Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases

Two experiments examined processing of singular pronouns when the antecedent (e.g., Mary) was a noun phrase (NP) in a conjoined phrase (e.g., Mary and John). Whole-sentence reading times showed an increase in processing time associated with splitting the conjoined phrase to access a single NP antecedent. The increase in processing occurred both when the antecedent was in the subject position and when it was in a nonsubject position. The source of the disruption was further investigated using eyetracking methods. Summing over regions of the text, the magnitude of the processing cost incurred by having to split a conjoined NP was closely comparable when there was and when there was not a gender-appropriate distracting potential antecedent. When there was no such potential antecedent, the increase in processing time occurred immediately in the pronoun region when eye movements were measured. In contrast, when there was a second discourse entity that matched the gender and number of the pronoun (but was not a plausible antecedent for the pronoun), eyetracking measures suggested that the processing difficulty was delayed until additional information was read that forced the antecedent to be one of the conjoined NPs. The results are interpreted in terms of Sanford and Garrod’s (1981) scenario-based model of text comprehension.

[1]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Proper Names as Controllers of Discourse Focus , 1988 .

[2]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes , 1989 .

[3]  Wietske Vonk,et al.  The Immediacy of Inferences in the Understanding of Pronouns , 1985 .

[4]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: Psycholinguistic studies. , 1994 .

[5]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .

[6]  S. Garrod,et al.  Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. , 1994 .

[7]  A. Sanford.  Aspects of Pronoun Interpretation: Evaluation of Search Formulations of Inference , 1985 .

[8]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference , 1980 .

[9]  D. S. Lindsay,et al.  Remembering Mistaken for Knowing: Ease of Retrieval as a Basis for Confidence in Answers to General Knowledge Questions , 1993 .

[10]  S. Garrod,et al.  What, when, and how?: Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution , 1989 .

[11]  F. Corblin,et al.  Discourse structure and anaphora: Barbara Fox, Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 173 pp. $34.50. , 1989 .

[12]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Anaphoric inference during reading. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  K. Rayner,et al.  Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .

[15]  S. Garrod,et al.  THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF DISCOURSE IN A FOCUSSED MEMORY SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF ANAPHORIC NOUN PHRASES , 1982 .

[16]  W. Vonk,et al.  Eye Movements During Comprehension of Pronouns , 1984 .

[17]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[18]  S. Garrod,et al.  Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence , 1981 .

[19]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Description Types and Method of Conjoining as Factors Influencing Plural Anaphora: a Continuation Study of Focus , 1990, J. Semant..

[20]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .

[21]  M. Beeman,et al.  Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[22]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Comprehension of Anaphoric Pronouns. , 1977 .

[23]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  Semantic priming at pictures and words: a levels of processing approach , 1983 .

[24]  K. Ehrlich,et al.  Comprehension of Pronouns , 1980 .

[25]  Pronouns and the representation of discourse. , 1989 .

[26]  Christopher Habel,et al.  Remarks on Plural Anaphora , 1989, EACL.

[27]  H. H. Clark,et al.  In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .