Social life cycle assessment of first and second-generation ethanol production technologies in Brazil

PurposeThe main goal of this study is to suggest quantitative social metrics to evaluate different sugarcane biorefinery systems in Brazil by exploring a novel hybrid approach integrating social life cycle assessment and input-output analysis.MethodsSocial life cycle assessment is the main methodology for evaluating social aspects based on a life-cycle approach. Using this framework, a hybrid model integrating social life cycle assessment and input-output analysis was introduced to evaluate different social effects of biorefinery scenarios considering workers as the stakeholder category. Job creation, occupational accidents, wage profile, education profile, and gender profile were selected as the main inventory indicators. A case study of three scenarios considering variations in agricultural and industrial technologies (including sugarcane straw recovery and second-generation ethanol production, for instance) was carried out for evaluating present first-generation (1G-basic, 1G-optimized) and future first- and second-generation ethanol production (1G2G).Results and discussionThe 1G-basic scenario leads to higher job creation levels over the supply chain mainly because of the influence of agricultural stage whose workers are mostly employed in sugarcane manual operations. On the other hand, 1G-optimized and 1G2G present supply chains are more reliant on the manufacturing, trade, and services sectors whose workers are associated with a lower level of occupational accidents, higher average wages, higher education level, and more participation of women in the work force.ConclusionsThe use of a novel hybrid approach integrating social life cycle assessment (SLCA) and input-output analysis (IOA) was useful to quantitatively distinguish the social effects over different present and future sugarcane biorefinery supply chains. As a consequence, this approach is very useful to support decision-making processes aiming to improve the sustainability of sugarcane biorefineries taking social aspects into account.

[1]  Catherine Macombe,et al.  Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[2]  Joaquim José Martins Guilhoto,et al.  Estimação da Matriz Insumo-Produto a Partir De Dados Preliminares das Contas Nacionais , 2005 .

[3]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Strengths or bias in social LCA? , 2011 .

[4]  André Faaij,et al.  Outlook for ethanol production costs in Brazil up to 2030, for different biomass crops and industrial technologies , 2015 .

[5]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Methodologies for social life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[6]  Luigia Petti,et al.  Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  Input–Output Analysis , 2011 .

[9]  J. Guilhoto,et al.  Estimação da Matriz Insumo-Produto Utilizando Dados Preliminares das Contas Nacionais: Aplicação e Análise de Indicadores Econômicos para o Brasil em 2005 (Using Data from the System of National Accounts to Estimate Input-Output Matrices: An Application Using Brazilian Data for 2005) , 2010 .

[10]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach , 2006 .

[11]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services , 2006 .

[12]  Jean-Pierre Revéret,et al.  Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  E. R. Morais,et al.  Technical and economic assessment of trash recovery in the sugarcane bioenergy production system , 2013 .

[14]  W. M. Griffin,et al.  Hybrid Input‐Output Life Cycle Assessment of First‐ and Second‐Generation Ethanol Production Technologies in Brazil , 2016 .

[15]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  An input–output based framework to evaluate human labour in life cycle assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[16]  Gregory A. Norris,et al.  Identifying Social Impacts in Product Supply Chains:Overview and Application of the Social Hotspot Database , 2012 .

[17]  G. Norris.  Social Impacts in Product Life Cycles - Towards Life Cycle Attribute Assessment , 2006 .

[18]  Andreas Jørgensen.  Social LCA—a way ahead? , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  R. M. Filho,et al.  Second generation ethanol in Brazil: can it compete with electricity production? , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[20]  Catherine Benoît Norris.  Data for social LCA , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[21]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of sugarcane first generation biorefineries in Brazil , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.