Is there a place for pudendal nerve maximal electrical stimulation for the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury patients?

The aim of the study is to determine whether pudendal nerve maximal electrical stimulation (MES) could represent an alternative treatment for detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Six suprasacral SCI patients participated in the study. The treatment consisted of daily stimulation periods of 20 min, repeated five times a week, during 4 weeks, with continuous electrical stimulation of the penis or of the clitoris via bipolar surface electrodes (rectangular stimuli of 0.5 ms pulse duration, 5 Hz frequency), with the maximum tolerable stimulation strength (under the level of pain). In two patients, additional stimulation was administrated by means of an anal plug during the last 2 weeks. The stimulus strengths ranged from 35 to 99 mA (mean 54 mA). One patient stopped MES after 2 weeks. At the end of the treatment, neither the cystometric bladder capacities (153 ml vs 157 ml) nor the micturition charts had significantly improved for the five remaining patients. Only two patients experienced non lasting improvement of nocturia at some time of the treatment. In conclusion, we were not able to demonstrate the efficacy of MES in inhibiting detrusor hyperreflexia in SCI patients. To reach therapeutic effects, other parameters may be needed, such as higher stimulation strengths (currents above or equal to 99 mA) or other currents (such as interferential therapy). Chronic stimulation with external or implanted electrodes using lower currents may represent an alternative.

[1]  D. Vodušek,et al.  Detrusor inhibition induced by stimulation of pudendal nerve afferents , 1986 .

[2]  S. Bergmann,et al.  Maximal electrostimulation of the pelvic floor in female idiopathic detrusor instability and urge incontinence , 1989 .

[3]  S. Lindström,et al.  Electrical stimulation. A physiologic approach to the treatment of urinary incontinence. , 1991, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[4]  H. Van Poppel,et al.  Interferential therapy for detrusor hyperreflexia in multiple sclerosis. , 1985, Urology.

[5]  R. Vereecken,et al.  Electrical sphincter stimulation in the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia of paraplegics , 1987 .

[6]  J. Walter,et al.  Management of incontinent SCI patients with penile stimulation: preliminary results. , 1994, The Journal of the American Paraplegia Society.

[7]  M. Fall,et al.  Effects of external and direct pudendal nerve maximal electrical stimulation in the treatment of the uninhibited overactive bladder. , 1989, British journal of urology.

[8]  D. Merrill The treatment of detrusor incontinence by electrical stimulation. , 1979, The Journal of urology.

[9]  G. Primus,et al.  Maximal external electrical stimulation for treatment of neurogenic or non‐neurogenic urgency and/or urge incontinence , 1996, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[10]  Stanislav Plevnik,et al.  Maximal electrical stimulation for urinary incontinence , 1979 .

[11]  J. L. Vanhee,et al.  Short-term effect of pudendal nerve electrical stimulation on detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury patients: importance of current strength , 1996, Paraplegia.

[12]  P. Vrtačnik,et al.  Short-term maximal electrical stimulation for urinary retention. , 1984, Urology.

[13]  J S Walter,et al.  Bladder inhibition by penile nerve stimulation in spinal cord injury patients. , 1992, The Journal of urology.