Crash analysis and evaluation of vehicular impacts on W-beam guardrails placed behind curbs using finite element simulations

Abstract Roadway design, including the use of traffic barriers, is a critical aspect in transportation safety and is used to reduce the severity and frequency of automotive accidents. All barriers used on U.S. highways are designed according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Roadside Design Guide and are tested to ensure they satisfy the safety criteria specified by Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). While curbs main functions are to separate the road from roadside, control vehicle rights-of-way, and channel water runoff; their use is discouraged by AASHTO from being installed on high-speed roadways due to the disruptive behavior caused when vehicles strike them. The destructive nature of vehicular crashes imposes significant challenges to barrier design using full-scale physical testing; numerical simulations thus become a viable option to support guardrail design improvements and performance evaluation. In this study, validated vehicle and W-beam guardrail models installed behind AASHTO Type B curbs were used to perform full-scale simulations of vehicle-curb-guardrail impacts. Seven single-faced W-beam guardrails, with placement heights of 27, 29, and 31 inches (0.69, 0.74, and 0.79 m), placed behind curbs at zero, six, and twelve foot offsets were impacted at 44 mph (70 km/h) and two impact angles (25° and 15°) by a 1996 Dodge Neon and a 2006 Ford F250. The guardrail's performance was evaluated by analyzing the maximum guardrail deflection and vehicular responses based on post-impact exit trajectory utilizing the MASH exit box criterion, rotational angles, and transverse and longitudinal displacements and velocities.

[1]  Thomas W Kennedy,et al.  SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS IN MEDIAN DESIGN , 1967 .

[2]  Duane F Dunlap.  BARRIER-CURB REDIRECTION EFFECTIVENESS , 1973 .

[3]  Cing-Dao Kan,et al.  Analyzing the Effects of Cable Barriers Behind Curbs Using Computer Simulation , 2009 .

[4]  J E Bryden,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A THRIE-BEAM STEEL-POST BRIDGE-RAIL SYSTEM. RESEARCH REPORT. FINAL REPORT , 1985 .

[5]  Tso-Liang Teng,et al.  Development and validation of a finite element model for road safety barrier impact tests , 2016, Simul..

[6]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  EVALUATION OF ROADSIDE SAFETY DEVICES USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[7]  Guilin Wen,et al.  Design optimization of a MASH TL-3 concrete barrier using RBF-based metamodels and nonlinear finite element simulations , 2016 .

[8]  M H Ray,et al.  The Use of Finite Element Analysis in Roadside Hardware Design , 1996 .

[9]  H McGee,et al.  Traffic Barriers on Curves, Curbs, and Slopes , 1993 .

[10]  Chuck A. Plaxico,et al.  Recommended Guidelines for Curb and Curb-Barrier Installations , 2005 .

[11]  David H. Klyde,et al.  Vehicle and Tire Modeling for DynamicAnalysis and Real-Time Simulation , 2000 .

[12]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Performance Limits for 6-in. (152-Mm) High Curbs Placed in Advance of the MGS Using MASH Vehicles: Part II, Full-Scale Crash Testing , 2009 .

[13]  David H. Klyde,et al.  Characteristics Influencing Ground Vehicle Lateral/Directional Dynamic Stability , 1991 .

[14]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  ROADSIDE SAFETY DESIGN FOR SMALL VEHICLES , 1989 .

[15]  Dhafer Marzougui,et al.  Development of a Finite Element Model for W-Beam Guardrails , 2007 .

[16]  Xu Han,et al.  Optimization design of corrugated beam guardrail based on RBF-MQ surrogate model and collision safety consideration , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[17]  R A Zimmer,et al.  RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR THE SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY FEATURES , 1993 .

[18]  Nadine Lafond.  Redirection effectiveness of roadside curbs , 1997 .

[19]  Francis P. D. Navin,et al.  SAFETY OF ROADSIDE CURBS , 1997 .

[20]  K. Furuta,et al.  METHODOLOGY AREAS Accident and incident investigation and modelling Aeronautics and aerospace An incident reporting support system for airline cabin crew , 2014 .

[21]  Hayes E Ross,et al.  EFFECT OF CURB GEOMETRY AND LOCATION ON VEHICLE BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[22]  J D Michie,et al.  RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR THE SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY APPURTENANCES , 1981 .

[23]  E R Post,et al.  DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF AN AUTOMOBILE TRAVERSING SELECTED CURBS AND MEDIANS , 1975 .

[24]  R N Field,et al.  FINAL REPORT OF FULL SCALE DYNAMIC TESTS OF BRIDGE CURBS AND RAILS: REPORT , 1957 .

[25]  Robert W Bielenberg,et al.  Detailed tire modeling for crash applications , 2007 .

[26]  M. B. C. Ulker,et al.  Traffic Barriers under Vehicular Impact: From Computer Simulation to Design Guidelines , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[27]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  GUARDRAIL AND GUARDRAIL TERMINALS INSTALLED OVER CURBS , 2000 .

[28]  Theodore J. Rosenthal,et al.  A Vehicle Dynamics Tire Model for Both Pavement and Off-Road Conditions , 1997 .

[29]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  GUARDRAIL AND GUARDRAIL TERMINALS INSTALLED OVER CURBS - PHASE II , 2001 .