UML's Aggregation and Composition Relationships
,
1999,
Obj. Logiciel Base données Réseaux.
[2]
Monique Snoeck,et al.
Object-Oriented Enterprise Modelling with MERODE
,
1999
.
[3]
Joél Brunet.
An Enhanced Definition of Composition and its use for Abstraction
,
1998
.
[4]
Monique Snoeck,et al.
Existence Dependency: The Key to Semantic Integrity Between Structural and Behavioral Aspects of Object Types
,
1998,
IEEE Trans. Software Eng..
[5]
Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.
What is this thing called aggregation?
,
1999,
Proceedings Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems. TOOLS 29 (Cat. No.PR00275).
[6]
James Ross,et al.
Information modeling - an object-oriented approach
,
1994,
Prentice Hall object-oriented series.