Examining the social acceptance of wind energy: Practical guidelines for onshore wind project development in France

This study investigates methods for increasing the local social acceptance of onshore wind projects in France. It is based on input from semi-structured research interviews and insight from a French wind energy company. That company had noted that a lack of local social acceptance of wind projects increased the risk of failures, cost escalation, and project delays. In this study, we first summarize recent scholarship concerning local social opposition and acceptance of wind energy through a selected literature review and case studies of wind projects throughout Europe. We then use this data to create guidelines on how to increase the likelihood of social acceptance for onshore wind project development in France, and to inform current debates in the energy studies literature over the acceptance of wind energy and energy transitions.

[1]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[2]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Renewable energy and the public , 1995 .

[3]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[4]  A. Jobert,et al.  Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies , 2007 .

[5]  Joseph Szarka,et al.  Why is there no wind rush in France , 2007 .

[6]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[7]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity , 2012 .

[8]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[9]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  The Offshore Wind Power Debate: Views from Cape Cod , 2005 .

[10]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in denmark , 2007 .

[11]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Exploring and Contextualizing Public Opposition to Renewable Electricity in the United States , 2009 .

[12]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Wind power planning, landscapes and publics , 2010 .

[13]  Nasrudin Abd Rahim,et al.  Environmental impact of wind energy , 2011 .

[14]  Tasneem Abbasi,et al.  Wind energy: Increasing deployment, rising environmental concerns , 2014 .

[15]  Candida Jones.  Vive LA wind , 2006 .

[16]  B. Sovacool.  What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[17]  Tore Wizelius,et al.  Developing Wind Power Projects , 2007 .

[18]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[19]  Mark Bradley,et al.  Optimising land use for wind farms , 2012 .

[20]  M. Saguan,et al.  Optimal wind power deployment in Europe-A portfolio approach , 2010 .

[21]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[22]  Mehmet Bilgili,et al.  Offshore wind power development in Europe and its comparison with onshore counterpart , 2011 .

[23]  Richard J. Evans,et al.  Map of bird sensitivities to wind farms in Scotland: A tool to aid planning and conservation , 2008 .

[24]  Jamil Khan,et al.  Wind power planning in three Swedish municipalities , 2003 .

[25]  M. A. Petrova,et al.  NIMBYism revisited: public acceptance of wind energy in the United States , 2013 .

[26]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Wind Turbines and Invisible Technology: Unarticulated Reasons for Local Opposition to Wind Energy , 2013 .

[27]  M. Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. , 2007 .

[28]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[29]  Toru Nakao,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Wind Power , 2011 .

[30]  Toby Bolsen,et al.  The Polls—Trends Public Opinion on Energy Policy: 1974–2006 , 2008 .

[31]  Alain Nadaï,et al.  “Planning”, “siting” and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case , 2007 .

[32]  Alain Nadaï,et al.  Wind power planning in France (Aveyron), from state regulation to local planning , 2009 .

[33]  K. Neuhoff.  Large-Scale Deployment of Renewables for Electricity Generation , 2005 .

[34]  James F. Manwell,et al.  Book Review: Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application , 2006 .

[35]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[36]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Construction of New Power Plants , 2009 .

[37]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[38]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Wind energy technology and current status : a review , 2000 .

[39]  Søren Krohn,et al.  On public attitudes towards wind power , 1999 .

[40]  Tanguy Hubert,et al.  Renewable Electricity Potentials in France: A Long Term Perspective , 2012 .

[41]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Diversity: Energy studies need social science , 2014, Nature.

[42]  Benjamin R. Jones,et al.  Energy Security, Equality and Justice , 2013 .

[43]  Michael Greenberg,et al.  Energy policy and research: The underappreciation of trust , 2014 .

[44]  Toby Bolsen,et al.  Public Opinion on Energy Policy, 1974-2006 , 2006 .

[45]  Fredrik Pettersson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable electricity in the presence of climate policy and technology learning: The case of Sweden , 2009 .