Medical display application for degraded image sharpness restoration based on the modulation transfer function: initial assessment for a five-megapixel mammography display monitor

An image-display application for medical liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors called the sharpness recovery (SR) function has been developed to compensate for image sharpness as a function of deficiencies in the modulation transfer function (MTF) of a monitor. We investigated the effects of the SR function for a five-megapixel (MP) mammography LCD monitor on the resolution and noise properties of the displayed images by measuring the MTF and overall noise power spectrum (NPS), respectively. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the SR function for the 5-MP monitor in displaying subtle microcalcifications on digital mammograms was verified using a two-alternative-forced-choice sensitivity measurement as an initial application for medical image interpretation. Four radiologists compared the visibility of 45 regions of interest with a malignant microcalcification cluster shown on SR-processed and unprocessed mammograms. SR processing improved the MTF of the displayed images by approximately 40% at the Nyquist frequency of the 5-MP monitor, whereas it slightly increased the overall NPS values. All observers indicated that the fraction of cases considered to have better visibility of microcalcifications with the SR processing was significantly greater than that without the processing (averaging 82%, with the 95% confidence interval ranging from 70 to 93%). The SR processing for the 5-MP monitor yielded a significant improvement in the resolution properties of the displayed images, with a certain increase in the image noise. The SR function has the potential to improve the observer performance of radiologists, particularly when reading subtle microcalcifications reproduced on 5-MP monitors.

[1]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Display of mammograms on a CRT , 2003 .

[2]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Noise estimation and reduction on five medical liquid-crystal displays , 2006 .

[3]  K. Doi,et al.  Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. , 2007, Medical physics.

[4]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  A New Resolution Enhancement Technology Using the Independent Sub-Pixel Driving for the Medical Liquid Crystal Displays , 2008, Journal of Display Technology.

[5]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. , 2005, Medical physics.

[6]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  Tom R. Miller,et al.  Design and application of finite impulse response digital filters , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  MTF correction for optimizing softcopy display of digital mammograms: use of a vision model for predicting observer performance , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Hartwig R. Blume,et al.  Filmless digital chest radiography within the radiology department , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Junji Morishita,et al.  A method for evaluating image quality of monochrome and color displays based on luminance by use of a commercially available color digital camera. , 2015, Medical physics.

[11]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Observer Study for Evaluating Potential Utility of a Super-High-Resolution LCD in the Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Digital Mammograms , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  Yoshie Kodera,et al.  MTF measurement method for medical displays by using a bar-pattern image , 2006 .

[13]  Jiahua Fan,et al.  Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[14]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I. Modulation transfer function. , 1984, Medical physics.

[15]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Yoshie Kodera,et al.  Analysis method of noise power spectrum for medical monochrome liquid crystal displays , 2008, Radiological physics and technology.

[17]  Paul G Nagy,et al.  Imaging Physics , 2019, X-ray Microscopy.

[18]  Akiko Ihori,et al.  Phantom-based comparison of conventional versus phase-contrast mammography for LCD soft-copy diagnosis , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[19]  Yoshie Kodera,et al.  Noise reduction effect in super-high resolution LCDs using independent sub-pixel driving technology , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.