Lot sizing in stochastic flow shops: striking the balance between capacity and flow

The performance of a real-life production system (as measured by, for instance, the average flow time of parts or the average work-in-process level) is impacted by a range of managerial decisions, among which the product mix being produced in the shop, the layout of the shop, and the lot sizing policies (also called batching policies) used on the shop floor. Insights on the relationship between these (often deliberate) choices and the resulting performance have high managerial relevance. The impact of lot sizing policies on flow times is particularly interesting to analyze: by setting lot sizes in a deliberate way, managers can obtain flow time improvements without radical interventions in the system, and without large financial investments. Two types of lot sizing decisions can be distinguished: process lots and transfer lots. As discussed in this paper, a well-considered choice of both enables management to strike a balance between capacity considerations and flow considerations. We discuss some essential differences in the rationale underlying the use of process versus transfer lots, and shed light on the trade-offs inherent in both types of lot sizing decisions.

[1]  I. Van Nieuwenhuyse,et al.  From ERP to Advanced Resource Planning: Improving Operational Performance by Getting the Inputs Right , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[2]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Lot Sizes, Lead Times and In-Process Inventories , 1987 .

[3]  Dean H. Kropp,et al.  Optimal and Heuristic Models for Lot Splitting in a Flow Shop , 1990 .

[4]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  The impact of lot splitting on due date performance , 1994 .

[5]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  REPETITIVE LOTS: FLOW-TIME REDUCTIONS THROUGH SEQUENCING AND DYNAMIC BATCH SIZING , 1988 .

[6]  Bertrand M. T. Lin,et al.  Makespan minimization in the two‐machine flowshop batch scheduling problem , 2000 .

[7]  Nico Vandaele,et al.  Clips: a capacity and lead time integrated procedure for scheduling , 1998 .

[8]  Alper Sen,et al.  Optimal streaming of a single job in a two-stage flow shop , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Michal Tzur,et al.  Lot splitting to minimize average flow-time in a two-machine flow-shop , 2002 .

[10]  Kumar Rajaram,et al.  Buffer sizing in multi-product multi-reactor batch processes: Impact of allocation and campaign sizing policies , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  J. Doob Stochastic processes , 1953 .

[12]  Rajan Suri,et al.  Quick Response Manufacturing , 1998 .

[13]  Saifallah Benjaafar On production batches, transfer batches, and lead times , 1996 .

[14]  Michael Masin,et al.  Multi-objective lot splitting for a single product m-machine flowshop line , 2004 .

[15]  Dean H. Kropp,et al.  Lot Splitting in Stochastic Flow Shop and Job Shop Environments , 1996 .

[16]  Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.  Lot streaming in multistage production systems , 2000 .

[17]  Jiang Chen,et al.  Lot streaming with attached setups in three-machine flow shops , 1997 .

[18]  Yavuz A. Bozer,et al.  Determining transfer batch sizes in trip-based material handling systems , 1996 .