Reproducibility of measurements of ventricular activation time using the signal-averaged Frank vectorcardiogram.

Interobserver and day-to-day variability in detecting delayed potentials and in measuring duration of ventricular depolarization using the signal-averaged Frank vectorcardiogram were investigated in 20 patients, 12 with and 8 without ventricular tachycardia (VT). No patients were taking antiarrhythmic medications, digoxin or beta blockers at the time of study. The presence of delayed potentials and duration of ventricular activation were measured 2 times a mean of 5 days apart by 2 observers. Analysis of variance showed no significant interobserver variability in ventricular activation time. Day-to-day differences in ventricular activation times were small in patients without VT, none of whom had delayed potentials at either study. Delayed potentials were present in all 12 patients with VT at the first recording and in 11 at the repeat recording. However, significant (p less than 0.01) day-to-day variability was found in ventricular activation times, and 3 of the 12 patients had marked (more than 20 ms) day-to-day changes. It is concluded that in the absence of medical or surgical intervention, delayed potentials detected on 1 day have a high chance of being present at a repeat recording. However, the exact timing of these delayed potentials shows marked day-to-day variation in some patients. Interobserver variability is not significant with this method of detecting delayed potentials.

[1]  J A Gomes,et al.  Appraisal of a Low Noise Electrocardiogram. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  E. Frank An Accurate, Clinically Practical System For Spatial Vectorcardiography , 1956, Circulation.

[3]  V Hombach,et al.  The applicability of the signal averaging technique in clinical cardiology , 1982, Clinical cardiology.

[4]  M. Simson Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[5]  S Abboud,et al.  Non-invasive recording of late ventricular activity using an advanced method in patients with a damaged mass of ventricular tissue. , 1983, Journal of electrocardiology.

[6]  M Borggrefe,et al.  Prognostic significance of late ventricular potentials after acute myocardial infarction. , 1983, European heart journal.

[7]  J. A. Abildskov,et al.  Limited Lead Selection for Estimation of Body Surface Potential Maps in Electrocardiography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  P. Denes,et al.  Quantitative Analsis of the High‐frequency Components of the Terminal Portion of the Body Surface QRS in Normal Subjects and in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 1983, Circulation.

[9]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Effect of Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Ventricular Late Potentials at Sinus Rhythm and at Constant Atrial Rate , 1983 .

[10]  Smith Re,et al.  The effect of electrode position on a modified Frank electrovectorcardiographic lead system. , 1971 .

[11]  R Lazzara,et al.  Recording from the body surface of arrhythmogenic ventricular activity during the S-T segment. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  D. Mortara,et al.  Body Surface Detection of Delayed Depolarizations in Patients with Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia and Left Ventricular Aneurysm , 1981, Circulation.

[13]  L Seipel,et al.  Non-invasive detection of late potentials in man--a new marker for ventricular tachycardia. , 1981, European heart journal.

[14]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Effects of antiarrhythmic surgery on late ventricular potentials recorded by precordial signal averaging in patients with ventricular tachycardia. , 1982, American heart journal.