Deep learning for undersampled MRI reconstruction

This paper presents a deep learning method for faster magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by reducing k-space data with sub-Nyquist sampling strategies and provides a rationale for why the proposed approach works well. Uniform subsampling is used in the time-consuming phase-encoding direction to capture high-resolution image information, while permitting the image-folding problem dictated by the Poisson summation formula. To deal with the localization uncertainty due to image folding, a small number of low-frequency k-space data are added. Training the deep learning net involves input and output images that are pairs of the Fourier transforms of the subsampled and fully sampled k-space data. Our experiments show the remarkable performance of the proposed method; only 29[Formula: see text] of the k-space data can generate images of high quality as effectively as standard MRI reconstruction with the fully sampled data.

[1]  Leslie Ying,et al.  Accelerating magnetic resonance imaging via deep learning , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[2]  D. Larkman,et al.  Parallel magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Electro-Magnetic Tissue Properties MRI , 2014, Modelling and Simulation in Medical Imaging.

[4]  H. Nyquist,et al.  Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory , 1928, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[5]  E. Woo,et al.  Nonlinear Inverse Problems in Imaging , 2012 .

[6]  P. Lauterbur,et al.  Image Formation by Induced Local Interactions: Examples Employing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1973, Nature.

[7]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Deep Sparse Rectifier Neural Networks , 2011, AISTATS.

[9]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solution , 2006 .

[12]  W. Manning,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[14]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Thomas Pock,et al.  Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Deep artifact learning for compressed sensing and parallel MRI , 2017, ArXiv.

[18]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Multiscale Amplitude-Modulation Frequency-Modulation (AM–FM) Texture Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis in Brain MRI Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[19]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[20]  HyunWook Park,et al.  A parallel MR imaging method using multilayer perceptron , 2017, Medical physics.