Embodiment, Engagement and The Strength Virtual Communities: Avatars of Second Life in Decay

96 Normal 0 21 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE Second Life is the one of strongest currently known type of cultural, collectively negotiated constructions of virtual reality, and despite its old age (12 years), it is still a platform for interactions for a small but consolidated group of residents. In this paper I will make an attempt to discuss how certain Second Life communities remain strong despite the mediums overall decay. I will mainly focus at the relationships of the members of these successful communities with their avatars putting forward two categories: embodiment and engagement. To support my argument I will focus on case-studies of three significant and dynamical and fantasy communities in Second Life: Goreans, Furries and Tinies. As I will try to show, there are several relevant conclusions emerging from the etnographic research conducted for the purpose of this article. First of all, avatars created within such communities also share particular common traits: they possess features that allow for stronger narrative and/or embodied identification. Secondly, „strong” communities usually put a lot of emphasis on managing communication and interaction among their members.

[1]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Przerysować mapę i przestawić czas: fenomenologia i nauki kognitywne , 2010 .

[2]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Constructions and reconstructions of self in virtual reality: Playing in the MUDs , 1994 .

[3]  F. Varela Patterns of Life: Intertwining Identity and Cognition , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  C. Badcock,et al.  Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena , 1995 .

[5]  J. Baudrillard,et al.  Why Hasn't Everything Already Disappeared? , 2009 .

[6]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[7]  P. Husbands,et al.  The Mechanical Mind in History , 2008 .

[8]  S. Gallagher How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[9]  S. Gallagher Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Presenter Biographies What ’ s the Use of Race ? * * , 2008 .

[11]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[12]  J. Mezirow,et al.  Education for Perspective Transformation. Women's Re-entry Programs in Community Colleges. , 1978 .

[13]  R. Mizen The embodied mind. , 2009, The Journal of analytical psychology.

[14]  Felix Stalder,et al.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[15]  L. Taylor,et al.  Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory , 1989 .

[16]  Mark L. Johnson The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason , 1989 .

[17]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  C. Dubouloz,et al.  The Process of Change: Listening to Transformation in Meaning Perspectives of Adults in Arthritis Health Education Groups , 2005, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[19]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[20]  Kevin D. Kelly What Technology Wants , 2010 .

[21]  David S. Jones,et al.  What's the use of race? : modern governance and the biology of difference , 2010 .

[22]  M. Duffy,et al.  The organization man. , 1994, Time.

[23]  Michael Henry Heim,et al.  The metaphysics of virtual reality , 1993 .

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.

[25]  Hao Yan,et al.  More than just a pretty face: affordances of embodiment , 2000, IUI '00.

[26]  N. Presmeg The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason , 1992 .

[27]  F. Biocca,et al.  Communication in the age of virtual reality , 1995 .

[28]  M. Rohde,et al.  Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play , 2010 .

[29]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. , 2012 .