Learning Causal Models via Progressive Alignment & Qualitative Modeling : A Simulation

Learning causal models is one of the central problems of cognitive science. We describe a simulation of early learning in physical domains from observations that uses progressive alignment and qualitative modeling to derive plausible causal models from observations. We show how protohistories can be created via progressive alignment and used with covariance algorithms to infer causality. The result, a causal corpus described using qualitative representations, can make simple predictions and set the stage for more sophisticated later models. The simulation has been successfully tested with three learning problems, with encouraging results.

[1]  J. Piaget The Child's Conception of Physical Causality , 1927 .

[2]  Pat Langley,et al.  Data-Driven Discovery of Physical Laws , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Five generalizations about cognitive development. , 1983 .

[4]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Learning Physical Domains: Toward a Theoretical Framework. , 1986 .

[5]  Douglas Hayes Fisher,et al.  Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering : a dussertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree doctor of philosophy in information and computer science , 1987 .

[6]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[7]  Kenneth D. Forbus Qualitative Process Theory , 1984, Artificial Intelligence.

[8]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[9]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution , 1995, Cognition.

[10]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison and Categorization in the Development of Relational Similarity , 1996 .

[12]  Shanks,et al.  The rational analysis of human causal and probability judgment , 1998 .

[13]  C. Glymour,et al.  Causal Mechanism and Probability: A Normative Approach , 1998 .

[14]  Nicola Fanizzi,et al.  Conceptual Change in Learning Naive Physics: The Computational Model as a Theory Revision Process , 1999, AI*IA.

[15]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  SEQL: Category learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping , 2000 .

[16]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[17]  Sven E. Kuehne Capturing QP-relevant Information from Natural Language Text , 2004 .

[18]  David M. Sobel,et al.  A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. , 2004, Psychological review.

[19]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Transforming between Propositions and Features: Bridging the Gap , 2005, AAAI.

[20]  T. Griffiths,et al.  NAÏVE THEORIES, AMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE Page 1 Running head: NAÏVE THEORIES AND AMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE Can being scared make your tummy ache? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence and preschoolers’ causal inferences , 2007 .