Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease

Abstract Objective: To measure the cost effectiveness of systematic photographic screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease compared with existing practice. Design: Cost effectiveness analysis Setting: Liverpool. Subjects: A target population of 5000 diabetic patients invited for screening. Main outcome measures: Cost effectiveness (cost per true positive) of systematic and opportunistic programmes; incremental cost effectiveness of replacing opportunistic with systematic screening. Results: Baseline prevalence of sight threatening eye disease was 14.1%. The cost effectiveness of the systematic programme was £209 (sensitivity 89%, specificity 86%, compliance 80%, annual cost £104 996) and of the opportunistic programme was £289 (combined sensitivity 63%, specificity 92%, compliance 78%, annual cost £99 981). The incremental cost effectiveness of completely replacing the opportunistic programme was £32. Absolute values of cost effectiveness were highly sensitive to varying prevalence, sensitivity and specificity, compliance, and programme size. Conclusion: Replacing existing programmes with systematic screening for diabetic eye disease is justified.

[1]  Dennis G. Fryback,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies for Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy , 1991, Medical care.

[2]  D R Owens,et al.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies? , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[3]  J. P. O’Hare,et al.  Adding retinal photography to screening for diabetic retinopathy: a prospective study in primary care , 1996, BMJ.

[4]  J C Javitt,et al.  Cost effectiveness of current approaches to the control of retinopathy in type I diabetics. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[5]  G. Murray,et al.  Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  D. Owens,et al.  A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[7]  Satya Prakash,et al.  BY DIFFERENT METHODS , 1977 .

[8]  M J Buxton,et al.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a relative cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative modalities and strategies. , 1992, Health economics.

[9]  J. Tooke,et al.  A Report on the Use of Technician Ophthalmoscopy Combined with the Use of the Canon Non‐mydriatic Camera in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy in the Community , 1995, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[10]  J. Welch,et al.  Instant electronic imaging systems are superior to polaroid at detecting sight‐threatening diabetic retinopathy , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  Keith A. Soper,et al.  Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. , 1982, JAMA.

[12]  W. Foulds,et al.  Diabetic retinopathy in the West of Scotland: its detection and prevalence, and the cost-effectiveness of a proposed screening programme. , 1983, Health bulletin.

[13]  J C Javitt,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening and Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy: What Are the Costs of Underutilization? , 1992, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[14]  N. Wald,et al.  Prevention of blindness by screening for diabetic retinopathy: a quantitative assessment. , 1989, BMJ.

[15]  D. Leonetti,et al.  Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  C. Jackson,et al.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy--comparison of a nurse and a doctor with retinal photography. , 1987, Diabetes research.

[17]  R. Davies,et al.  Simulation of diabetic eye disease to compare screening policies. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  S. Harding,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool diabetic eye study , 1995, BMJ.

[19]  S. Tesfaye,et al.  Screening for Diabetic Eye Disease by Optometrists Using Slit Lamps , 1997, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[20]  T. Williamson,et al.  Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy using an artificial neural network: a screening tool. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  A Relative Cost‐effectiveness Analysis of Different Methods of Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy , 1991, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[22]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Screening for Treatable Diabetic Retinopathy: a Comparison of Different Methods , 1991, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[23]  A S Kapadia,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening , 1992, Diabetes Care.