The effects of context, meaning frequency, and associative strength on semantic selection: Distinct contributions from each cerebral hemisphere

The visual half-field procedure was used to examine hemispheric asymmetries in meaning selection. Event-related potentials were recorded as participants decided if a lateralized ambiguous or unambiguous prime was related in meaning to a centrally presented target. Prime-target pairs were preceded by a related or unrelated centrally presented context word. To separate the effects of meaning frequency and associative strength, unambiguous words were paired with concordant weakly related context words and strongly related targets (e.g., taste-sweet-candy) that were similar in associative strength to discordant subordinate-related context words and dominant-related targets (e.g., river-bank-deposit) in the ambiguous condition. Context words and targets were reversed in a second experiment. In an unrelated (neutral) context, N400 responses were more positive than baseline (facilitated) in all ambiguous conditions except when subordinate targets were presented on left visual field-right hemisphere (LVF-RH) trials. Thus, in the absence of biasing context information, the hemispheres seem to be differentially affected by meaning frequency, with the left maintaining multiple meanings and the right selecting the dominant meaning. In the presence of discordant context information, N400 facilitation was absent in both visual fields, indicating that the contextually consistent meaning of the ambiguous word had been selected. In contrast, N400 facilitation occurred in all of the unambiguous conditions; however, the left hemisphere (LH) showed less facilitation for the weakly related target when a strongly related context was presented. These findings indicate that both hemispheres use context to guide meaning selection, but the LH is more likely to focus activation on a single, contextually relevant sense.

[1]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Assessing the Role of Hemispheric Specialisation, Serial-Position Processing, and Retinal Eccentricity in Lateralised Word RecognitioN , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[3]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access , 2002 .

[5]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[7]  G. Simpson,et al.  Inhibitory processes in the recognition of homograph meanings. , 1994 .

[8]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[9]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  D. Deacon,et al.  Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  P. Tabossi.  Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts , 1988 .

[13]  Working Memory and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution as Revealed by ERPs: A Difficult Case for Activation Theories , 2003 .

[14]  J. Grafman,et al.  Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Cerebral Mechanisms for Suppression of Inappropriate Information during Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Brain and Language.

[16]  R. Atchley,et al.  Using event-related potentials to examine hemispheric differences in semantic processing , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca’s aphasia , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  J. Grose-Fifer,et al.  Evidence for a New Conceptualization of Semantic Representation in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2004, Cortex.

[21]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Repeated homographs in word and sentence contexts: Multiple processing of multiple meanings. , 2001 .

[22]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Representation of Polysemous Words , 2001 .

[23]  J. Coney,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the resolution of lexical ambiguity , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[25]  Remco J. Renken,et al.  Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[26]  C. Burgess,et al.  The effect of time course and context on the facilitation of semantic features in the cerebral hemispheres. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[27]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Bihemispheric processing of redundant bilateral lexical information. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[28]  P. Dixon,et al.  University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[29]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[30]  C. Chiarello.  Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access: Automatic and controlled priming , 1985, Brain and Language.

[31]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  What happens to the unselected meaning of an ambiguous word in skilled reading , 2001 .

[32]  M. Koivisto.  Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  M. Jung-Beeman.  Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Priming of strong semantic relations in the left and right visual fields: a time-course investigation , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Atsuko Nakagawa.  Role of Anterior and Posterior Attention Networks in Hemispheric Asymmetries during Lexical Decisions , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[37]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension , 1975 .

[38]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple priming of lexically ambiguous and unambiguous targets in the cerebral hemispheres: The coarse coding hypothesis revisited , 2007, Brain Research.

[39]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Understanding words in sentence contexts: The time course of ambiguity resolution , 2003, Brain and Language.

[40]  Helen J. Chenery,et al.  Hemispheric Contributions to Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Evidence from Individuals with Complex Language Impairment Following Left-Hemisphere Lesions , 2002, Brain and Language.

[41]  Kara D. Federmeier.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[42]  G. Murphy,et al.  Paper has been my ruin: Conceptual relations of polysemous senses , 2002 .

[43]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  Processing homonymy and polysemy: Effects of sentential context and time-course following unilateral brain damage , 2005, Brain and Language.

[44]  M I Posner,et al.  Topography of the N400: brain electrical activity reflecting semantic expectancy. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  Shari R Baum,et al.  Sensitivity to local sentence context information in lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from left- and right-hemisphere-damaged individuals , 2003, Brain and Language.

[46]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Methodological issues in the study of lexical ambiguity resolution. , 2001 .

[47]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Meaning , 2007 .

[48]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  M. Kutas,et al.  Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation ☆ ☆☆ , 1987 .

[51]  D. Balota,et al.  Summation of activation: evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  D. Gorfein.  On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. , 2001 .

[53]  P. Holcomb.  Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming , 1988, Brain and Language.

[54]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[56]  C. Tompkins,et al.  Hemispheric differences in word‐meaning processing: Alternative interpretations of current evidence , 2006, Aphasiology.

[57]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[58]  M. Faust,et al.  Sentence priming effects in the two cerebral hemispheres: influences of lexical relatedness, word order, and sentence anomaly , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995 .

[60]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[61]  D. Salisbury,et al.  Contextual modulation of N400 amplitude to lexically ambiguous words , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[62]  A. Baumgaertner,et al.  Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: suppression in inferential ambiguity resolution. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[63]  Sarah Bouaffre,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the time-course of semantic priming processes: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs) , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[64]  J. Filoteo,et al.  Semantic priming in patients with right frontal lobe lesions , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[65]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words , 2007, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[66]  Susanne Wagner,et al.  Determining inhibition: Individual differences in the 'lexicon context' trade-off during lexical ambiguity resolution in working memory. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[67]  D. Swinney,et al.  Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension. , 1976 .

[68]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[70]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  D. J. Bennett,et al.  Mediated priming in younger and older adults. , 1999, Experimental aging research.