Comparison of direct bladder and sacral nerve stimulation in spinal cats.

Neuroprosthetic techniques have been used to facilitate voiding via electrical stimulation for bladder management following spinal cord injury (SCI), but high urethral resistance has been a problem. This problem was investigated here in the chronic, spinal, male cat (C6-T1) using direct bladder and sacral nerve stimulation. Direct bladder stimulation was only conducted during terminal procedures with an open abdomen and with four hook electrodes inserted into the bladder wall. Sacral stimulation was conducted daily during the 10 weeks post-SCI and during terminal procedures. Stimulation was conducted with both implanted epidural electrode and surface electrodes over the sacral bone. Both of these sacral methods stimulated anterior and posterior roots. However, these sacral methods were generally ineffective for inducing voiding during the study. In three of the five animals investigated, stimulation did not empty the bladder. In the remaining two animals, the bladder was emptied with sacral stimulation, but only after return of bladder reflex activity, 2 to 4 weeks post-injury. When poor voiding occurred in spite of high bladder pressures, it indicates high urethral resistance. This was confirmed using video cystourethrography where the membranous urethra was observed to remain closed following stimulation. Direct bladder stimulation was then compared to sacral nerve stimulation during terminal procedures. Direct bladder stimulation induced voiding at a high rate both during and after stimulation, whereas sacral nerve stimulation with implanted electrodes induced voiding at a lower rate and only after stimulation. A simple urethral resistance measure, the ratio of bladder pressure to voiding rate, was lower with direct bladder stimulation than sacral nerve stimulation. Stimulation-facilitated voiding has also been associated with the development of bladder wall hypertrophy. This problem was investigated by evaluating bladder wall thickness postmortem in three groups of animals: the first group was the spinal-stimulated animals detailed above; the additional two groups were a spinal-nonstimulated but instrumented group maintained for 10 weeks following injury, and an intact group of animals. The stimulated spinal cats tended to have the thickest bladder wall followed by the nonstimulated spinal cats. The wall thickness of intact animals served as a control.

[1]  S. Pourmehdi,et al.  A new prosthetic device for full bladder control , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[2]  C. Robinson,et al.  Urethral responses to sacral stimulation in chronic spinal dog. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  Dennis D. Roscoe,et al.  An Externally Powered, Multichannel, Implantable Stimulator for Versatile Control of Paralyzed Muscle , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  R. Schmidt Advances in Genitourinary Neurostimulation , 1986, Neurosurgery.

[5]  A Kantrowitz,et al.  Paraplegic Dogs: Urinary Bladder Evacuation with Direct Electric Stimulation , 1963, Science.

[6]  P. Lale,et al.  THE TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL CORD BLADDER BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION. , 1965, British journal of urology.

[7]  Urodynamic responses to sacral stimulation in the chronic spinal dog , 1988 .

[8]  E. McGuire,et al.  Urodynamics and management of the neuropathic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. , 1985, The Journal of the American Paraplegia Society.

[9]  J. Walter,et al.  Voiding in anesthetized spinal dogs induced by stimulating sacral and coccygeal roots with the “volume conduction” method , 1984 .

[10]  B. Jubelin,et al.  Micturitional Reflexes in Chronic Spinalized Cats: The Underactive Detrusor and Detrusor‐Sphincter Dyssynergia , 1986 .

[11]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[12]  A. Kantrowitz,et al.  Urethral resistance during electrical stimulation. , 1966, Investigative urology.

[13]  R. Gittes,et al.  Detrusor-urethral sphincter dyssynergia. , 1977, The Journal of urology.

[14]  C. Robinson,et al.  Surface stimulation techniques for bladder management in the spinal dog. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[15]  Anterior sacral root stimulator (Brindley): Experiences especially in women with neurogenic urinary incontinence , 1988 .

[16]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Development of reflex activity of detrusor and striated sphincter muscles in experimental paraplegia. , 1978, Urologia internationalis.

[17]  R. Hackler A 25-year prospective mortality study in the spinal cord injured patient: comparison with the long-term living paraplegic. , 1977, The Journal of urology.

[18]  P. Magasi,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the bladder and gravidity. , 1986, Urologia internationalis.

[19]  B S Nashold,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the conus medullaris to control bladder emptying in paraplegia: a ten-year review. , 1982, Applied neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Mortimer,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Recruitment Characteristics of Direct Nerve Stimulation , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  A. Talalla,et al.  FES for Bladder: Direct or Indirect Means? , 1987, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[22]  D. Rushton,et al.  Sacral anterior root stimulators for bladder control in paraplegia: the first 50 cases. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[23]  Gerald E. Loeb,et al.  Neural prosthetic interfaces with the nervous system , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  D. Rushton,et al.  Sacral anterior root stimulators for bladder control in paraplegia , 1982, Paraplegia.