Automatic Exposure Control in Digital Mammography: Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Versus Average Glandular Dose

Performance of Automatic Exposure control in several digital mammography systems (both CR and DR) were evaluated. The test procedure applied was that proposed by the European Guidelines, which requires measurement of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) produced by 0.2 mm Al superimposed on variable polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) thicknesses. PMMA layers were exposed by full automatic techniques and average glandular dose (AGD) determined. Results demonstrated that AGD values keep below the acceptable limits for all CR and DR systems at almost all equivalent breast thicknesses. CNRabsolute values per each thickness can significantly vary, depending on characteristics of each type of equipment. The application of limits suggested by the European Guidelines for CNRvariation with reference to 50 mm PMMA causes systematic failure for equivalent breast thickness above 50 mm; this may be due to the contradiction between the principles followed by the manufacturers to designed the AEC (signal constancy) and those proposed by the European protocol (CNRconstancy).

[1]  R Klausz,et al.  Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system , 2006, European Radiology.

[3]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  Walter Huda,et al.  Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  D R Dance,et al.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  C Kimme-Smith New digital mammography systems may require different X-ray spectra and, therefore, more general normalized glandular dose values. , 1999, Radiology.

[9]  H Bosmans,et al.  Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  K. Young,et al.  European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening 2 a Screen-film mammography 2 b Digital mammography , 1999 .

[11]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  Optimal radiographic techniques for digital mammograms obtained with an amorphous selenium detector , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.