Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in the understanding and practical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques. Nevertheless, to date, this experimental effort has not been accompanied by substantial reflections on the models and mechanisms that could explain the stimulation effects. Given these premises, the aim of this article is to provide an updated picture of what we know about the theoretical models of tES that have been proposed to date, contextualized in a more specific and unitary framework. We demonstrate that these models can explain the tES behavioral effects as distributed along a continuum from stimulation dependent to network activity dependent. In this framework, we also propose that stochastic resonance is a useful mechanism to explain the general online neuromodulation effects of tES. Moreover, we highlight the aspects that should be considered in future research. We emphasize that tES is not an “easy-to-use” technique; however, it may represent a very fruitful approach if applied within rigorous protocols, with deep knowledge of both the behavioral and cognitive aspects and the more recent advances in the application of stimulation.

[1]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  12 Random Noise Stimulation of the Cortex: Stochastic Resonance Enhances Central Mechanisms of Perception , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Pratik Y. Chhatbar,et al.  Data Synthesis in Meta-Analysis may Conclude Differently on Cognitive Effect From Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[4]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Non-linear effects of transcranial direct current stimulation as a function of individual baseline performance: Evidence from biparietal tDCS influence on lateralized attention bias , 2015, Cortex.

[5]  G. Thut,et al.  The implications of state-dependent tDCS effects in aging: Behavioural response is determined by baseline performance , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Conceptual and Procedural Shortcomings of the Systematic Review “Evidence That Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Generates Little-to-no Reliable Neurophysiologic Effect Beyond MEP Amplitude Modulation in Healthy Human Subjects: A Systematic Review” by Horvath and Co-workers , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[7]  Lucia M. Li,et al.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[8]  O. Carter,et al.  Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[9]  Ulf Ziemann,et al.  Metaplasticity in Human Cortex , 2015, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[10]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[11]  Maria Concetta Pellicciari,et al.  The Interaction With Task-induced Activity is More Important Than Polarization: A tDCS Study , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[12]  R. Hamilton,et al.  It's the Thought That Counts: Examining the Task-dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Executive Function , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[13]  W. Hall,et al.  Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews the Contribution of Tms–eeg Coregistration in the Exploration of the Human Cortical Connectome , 2022 .

[15]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  O. Carter,et al.  Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Eckart Altenmüller,et al.  Ceiling Effects Prevent Further Improvement of Transcranial Stimulation in Skilled Musicians , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Laura Pieroni,et al.  EEG mean frequency changes in healthy subjects during prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  Michael J. Banissy,et al.  Best of both worlds: promise of combining brain stimulation and brain connectome , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[21]  Bruce Luber,et al.  Neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation is not a net zero-sum proposition , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[22]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Is neural hyperpolarization by cathodal stimulation always detrimental at the behavioral level? , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[23]  Victoria Saigle,et al.  The Rising Tide of tDCS in the Media and Academic Literature , 2014, Neuron.

[24]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  C. Plewnia,et al.  Shaping Memory Accuracy by Left Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Not all brains are created equal: the relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[27]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition? , 2014, NeuroImage.

[28]  J. Kelso,et al.  The Metastable Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[29]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Studying the Effects of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Stroke Recovery Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  L. Parra,et al.  Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  M. Bikson,et al.  Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[32]  M. Bikson,et al.  Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[33]  Flavio Fröhlich,et al.  Emergence of Metastable State Dynamics in Interconnected Cortical Networks with Propagation Delays , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance? , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  C. Miniussi,et al.  The Role of Timing in the Induction of Neuromodulation in Perceptual Learning by Transcranial Electric Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[37]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Ladan Shams,et al.  Anodal tDCS to V1 blocks visual perceptual learning consolidation , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  The Mental Cost of Cognitive Enhancement , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  G. Fink,et al.  Modulation of Top-Down Control of Visual Attention by Cathodal tDCS over Right IPS , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  A. Antal,et al.  Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  M. Nitsche,et al.  The pharmacology of neuroplasticity induced by non‐invasive brain stimulation: building models for the clinical use of CNS active drugs , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  C. Miniussi,et al.  The Functional Importance of Rhythmic Activity in the Brain , 2012, Current Biology.

[46]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Unleashing Potential: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex Improves Change Detection in Low-Performing Individuals , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  L. Merabet,et al.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[48]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Random Noise Stimulation Improves Neuroplasticity in Perceptual Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  W. Paulus Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES – tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[51]  R. L. Pagano,et al.  Translational research in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a systematic review of studies in animals , 2011, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[52]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Behavioural facilitation following brain stimulation: Implications for neurorehabilitation , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[53]  O. Igoshin,et al.  Bistable responses in bacterial genetic networks: designs and dynamical consequences. , 2011, Mathematical biosciences.

[54]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[56]  Hideyuki Suzuki,et al.  Theory of hybrid dynamical systems and its applications to biological and medical systems , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[57]  F. Fregni,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation with Low-Intensity Electrical Currents: Putative Mechanisms of Action for Direct and Alternating Current Stimulation , 2010, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[58]  C. Miniussi,et al.  The mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognition , 2010, Cortex.

[59]  J. Rothwell,et al.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition , 2009, Cortex.

[60]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Enhancement of Planning Ability by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  C. Miniussi,et al.  New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS–EEG studies , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  M. Nitsche,et al.  D1-Receptor Impact on Neuroplasticity in Humans , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  V. Walsh,et al.  State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  S. Kuindersma,et al.  Recovery from monocular deprivation using binocular deprivation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Extracellular stimulation of mammalian neurons through repetitive activation of Na+ channels by weak capacitive currents on a silicon chip. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  Michael Okun,et al.  Instantaneous correlation of excitation and inhibition during ongoing and sensory-evoked activities , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[70]  S. Schiff,et al.  Sensitivity of Neurons to Weak Electric Fields , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Keiichi Kitajo,et al.  Behavioral stochastic resonance within the human brain. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[72]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[73]  J E Lisman,et al.  Three Ca2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man's land , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[74]  Wolfgang Maass,et al.  On the Computational Power of Winner-Take-All , 2000, Neural Computation.

[75]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[76]  I. Gartside,et al.  Mechanisms of Sustained Increases of Firing Rate of Neurones in the Rat Cerebral Cortex after Polarization: Reverberating Circuits or Modification of Synaptic Conductance? , 1968, Nature.

[77]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[78]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. , 1962, Experimental neurology.

[79]  M. Bear,et al.  Promoting neurological recovery of function via metaplasticity. , 2010, Future neurology.

[80]  N. D. Stein,et al.  Stochastic resonance , 1993, Scholarpedia.

[81]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .