Construction, Verification and Experimental Use of Two Epitope-Tagged Collections of Budding Yeast Strains

A major challenge in the post-genomic era is the development of experimental approaches to monitor the properties of proteins on a proteome-wide level. It would be particularly useful to systematically assay protein subcellular localization, post-translational modifications and protein–protein interactions, both at steady state and in response to environmental stimuli. Development of new reagents and methods will enhance our ability to do so efficiently and systematically. Here we describe the construction of two collections of budding yeast strains that facilitate proteome-wide measurements of protein properties. These collections consist of strains with an epitope tag integrated at the C-terminus of essentially every open reading frame (ORF), one with the tandem affinity purification (TAP) tag, and one with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) tag. We show that in both of these collections we have accurately tagged a high proportion of all ORFs (approximately 75% of the proteome) by confirming expression of the fusion proteins. Furthermore, we demonstrate the use of the TAP collection in performing high-throughput immunoprecipitation experiments. Building on these collections and the methods described in this paper, we hope that the yeast community will expand both the quantity and type of proteome level data available.

[1]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2003, Nature.

[2]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[3]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray , 1995, Science.

[4]  D. Lockhart,et al.  Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  M. Diehn Large-scale identification of secreted and membrane-associated gene products using DNA microarrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[6]  B. Birren,et al.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements , 2003, Nature.

[7]  S. Fields,et al.  A biochemical genomics approach for identifying genes by the activity of their products. , 1999, Science.

[8]  L. Fulton,et al.  Finding Functional Features in Saccharomyces Genomes by Phylogenetic Footprinting , 2003, Science.

[9]  André Goffeau,et al.  The yeast genome directory. , 1997, Nature.

[10]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. , 2000, Science.

[11]  Sophie Brachat,et al.  Reinvestigation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome annotation by comparison to the genome of a related fungus: Ashbya gossypii , 2003, Genome Biology.

[12]  S. Fields,et al.  Protein analysis on a proteomic scale , 2003, Nature.

[13]  J. Boeke,et al.  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR‐mediated gene disruption and other applications , 1998, Yeast.

[14]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[15]  P. Brown,et al.  Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. , 1997, Science.

[16]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[17]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[18]  C. Ball,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  E. O’Shea,et al.  An In Vitro System Recapitulates Chromatin Remodeling at the PHO5 Promoter , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Global Analysis of Protein Activities Using Proteome Chips , 2001, Science.