Automated Pediatric Abdominal Effective Diameter Measurements Versus Age-Predicted Body Size for Normalization of CT Dose

There has been increasing interest in adjusting CT radiation dose data for patient body size. A method for automated computation of the abdominal effective diameter of a patient from a CT image has previously only been tested in adult patients. In this work, we tested the method on a set of 128 pediatric patients aged 0.8 to 12.9 years (average 8.0 years, SD = 3.7 years) who had CT abdomen/pelvis exams performed on a Toshiba Aquilion 64 scanner. For this set of patients, age-predicted abdominal effective diameter extrapolated based on data from the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements was a relatively poor predictor of measured effective diameter. The mean absolute percentage error between the CTDI normalization coefficient calculated from a manually measured effective diameter and the coefficient determined by age-predicted effective diameter was 12.3 % with respect to a 32 cm phantom (range 0.0–52.8 %, SD 8.7 %) and 12.9 % with respect to a 16 cm phantom (range 0.0–56.4 %, SD 9.2 %). In contrast, there is a close correspondence between the automated and manually measured patient effective diameters, with a mean absolute error of 0.6 cm (error range 0.2–1.3 cm). This correspondence translates into a high degree of correspondence between normalization coefficients determined by automated and manual measurements; the mean absolute percentage error was 2.1 % with respect to a 32 cm phantom (range 0.0–8.1 %, SD = 1.4 %) and 2.3 % with respect to a 16 cm phantom (range 0.0–9.3 %, SD = 1.6 %).

[1]  Samuel L Brady,et al.  Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. , 2012, Radiology.

[2]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. , 2012, Medical physics.

[3]  John M Boone,et al.  Reply to "Comment on the 'Report of AAPM TG 204: Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations'" [AAPM Report 204, 2011]. , 2012, Medical physics.

[4]  Claude Nahmias,et al.  Radiation Risk to Children From Computed Tomography , 2008, Pediatrics.

[5]  Appendix D: Reports Produced by the Health Protection Agency (Hpa) (Formerly National Radiological Protection Board, Nrpb) , 2005 .

[6]  Phillip M. Cheng,et al.  Automated Estimation of Abdominal Effective Diameter for Body Size Normalization of CT Dose , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  Keith J. Strauss,et al.  Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[8]  Keith J Strauss,et al.  Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children's hospital. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. , 2012, Medical physics.