Three-Dimensional Stochastic Characterization of Shale SEM Images

Complexity in shale-gas reservoirs lies in the presence of multiscale networks of pores that vary from nanometer to micrometer scale. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and atomic force microscope imaging are promising tools for a better understanding of such complex microstructures. Obtaining 3D shale images using focused ion beam-SEM for accurate reservoir forecasting and petrophysical assessment is not, however, currently economically feasible. On the other hand, high-quality 2D shale images are widely available. In this paper, a new method based on higher-order statistics of a porous medium (as opposed to the traditional two-point statistics) is proposed in which a single 2D image of a shale sample is used to reconstruct stochastically equiprobable 3D models of the sample. Because some pores may remain undetected in the SEM images, data from other sources, such as the pore-size distribution obtained from nitrogen adsorption data, are integrated with the overall pore network using an object-based technique. The method benefits from a recent algorithm, the cross- correlation-based simulation, by which high-quality, unconditional/conditional realizations of a given sample porous medium are produced. To improve the ultimate 3D model, a novel iterative algorithm is proposed that refines the quality of the realizations significantly. Furthermore, a new histogram matching, which deals with multimodal continuous properties in shale samples, is also proposed. Finally, quantitative comparison is made by computing various statistical and petrophysical properties for the original samples, as well as the reconstructed model.

[1]  Dominik Endres,et al.  A new metric for probability distributions , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  M. Blunt,et al.  Prediction of permeability for porous media reconstructed using multiple-point statistics. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[4]  Alan R. Butcher,et al.  FIB/SEM and SEM/EDX: a New Dawn for the SEM in the Core Lab? , 2011 .

[5]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  Spatial Connectivity: From Variograms to Multiple-Point Measures , 2003 .

[6]  M. Sahimi,et al.  Cross-correlation function for accurate reconstruction of heterogeneous media. , 2013, Physical Review Letters.

[7]  David F. R. Mildner,et al.  Small‐angle scattering studies of the pore spaces of shaly rocks , 1986 .

[8]  Muhammad Sahimi,et al.  Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock: From Classical Methods to Modern Approaches , 1995 .

[9]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Multiple-point geostatistical modeling based on the cross-correlation functions , 2012, Computational Geosciences.

[10]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Atomic-Force Microscopy: A New Tool for Gas-Shale Characterization , 2012 .

[11]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  MS-CCSIM: Accelerating pattern-based geostatistical simulation of categorical variables using a multi-scale search in Fourier space , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  F. Javadpour Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone) , 2009 .

[14]  M. E. Naraghi,et al.  A stochastic permeability model for the shale-gas systems , 2015 .

[15]  Stephen C. Ruppel,et al.  Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores , 2012 .

[16]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Geostatistical Simulation and Reconstruction of Porous Media by a Cross-Correlation Function and Integration of Hard and Soft Data , 2015, Transport in Porous Media.

[17]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using a single thin section. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Reconstruction of nonstationary disordered materials and media: Watershed transform and cross-correlation function. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.