Recommendations for the management of subsistence fisheries in South Africa

This paper summarizes recommendations for the management of previously marginalized and neglected subsistence fisheries in South Africa. The recommendations stem from the activities and analyses of a task group appointed by Government and mandated to provide advice about management of the new fishing sector. The following focus areas were identified for attention: planning for implementation; definitions of subsistence fishers and other sectors; assessment and categorization of resources; determination of types of fishing activities; zonation; management systems; training; communication mechanisms; application and allocation procedures; compliance processes; research and monitoring; development of institutional capacity. Subsistence fishers were defined as poor people who personally harvest marine resources as a source of food or to sell them to meet basic needs of food security; they operate on or near to the shore or in estuaries, live in close proximity to the resource, consume or sell the resources locally, use low-technology gear (often as part of a long-standing community-based or cultural practice), and the resources they harvest generate only sufficient returns to meet basic needs of food security. A second group of informal fishers was identified that fishes for profit but cannot be equated to large industrial fisheries, and a new sector was proposed to accommodate these artisanal "small-scale commercial" fishers. Resources were classified for use by these different sectors based on accessibility, fishing methods, cash value and sustainability. In all, 12 different categories of subsistence and small-scale commercial fisheries were identified, and a preliminary list of resource species suitable for different fishing sectors is presented. A multi-tiered institutional management structure is recommended, with the national agency (MCM) controlling issues of national concern, and supporting and coordinating the activities of provincial and local structures. The management agents required for effective implementation were identified and include a dedicated national Subsistence Fisheries Management Unit, provincial management agencies that have the capacity to be delegated authority, Regional Fieldworkers, an independent Advisory Group for Subsistence Fisheries Management, local co-management structures, and community monitors responsible for observing and recording fishing activities and catches. Co-management, involving both authorities and users in joint management, is advocated in preference to previous top-down approaches, because of its potential to improve communication and compliance.

[1]  Heather M. Leslie,et al.  APPLICATION OF ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA IN SELECTING MARINE RESERVES AND DEVELOPING RESERVE NETWORKS , 2003 .

[2]  J. Castilla,et al.  ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING CANDIDATE SITES FOR MARINE RESERVES , 2003 .

[3]  G. M. Branch,et al.  Assessment of resource availability and suitability for subsistence fishers in South Africa, with a review of resource management procedures , 2002 .

[4]  J. M. Harris,et al.  The process of developing a management system for subsistence fisheries in South Africa: recognizing and formalizing a marginalized fishing sector in South Africa , 2002 .

[5]  M. Hauck,et al.  Defining fishers in the South African context: subsistence, artisanal and small-scale commercial sectors , 2002 .

[6]  G. M. Branch,et al.  Case studies on the socio-economic characteristics and lifestyles of subsistence and informal fishers in South Africa , 2002 .

[7]  M. Hauck,et al.  Identification of subsistence fishers, fishing areas, resource use and activities along the South African coast , 2002 .

[8]  M. Sowman,et al.  Coastal and fisheries co-management in South Africa: an overview and analysis , 2001 .

[9]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Long-term trends in catch and effort of commercial linefish off South Africa's Cape Province: snapshots of the 20th century , 2000 .

[10]  M. Hauck,et al.  A case study of abalone poaching in South Africa and its impact on fisheries management , 1999 .

[11]  J. Castilla,et al.  Coastal marine communities: trends and perspectives from human-exclusion experiments. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  C. Attwood,et al.  Collapse of linefish stocks between Cape Hangklip and Walker Bay, South Africa , 1999 .

[13]  A. Penney,et al.  Long-term trends in catch and effort in the Kwazulu-Natal nearshore linefisheries , 1999 .

[14]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Current directions in fisheries management policy: a perspective on co-management and its application to South African fisheries , 1998 .

[15]  W. Robertson,et al.  Subsistence shellfish harvesting in the Maputaland Marine Reserve in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Rocky shore organisms , 1997 .

[16]  C. Erasmus,et al.  The status of the South African beach-seine and gill-net fisheries , 1997 .

[17]  C. Attwood,et al.  International experience of marine protected areas and their relevance to South Africa , 1997 .

[18]  G. M. Branch,et al.  Criteria, objectives and methodology for evaluating marine protected areas in South Africa , 1997 .

[19]  Bonnie J. McCay,et al.  User participation in fisheries management: lessons drawn from international experiences☆ , 1995 .

[20]  J. G. Field,et al.  Community-level attributes of exploited and non-exploited rocky infratidal macrofaunal assemblages in Transkei , 1995 .

[21]  P. Hockey,et al.  Conserving marine biodiversity on the African coast: Implications of a terrestrial perspective , 1994 .

[22]  A. Dye.  Experimental studies of succession and stability in rocky intertidal communities subject to artisanal shellfish gathering , 1992 .

[23]  R. Kenchington,et al.  Guidelines for Establishing Marine Protected Areas , 1991 .

[24]  Anthony Charles,et al.  Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development , 1990 .

[25]  P. Hockey,et al.  Patterns and correlates of shellfish exploitation by coastal people in Transkei: an enigma of protein production , 1988 .

[26]  P. Hockey,et al.  Man as an Intertidal Predator in Transkei: Disturbance, Community Convergence and Management of a Natural Food Resource , 1986 .

[27]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Fishermen and ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ , 1985, Environmental Conservation.

[28]  R. Kyle,et al.  Subsistence and recreational mussel (Perna perno) collecting in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: fishing mortality and precautionary management , 1998 .

[29]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Reinventing Fisheries Management , 1998, Fish & Fisheries Series.

[30]  R. J. Anderson,et al.  COMMUNITY CO-MANAGEMENT OF INTERTIDAL MUSSEL RESOURCES : PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS , 1997 .

[31]  A. Dye,et al.  Recovery and recruitment of the brown mussel, Perna perna (L.), in Transkei: implications for management , 1997 .

[32]  M. Haward,et al.  Marine Living Resources , 1996 .

[33]  M. Young.  The design of fishing-right systems—the new South Wales experience , 1995 .

[34]  F. Odendaal,et al.  Socio-Economic Options for the Management of the Exploitation of Intertidal and Subtidal Resources , 1994 .

[35]  L. Beckley,et al.  Transkei coastal fisheries resources , 1994 .

[36]  F. Berkes.  Native Subsistence Fisheries: A Synthesis of Harvest Studies in Canada , 1990 .

[37]  C. Dahl.  Traditional marine tenure: A basis for artisanal fisheries management , 1988 .

[38]  F. Berkes.  Subsistence Fishing in Canada: A Note on Terminology , 1988 .