Omnidirectional multibeam sonar monitoring: applications in fisheries science

Data exploitation, acquired by medium-frequency omnidirectional multibeam sonar, enables original studies in fisheries research but is seldom used despite the fact that such equipment is found on most fishing vessels and a number of research vessels. This is the only system for real-time monitoring of fish schools within a horizontal omnidirectional plane about a vessel or a buoy. Between 1996 and 2001, we used two standard omnidirectional sonars and developed new methodologies for exploiting their specific acoustic data according to two main sampling schemes: ‘prospecting’, including fishing and searching operations, and ‘drifting’, as with an instrumental buoy system or aboard a stationary vessel. We present a complete method for continuous data acquisition from aboard a research vessel or commercial boat, with automated data extraction by picture analysis and a data processing method. Two cases of data analysis are considered: the first on a school-by-school basis, the ‘single school’ mode; the second taking into account all fish schools detected within the sonar sampling volume, the ‘cluster’ mode. Elementary sonar information is divided into five categories that comprise 24 survey and sonar parameters and 55 school, cluster and fisher behaviour descriptors. We review the applications of these categories and discuss perspectives for their use in fisheries science. If the sonar system enables the evaluation of the effects of vessel avoidance on fish school biomass assessment, no accurate abundance estimate can be provided by a simple sonar echo-integration process. Omnidirectional sonar data can be used to analyse collectively the fish schools’ swimming speed, kinematics in terms of diffusion and migration, aggregative dynamics as school splitting and merging indexes, spatial characteristics of clusters such as school density, 2D structure and fisher behaviour. The prospect of integrating such data into a fish school database, including multifrequency echo-sounder and lateral multibeam (3D) sonar data combined with a species recognition method, will enable a complete view of fish school behaviour and consequently the adoption of accurate fisheries management methods.

[1]  Daniel Gaertner,et al.  Influence of fishers’ behaviour on the catchability of surface tuna schools in the Venezuelan purse-seiner fishery in the Caribbean Sea , 1999 .

[2]  David G. Reid,et al.  Image Analysis Techniques for the Study of Fish School Structure from Acoustic Survey Data , 1993 .

[3]  Leif Nøttestad,et al.  Herring schooling manoeuvres in response to killer whale attacks , 1999 .

[4]  D. E. Lennard.  Jane's ocean technology 1976-77: edited by Robert L. Trillo 679 pages, £25.00, 1976, Macdonald and Jane's, London, UK , 1977 .

[5]  Larry A. Mayer,et al.  Commercial fishing vessels, automatic acoustic logging systems and 3D data visualization , 2002 .

[6]  Noël Diner,et al.  MOVIES-B: an acoustic detection description software. Application to shoal species' classification , 1993 .

[7]  E. John Simmonds,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[8]  N. Cochrane,et al.  Quantification of a multibeam sonar for fisheries assessment applications. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  N. Handegard,et al.  Possible vessel avoidance behaviour of capelin in a feeding area and on a spawning ground , 2004 .

[10]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  From two dimensions to three: the use of multibeam sonar for a new approach in fisheries acoustics , 1999 .

[11]  Hiromi Seno,et al.  Mathematical analysis on fish shoaling by a density-dependent diffusion model , 1995 .

[12]  David G. Reid.  Report on Echo Trace Classification , 2000 .

[13]  R. Mitson.  Underwater noise of research vessels:Review and recommendations , 1995 .

[14]  Bakun,et al.  The “school trap”: a mechanism promoting large-amplitude out-of-phase population oscillations of small pelagic fish species , 1999 .

[15]  S. Georgakarakos,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools , 1996 .

[16]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[17]  Tony J. Pitcher,et al.  The impact of pelagic fish behaviour on fisheries , 1995 .

[18]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Dynamics of pelagic fish distribution and behaviour : effects on fisheries and stock assessment , 1999 .

[19]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  A General Model for Simulation of Stock and Fleet Dynamics in Spatially Heterogeneous Fisheries , 1987 .

[20]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Mapping the shape, size, and density of fish schools by echo integration and a high-resolution sonar , 1995 .

[21]  Villy Christensen.  Virtual population reality , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[22]  Richard H. Love,et al.  A model for estimating distributions of fish school target strengths , 1978 .

[23]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Swimming behaviour of fish schools in the North Sea during acoustic surveying and pelagic trawl sampling , 1992 .

[24]  P. G. Fernandes,et al.  Oceanography: Fish do not avoid survey vessels , 2000, Nature.

[25]  Dezhang Chu,et al.  Protocols for calibrating multibeam sonar. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Hauke Reuter,et al.  SELFORGANIZATION OF FISH SCHOOLS : AN OBJECT-ORIENTED MODEL , 1994 .

[27]  John K. Horne,et al.  A method for evaluating the effects of biological factors on fish target strength , 2003 .

[28]  Michel Dreyfus-León,et al.  Individual-based modelling of fishermen search behaviour with neural networks and reinforcement learning , 1999 .

[29]  K. Foote.  Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation : a practical guide , 1987 .

[30]  T. Pitcher.  Behaviour of Teleost Fishes , 1986 .

[31]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Review of fish associative behaviour: Toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis , 2000, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[32]  Daniel Gaertner,et al.  The behavioural dynamics of fishers: management implications , 2004 .

[33]  Darren M Gillis,et al.  Ideal free distributions in fleet dynamics: a behavioral perspective on vessel movement in fisheries analysis , 2003 .

[34]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Recording fish schools by multi-beam sonar: potential for validating and supplementing echo integration recordings of schooling fish , 2000 .

[35]  Patrice Brehmer,et al.  Concept and preliminary analysis on omnidirectional sonar data , 2000 .

[36]  Mark V. Trevorrow,et al.  Intermediate range fish detection with a 12-kHz sidescan sonar , 1999 .

[37]  John K. Horne,et al.  Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: a review , 2000 .

[38]  Ingolf Røttingen.  On the relation between echo intensity and fish density , 1976 .

[39]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Underwater acoustics in marine fisheries and fisheries research , 1997, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[41]  J. Sibert,et al.  Mobility of tropical tunas and the implications for fisheries management , 2003 .

[42]  Petter Fossum,et al.  Pretty patterns but a simple strategy: predator- prey interactions between juvenile herring and Atlantic puffins observed with multibeam sonar , 2001 .

[43]  Horst Bunke,et al.  Handbook of Character Recognition and Document Image Analysis , 1997 .

[44]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Swimming behaviour of schools related to fish capture and acoustic abundance estimation , 1991 .

[45]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  Observation and extraction of three‐dimensional information on fish schools , 1999 .

[46]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Migration behaviour of norwegian spring spawning herring when entering the cold front in the Norwegian Sea , 1997 .

[47]  Akira Hamano,et al.  Improvement in school‐size estimates of pelagic fish using information from sector‐scanning sonar , 2002 .

[48]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  Lévy trajectories of Peruvian purse-seiners as an indicator of the spatial distribution of anchovy ( Engraulis ringens ) , 2005 .

[49]  Mark V. Trevorrow,et al.  CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF FISH IN A SHALLOW CHANNEL USING A FIXED HORIZONTAL SONAR , 1999 .

[50]  Pierre Petitgas,et al.  Geostatistics in fisheries survey design and stock assessment: models, variances and applications , 2001 .

[51]  R. Mitson,et al.  Causes and effects of underwater noise on fish abundance estimation , 2003 .

[52]  Andreas Huth,et al.  THE SIMULATION OF FISH SCHOOLS IN COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994 .

[53]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Towards sustainability in world fisheries , 2002, Nature.

[54]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Recording the migration behaviour of fish schools by multi-beam sonar during conventional acoustic surveys , 1995 .

[55]  O. Godø,et al.  What Can Technology Offer the Future Fisheries Scientist – Possibilities for Obtaining Better Estimates of Stock Abundance by Direct Observations , 1998 .

[56]  Rune Vabø,et al.  An individual based model of fish school reactions: predicting antipredator behaviour as observed in nature , 1997 .

[57]  J. Coetzee.  Use of a shoal analysis and patch estimation system (SHAPES) to characterise sardine schools , 2000 .

[58]  Anders Fernö,et al.  Marine fish behaviour in capture and abundance estimation , 1994 .

[59]  E. Ona,et al.  Estimation and compensation models for the shadowing effect in dense fish aggregations , 2003 .

[60]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  Are stock assessment methods too complicated , 2004 .

[61]  Patrice Brehmer,et al.  New applications of hydroacoustic methods for monitoring shallow water aquatic ecosystems: the case of mussel culture grounds , 2003 .

[62]  A. Bertrand,et al.  From small‐scale habitat loopholes to decadal cycles: a habitat‐based hypothesis explaining fluctuation in pelagic fish populations off Peru , 2004 .

[63]  Larry A. Mayer,et al.  3D visualization for pelagic fisheries research and assessment , 2002 .