Supervised Classification and Estimation of Hydrometeors From C-Band Dual-Polarized Radars: A Bayesian Approach

In this paper, a Bayesian statistical approach for supervised classification and estimation of hydrometeors, using a C-band polarimetric radar, is presented and discussed. The Bayesian Radar Algorithm for Hydrometeor Classification at C-band (BRAHCC) is supervised by a backscattering microphysical model, aimed at representing ten different hydrometeor classes in water, ice, and mixed phase. The expected error budget is evaluated by means of contingency tables on the basis of C-band radar noisy and attenuated synthetic data. Its accuracy is better than that obtained from a previously developed fuzzy logic C-band classification algorithm. As a second step of the overall retrieval algorithm, a multivariate regression is adopted to derive water content statistical estimators, exploiting simulated polarimetric radar data for each hydrometeor class. The BRAHCC methodology is then applied to a convective hail event, observed by two C-band dual-polarized radars in a network configuration. The hydrometeor classification along the line of sight, connecting the two C-band radars, is performed using the BRAHCC applied to path-attenuation-corrected data. Qualitative results are consistent with those derived from the fuzzy logic algorithm. Hydrometeor water content temporal evolution is tracked along the radar line of sight. Hail vertical occurrence is derived and compared with an empirical hail detection index applied along the radar connection line during the whole event.

[1]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[2]  Luca Baldini,et al.  Implementations of CSU hydrometeor classification scheme for C-band polarimetric radars , 2005 .

[3]  Eric A. Smith,et al.  Bayesian estimation of precipitating cloud parameters from combined measurements of spaceborne microwave radiometer and radar , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  Hydrometeor classification from dual-polarized weather radar: extending fuzzy logic from S-band to C-band data , 2006 .

[5]  Eugenio Gorgucci,et al.  Estimation of Raindrop Size Distribution Parameters from Polarimetric Radar Measurements , 2002 .

[6]  A. Witt,et al.  An Enhanced Hail Detection Algorithm for the WSR-88D , 1998 .

[7]  J. W. F. Goddard,et al.  Identification of hydrometeors and other targets by dual‐polarization radar , 1984 .

[8]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  Applied regression analysis (2. ed.) , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[9]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  Supervised Fuzzy-Logic Classification of Hydrometeors Using C-Band Weather Radars , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  J. W. Conway,et al.  A new C-band polarimetric radar with simultaneous transmission for hydrometeor classification and rainfall measurement , 2005 .

[11]  Eugenia Kalnay,et al.  Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability , 2002 .

[12]  I. Holleman,et al.  07 VERIFICATION OF RADAR-BASED HAIL DETECTION PRODUCT , 2005 .

[13]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Cloud Microphysics Retrieval Using S-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Measurements , 1999 .

[14]  Soumya Jana,et al.  SIGNAL DETECTION AND ESTIMATION , 2002 .

[15]  A. Waldvogel,et al.  Criteria for the Detection of Hail Cells , 1979 .

[16]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Evaluation of a New Polarimetrically Based Z–R Relation , 2004 .

[17]  Jerry M. Straka,et al.  Bulk Hydrometeor Classification and Quantification Using Polarimetric Radar Data: Synthesis of Relations , 2000 .

[18]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  Constrained iterative technique with embedded neural network for dual-polarization radar correction of rain path attenuation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Roy Rasmussen,et al.  Multiparameter radar measurements in Colorado convective storms. Part I. Graupel melting studies , 1986 .

[20]  T. A. Seliga,et al.  A Differential Reflectivity Radar Hall Measurement Technique: Observations during the Denver Hailstorm of 13 June 1984 , 1990 .

[21]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Validation of Polarimetric Hail Detection , 2006 .

[22]  Eugenio Gorgucci,et al.  Hydrometeor classification methodology for C-band polarimetric radars , 2004 .

[23]  Michele Galletti,et al.  Assessment and tuning of the behaviour of a microphysical characterisation scheme , 2005 .

[24]  Larry D. Travis,et al.  Capabilities and limitations of a current FORTRAN implementation of the T-matrix method for randomly oriented, rotationally symmetric scatterers , 1998 .

[25]  Jerry M. Straka,et al.  Testing a Procedure for Automatic Classification of Hydrometeor Types , 2001 .

[26]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Advantages of Rain Measurements Using Specific Differential Phase , 1996 .

[27]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Polarimetric Measurements in a Severe Hailstorm , 1993 .

[28]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[29]  P. P. Alberoni,et al.  Use of a fuzzy logic classification scheme with a C-band polarimetric radar: first results , 2002 .

[30]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Hydrometeor classification system using dual-polarization radar measurements: model improvements and in situ verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Jacques Testud,et al.  The Rain Profiling Algorithm Applied to Polarimetric Weather Radar , 2000 .

[32]  T. Keenan,et al.  Hydrometeor classification with a C-band polarimetric radar , 2003 .

[33]  R. Doviak,et al.  POLARIMETRIC DOPPLER WEATHER RADAR , 2022 .

[34]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[35]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Radar polarimetry at S, C, and X bands: Comparative analysis and operational implications , 2005 .

[36]  Jonathan J. Gourley.  Classification of hydrometeors and non-hydrometeors using polarimetric C-band radar , 2005 .

[37]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability , 2005, Technometrics.