Motivations underlying Latino Americans’ group-based social media engagement

Guided by the Social Identity Model of Collective Action, the current research utilizes a three-wave longitudinal study collected pre and post the 2020 U.S. Presidential election to examine the motivations underlying Latino Americans’ group-based social media engagement (N = 1,050). Results revealed that Time 1 group (Latino) identity increased Time 2 perceptions of social media as efficacious in improving group outcomes, which in turn increased Time 3 group-based social media engagement. Although T1 Latino identification was not significantly associated with T2 perceptions of personal or group-based injustice, the former (but not the latter) increased T3 group-based social media engagement. Our findings reflect that marginalized group members engage with social media in part because they believe it is efficacious in improving their disadvantageous group status. This may be an especially attractive strategy for those who face individual experiences of unjust treatment.

[1]  C. Leach,et al.  The power of the Ingroup for promoting collective action: How distinctive treatment from fellow minority members motivates collective action , 2022, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[2]  Brandon Rottinghaus,et al.  Conspiratorial thinking in the Latino community on the 2020 election , 2022, Research & Politics.

[3]  Weiting Tao,et al.  Motivations of online and offline activism against racism and xenophobia among Asian-American publics during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Telematics Informatics.

[4]  D. Lane,et al.  What is political expression on social media anyway?: A systematic review , 2021, Journal of Information Technology & Politics.

[5]  D. Lane,et al.  Testing Inequality and Identity Accounts of Racial Gaps in Political Expression on Social Media , 2021, Political Communication.

[6]  V. Keith,et al.  Discrimination and Black Social Media Use: Sites of Oppression and Expression , 2021, Sociology of Race and Ethnicity.

[7]  Simin Michelle Chen.  Women’s March Minnesota on Facebook: Effects of social connection on different types of collective action , 2020, New Media Soc..

[8]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  Testing the Social Identity Model of Collective Action Longitudinally and Across Structurally Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups , 2020, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[9]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Social Media Expression as a Collective Strategy: How Perceptions of Discrimination and Group Status Shape US Latinos’ Online Discussions of Immigration , 2020 .

[10]  Yannis Theocharis,et al.  Digitally Networked Participation and Lifestyle Politics as New Modes of Political Participation , 2019, Policy & Internet.

[11]  Linda Hon,et al.  How social ties contribute to collective actions on social media: A social capital approach , 2019, Public Relations Review.

[12]  Magdalena E. Wojcieszak,et al.  When and How Negative News Coverage Empowers Collective Action in Minorities , 2019, Communication Research.

[13]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Ethnic Minorities' Social Media Political Use: How Ingroup Identification, Selective Exposure, and Collective Efficacy Shape Social Media Political Expression , 2019, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Srividya Ramasubramanian,et al.  Social Identity Threats: How Media and Discrimination Affect Muslim Americans’ Identification as Americans and Trust in the U.S. Government , 2019, Journal of Communication.

[15]  M. Zomeren,et al.  Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high , 2018, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[16]  Lilliana Mason.  Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity , 2018 .

[17]  Brian E. Weeks,et al.  Perceptions of Social Media for Politics: Testing the Slacktivism Hypothesis , 2018 .

[18]  C. Leach,et al.  The Social Psychology of the Black Lives Matter Meme and Movement , 2017 .

[19]  James E. Katz,et al.  We Face, I Tweet: How Different Social Media Influence Political Participation through Collective and Internal Efficacy , 2017, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Michael Chan,et al.  Media Use and the Social Identity Model of Collective Action: Examining the Roles of Online Alternative News and Social Media News , 2017 .

[21]  Amy L. Gonzales,et al.  Disadvantaged Minorities’ Use of the Internet to Expand Their Social Networks , 2017, Commun. Res..

[22]  J. Jost,et al.  Missing in (Collective) Action , 2017 .

[23]  Hernando Rojas,et al.  Political Expression on Social Media: The Role of Communication Competence and Expected Outcomes , 2017 .

[24]  Deen Freelon,et al.  Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the Online Struggle for Offline Justice , 2016 .

[25]  Martijn van Zomeren,et al.  The social affirmation use of social media as a motivator of collective action , 2016 .

[26]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Youth collective activism through social media: The role of collective efficacy , 2015, New Media Soc..

[27]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Source effects in the micro-mobilization of collective action via social media , 2015 .

[28]  Travis L. Dixon,et al.  The Changing Misrepresentation of Race and Crime on Network and Cable News , 2015 .

[29]  Jesse Fox,et al.  Queer Identity Management and Political Self‐Expression on Social Networking Sites: A Co‐Cultural Approach to the Spiral of Silence , 2015 .

[30]  S. Murphy,et al.  Telling Stories, Saving Lives: Creating Narrative Health Messages , 2015, Health communication.

[31]  Paul J. C. Adachi,et al.  Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science , 2015 .

[32]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment , 2014 .

[33]  Michael Scharkow,et al.  The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2013, Psychological science.

[34]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[35]  Russell Spears,et al.  Protesters as “Passionate Economists” , 2012, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[36]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs , 2012 .

[37]  Stefaan Walgrave,et al.  Multiple Engagements and Network Bridging in Contentious Politics : Digital Media Use of Protest Participants , 2011 .

[38]  Stephen C. Wright.  The Next Generation of Collective Action Research , 2009 .

[39]  S. Moskalenko,et al.  Measuring Political Mobilization: The Distinction Between Activism and Radicalism , 2009 .

[40]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  C. Leach,et al.  Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage? , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[42]  R. Lance Holbert,et al.  Primacy Effects of The Daily Show and National TV News Viewing: Young Viewers, Political Gratifications, and Internal Political Self-Efficacy , 2007 .

[43]  Olivier Klein,et al.  Social Identity Performance: Extending the Strategic Side of SIDE , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[44]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  Bernd Simon,et al.  Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model , 2004 .

[46]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age , 2002 .

[47]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Perceiving Discrimination Against One’s Gender Group has Different Implications for Well-Being in Women and Men , 2002 .

[48]  B. Simon,et al.  Politicized collective identity. A social psychological analysis. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[49]  H. Bang,et al.  The Everyday Maker: A New Challenge to Democratic Governance , 1999 .

[50]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[51]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Why minority group members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: the role of self-esteem and perceived control. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. , 1995 .

[53]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  The Personal/Group Discrimination Discrepancy , 1990 .

[54]  Sarah J. Jackson,et al.  #HashtagActivism , 2020 .

[55]  D. E. Glasford,et al.  The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups , 2012 .

[56]  J. Drury,et al.  Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes , 2005 .

[57]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .