Unexpectedly High Subclonal Mutational Diversity in Human Colorectal Cancer and Its Significance

Human colorectal cancers (CRC) contain both clonal and subclonal mutations. Clonal mutations are positively selected, present in most cells and drive malignant progression. Subclonal mutations are randomly dispersed throughout the genome; they provide a vast reservoir of mutant cells that can expand, repopulate the tumor and result in the rapid emergence of resistance, as well as being a major contributor to tumor heterogeneity. Here, we apply Duplex Sequencing (DS) methodology to quantify subclonal mutations in CRC tumor with unprecedented depth (104) and accuracy (<10−7). We measured mutation frequencies in genes encoding replicative DNA polymerases and in genes frequently mutated in CRC, and found an unexpectedly high effective mutation rate, 7.1 × 10−7. The curve of subclonal mutation accumulation as a function of sequencing depth, using DNA obtained from five different tumors, is in accord with a neutral model of tumor evolution. We present a new theoretical approach to model neutral evolution independent of the infinite sites assumption (which states that a particular mutation arises only in one tumor cell at any given time). Our analysis indicates that the infinite sites assumption is not applicable once the number of tumor cells exceeds the reciprocal of the mutation rate, a circumstance relevant to even the smallest clinically diagnosable tumor. Our methods allow accurate estimation of the total mutation burden in clinical cancers. Our results indicate that no DNA locus is wild type in every malignant cell within a tumor at the time of diagnosis (probability of all cells wild type = 10−308). Significance Statement Cancers evolve many mutations. Clonal mutations are selected early. Subsequent evolution occurs in a branching fashion, possibly without selection (“neutral evolution”). Rarer mutations occur later on smaller branches of the evolutionary tree. Using a DNA sequencing method, duplex sequencing, with unprecedented accuracy and sensitivity, we quantified very rare unique subclonal mutations in diagnostic specimens from five human colorectal cancers. Rarer subclones probe later evolutionary timepoints than previously possible. We confirm neutral evolution at later times and find many more subclonal mutations than expected. A novel theoretical method allowed us to extrapolate further forward in time to diagnosis. At diagnosis, every base in DNA is mutated in at least one cancer cell. In particular any therapy resistance mutation would be present.

[1]  Peter J. Campbell,et al.  Somatic mutant clones colonize the human esophagus with age , 2018, Science.

[2]  H. Clevers,et al.  Intra-tumor diversification in colorectal cancer at the single-cell level. , 2018 .

[3]  Chuang Tan,et al.  Universal Patterns of Selection in Cancer and Somatic Tissues , 2018, Cell.

[4]  Matthew D. Young,et al.  Intra-tumour diversification in colorectal cancer at the single-cell level , 2018, Nature.

[5]  Arthur P. Grollman,et al.  Genome-wide quantification of rare somatic mutations in normal human tissues using massively parallel sequencing , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Quantifying Clonal and Subclonal Passenger Mutations in Cancer Evolution , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Marc J. Williams,et al.  Identification of neutral tumor evolution across cancer types , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Xuemei Lu,et al.  Extremely high genetic diversity in a single tumor points to prevalence of non-Darwinian cell evolution , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Studying clonal dynamics in response to cancer therapy using high-complexity barcoding , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[10]  Lawrence D True,et al.  Sequencing small genomic targets with high efficiency and extreme accuracy , 2015, Nature Methods.

[11]  C. Curtis,et al.  A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Timing and heterogeneity of mutations associated with drug resistance in metastatic cancers , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Brendan F. Kohrn,et al.  Detecting ultralow-frequency mutations by Duplex Sequencing , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[14]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[15]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of cancer in response to targeted combination therapy , 2013, eLife.

[16]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Half or more of the somatic mutations in cancers of self-renewing tissues originate prior to tumor initiation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Chen-Hsiang Yeang,et al.  Impact of genetic dynamics and single-cell heterogeneity on development of nonstandard personalized medicine strategies for cancer , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Jesse J. Salk,et al.  Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Johannes G. Reiter,et al.  The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers , 2012, Nature.

[20]  Jesse J Salk,et al.  Optimization of DNA polymerase mutation rates during bacterial evolution , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  R. Beckman Mutator Mutations Enhance Tumorigenic Efficiency across Fitness Landscapes , 2009, PloS one.

[22]  D. Wodarz,et al.  Combination therapies against chronic myeloid leukemia: short-term versus long-term strategies. , 2009, Cancer research.

[23]  M. Stratton,et al.  The cancer genome , 2009, Nature.

[24]  Amy E. Hawkins,et al.  DNA sequencing of a cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia genome , 2008, Nature.

[25]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways , 2008, Nature.

[26]  M. Stratton,et al.  Subclonal phylogenetic structures in cancer revealed by ultra-deep sequencing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Robert A Beckman,et al.  Cancers exhibit a mutator phenotype: clinical implications. , 2008, Cancer research.

[28]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Comparative lesion sequencing provides insights into tumor evolution , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  L. Loeb,et al.  Efficiency of carcinogenesis with and without a mutator mutation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  K. Sheahan,et al.  Mutually exclusive promoter hypermethylation patterns of hMLH1 and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase in colorectal cancer. , 2006, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[31]  Robert A Beckman,et al.  Genetic instability in cancer: theory and experiment. , 2005, Seminars in cancer biology.

[32]  P. Nowell The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. , 1976, Science.

[33]  L. Loeb,et al.  Errors in DNA replication as a basis of malignant changes. , 1974, Cancer research.

[34]  M. Kimura The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. , 1969, Genetics.

[35]  R. H. Levin,et al.  The effectiveness of combinations of antileukemic agents in inducing and maintaining remission in children with acute leukemia. , 1965, Blood.