Integrated Bayesian Multi-model approach to quantify input, parameter and conceptual model structure uncertainty in groundwater modeling

Abstract A flexible Integrated Bayesian Multi-model Uncertainty Estimation Framework (IBMUEF) is presented to simultaneously quantify conceptual model structure, input and parameter uncertainty of a groundwater flow model. In this fully Bayesian framework, the DiffeRential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM) algorithm with a novel likelihood function is combined with Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). Four alternative conceptual models, representing different geological representations of an overexploited aquifer, have been developed. The uncertainty of the input of the model is represented by multipliers. A novel likelihood function based on a new heteroscedastic error model is included to extend the applicability of the framework. The results of the study confirm that neglecting conceptual model structure uncertainty results in unreliable prediction. Consideration of both model structure and input uncertainty are important to obtain confident parameter sets and better model predictions. This study shows that the IBMUEF provides more reliable model predictions and accurate uncertainty bounds.

[1]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  P. A. Domenico,et al.  Water from low‐permeability sediments and land subsidence , 1965 .

[3]  P. Mantovan,et al.  Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology , 2006 .

[4]  Ming Ye,et al.  Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of spatial variability models in unsaturated fractured tuff , 2003 .

[5]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .

[6]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Bayesian model averaging assessment on groundwater management under model structure uncertainty , 2010 .

[7]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Constructive epistemic modeling of groundwater flow with geological structure and boundary condition uncertainty under the Bayesian paradigm , 2014 .

[8]  C. Voss,et al.  Estimation of regional-scale groundwater flow properties in the Bengal Basin of India and Bangladesh , 2009 .

[9]  M. Huysmans,et al.  Identification of the influencing factors on groundwater drought and depletion in north-western Bangladesh , 2017, Hydrogeology Journal.

[10]  Ming Ye,et al.  Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy , 2012 .

[11]  Philip John Binning,et al.  Uncertainty evaluation of mass discharge estimates from a contaminated site using a fully Bayesian framework , 2010 .

[12]  Alain Dassargues,et al.  Conceptual model uncertainty in groundwater modeling: Combining generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation and Bayesian model averaging , 2008 .

[13]  D. Mallants,et al.  Efficient posterior exploration of a high‐dimensional groundwater model from two‐stage Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and polynomial chaos expansion , 2013 .

[14]  M. Huysmans,et al.  Combined deficit irrigation and soil fertility management on different soil textures to improve wheat yield in drought-prone Bangladesh , 2017 .

[15]  K. Jensen,et al.  The importance of alternative conceptual models for simulation of concentrations in a multi-aquifer system , 2007 .

[16]  H. Akaike Markovian Representation of Stochastic Processes and Its Application to the Analysis of Autoregressive Moving Average Processes , 1974 .

[17]  Petros Gaganis,et al.  Evaluation of the uncertainty of groundwater model predictions associated with conceptual errors: A per-datum approach to model calibration , 2006 .

[18]  W. Nowak,et al.  Model selection on solid ground: Rigorous comparison of nine ways to evaluate Bayesian model evidence , 2014, Water resources research.

[19]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Effective Groundwater Model Calibration: With Analysis of Data, Sensitivities, Predictions, and Uncertainty , 2007 .

[20]  A. Raftery,et al.  Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles , 2005 .

[21]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[22]  Nima Chitsazan,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayesian Model Averaging Framework for Groundwater Prediction under Uncertainty , 2015, Ground water.

[23]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian model averaging for hydrostratigraphic modeling: Uncertainty segregation and comparative evaluation , 2013 .

[24]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Comparison of point forecast accuracy of model averaging methods in hydrologic applications , 2010 .

[25]  J. Stedinger,et al.  Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method , 2008 .

[26]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? , 2009 .

[27]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Saltwater scavenging optimization under surrogate uncertainty for a multi-aquifer system , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[28]  David Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Ranking and Inference in Ground Water Modeling , 2004, Ground water.

[29]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  The hydrologist’s guide to Bayesian model selection, averaging and combination , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[30]  Bruce A. Robinson,et al.  Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: Comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[31]  Liang Xue,et al.  A multimodel data assimilation framework via the ensemble Kalman filter , 2014 .

[32]  M. M. Hasan,et al.  Multi-model approach to quantify groundwater-level prediction uncertainty using an ensemble of global climate models and multiple abstraction scenarios , 2019, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[33]  Shamsuddin Shahid Spatial assessment of groundwater demand in Northwest Bangladesh , 2010 .

[34]  O. Batelaan,et al.  A distributed monthly water balance model: formulation and application on Black Volta Basin , 2017, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[35]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[36]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Application , 2006 .

[37]  D. L. Peck,et al.  Specific Yield Compilation of Specific Yields for Various Materials , 1967 .

[38]  Ming Ye,et al.  A Model‐Averaging Method for Assessing Groundwater Conceptual Model Uncertainty , 2010, Ground water.

[39]  W. Nowak,et al.  A statistical concept to assess the uncertainty in Bayesian model weights and its impact on model ranking , 2015 .

[40]  D. Kavetski,et al.  Towards a Bayesian total error analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Characterising model error using storm-dependent parameters , 2006 .

[41]  Yangxiao Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of alternative conceptual models for groundwater modelling , 2017 .

[42]  Alberto Montanari,et al.  Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall‐runoff simulations , 2005 .

[43]  Jing Yang,et al.  Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China , 2008 .

[44]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models , 2013, Statistics and Computing.

[45]  Narayan Kumar Shrestha,et al.  Assessment of the different sources of uncertainty in a SWAT model of the River Senne (Belgium) , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[47]  X. Zeng,et al.  Review of the uncertainty analysis of groundwater numerical simulation , 2013 .

[48]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of uncertain model predictions , 2003 .

[49]  David Draper,et al.  Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty , 2011 .

[50]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[51]  Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen,et al.  Operational real‐time modeling with ensemble Kalman filter of variably saturated subsurface flow including stream‐aquifer interaction and parameter updating , 2011 .

[52]  Okke Batelaan,et al.  GIS-based recharge estimation by coupling surface–subsurface water balances , 2007 .

[53]  Srikanta Mishra,et al.  Model Averaging Techniques for Quantifying Conceptual Model Uncertainty , 2010, Ground water.

[54]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[55]  Ground Water Flow Modeling with Sensitivity Analyses to Guide Field Data Collection in a Mountain Watershed , 2007 .

[56]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory , 2006 .

[57]  J C Refsgaard,et al.  Model uncertainty--parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[58]  J. Nossent,et al.  Estimation and Impact Assessment of Input and Parameter Uncertainty in Predicting Groundwater Flow With a Fully Distributed Model , 2017, Water Resources Research.

[59]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Bayesian model averaging for groundwater head prediction and uncertainty analysis using multimodel and multimethod , 2009 .

[60]  Luk Peeters,et al.  Application of a multimodel approach to account for conceptual model and scenario uncertainties in groundwater modelling , 2010 .

[61]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error , 2004 .

[62]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[63]  J. Bredehoeft The conceptualization model problem—surprise , 2005 .

[64]  Wasserman,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[65]  Qingyun Duan,et al.  An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction , 2006 .

[66]  H. Madsen,et al.  Bias-aware data assimilation in integrated hydrological modelling , 2018 .

[67]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Hydrologic data assimilation using particle Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation: Theory, concepts and applications (online first) , 2012 .

[68]  Karel J. Keesman,et al.  Uncertainty propagation and speculation in projective forecasts of environmental change - a lake eutrophication example. , 1991 .

[69]  Dirk Mallants,et al.  Hydrogeological conceptual model building and testing: A review , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[70]  C. Turnadge,et al.  When to Account for Boundary Conditions in Estimating Hydraulic Properties from Head Observations? , 2019, Ground water.

[71]  C. Voss,et al.  Controls on groundwater flow in the Bengal Basin of India and Bangladesh: regional modeling analysis , 2009 .