Application of the Level-$2$ Quantum Lasserre Hierarchy in Quantum Approximation Algorithms

The Lasserre Hierarchy, [18, 19], is a set of semidefinite programs which yield increasingly tight bounds on optimal solutions to many NP-hard optimization problems. The hierarchy is parameterized by levels, with a higher level corresponding to a more accurate relaxation. High level programs have proven to be invaluable components of approximation algorithms for many NP-hard optimization problems [3, 7, 26]. There is a natural analogous quantum hierarchy [5, 8, 24], which is also parameterized by level and provides a relaxation of many (QMA-hard) quantum problems of interest [5,6,9]. In contrast to the classical case, however, there is only one approximation algorithm which makes use of higher levels of the hierarchy [5]. Here we provide the first ever use of the level-2 hierarchy in an approximation algorithm for a particular QMA-complete problem, so-called Quantum Max Cut [2,9]. We obtain modest improvements on state-of-the-art approximation factors for this problem, as well as demonstrate that the level-2 hierarchy satisfies many physically-motivated constraints that the level-1 does not satisfy. Indeed, this observation is at the heart of our analysis and indicates that higher levels of the quantum Lasserre Hierarchy may be very useful tools in the design of approximation algorithms for QMA-complete problems. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Approximation algorithms analysis; Theory of computation → Semidefinite programming; Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory

[1]  David Gosset,et al.  Beyond Product State Approximations for a Quantum Analogue of Max Cut , 2020, TQC.

[2]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions, with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1966 .

[3]  Jean B. Lasserre,et al.  Global Optimization with Polynomials and the Problem of Moments , 2000, SIAM J. Optim..

[4]  Mikhail N. Vyalyi,et al.  Classical and Quantum Computation , 2002, Graduate studies in mathematics.

[5]  Robert Koenig,et al.  Approximation algorithms for quantum many-body problems , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Physics.

[6]  Alexander Schrijver,et al.  Combinatorial optimization. Polyhedra and efficiency. , 2003 .

[7]  Adam D. Bookatz QMA-complete problems , 2012, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[8]  Ojas Parekh,et al.  An Approximation Algorithm for the MAX-2-Local Hamiltonian Problem , 2020, APPROX-RANDOM.

[9]  Ojas Parekh,et al.  Almost Optimal Classical Approximation Algorithms for a Quantum Generalization of Max-Cut , 2019, APPROX-RANDOM.

[10]  Anton van den Hengel,et al.  Semidefinite Programming , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[11]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Approximation Algorithms , 2001, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  Dima Grigoriev,et al.  Complexity of Positivstellensatz proofs for the knapsack , 2002, computational complexity.

[13]  Subhash Khot,et al.  On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games , 2002, Proceedings 17th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity.

[14]  Anurag Anshu,et al.  Improved approximation algorithms for bounded-degree local Hamiltonians , 2021, Physical review letters.

[15]  Jean B. Lasserre,et al.  An Explicit Exact SDP Relaxation for Nonlinear 0-1 Programs , 2001, IPCO.

[16]  Yuan Zhou,et al.  Hypercontractivity, sum-of-squares proofs, and their applications , 2012, STOC '12.

[17]  Ojas Parekh,et al.  Beating Random Assignment for Approximating Quantum 2-Local Hamiltonian Problems , 2020, ESA.

[18]  Fuzhen Zhang The Schur complement and its applications , 2005 .

[19]  E. Lieb,et al.  Ordering Energy Levels of Interacting Spin Systems , 1962 .

[20]  Guy Kindler,et al.  Optimal inapproximability results for MAX-CUT and other 2-variable CSPs? , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[21]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  The Quantum Moment Problem and Bounds on Entangled Multi-prover Games , 2008, 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[22]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[23]  Aram Wettroth Harrow,et al.  Product-state approximations to quantum ground states , 2013, STOC '13.

[24]  Gyanit Singh,et al.  Improved Approximation Guarantees through Higher Levels of SDP Hierarchies , 2008, APPROX-RANDOM.

[25]  Yi-Kai Liu Consistency of Local Density Matrices Is QMA-Complete , 2006, APPROX-RANDOM.

[26]  David P. Williamson,et al.  Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming , 1995, JACM.

[27]  Horodecki Information-theoretic aspects of inseparability of mixed states. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[28]  Prasad Raghavendra,et al.  Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies , 2011, SODA.

[29]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Convergent Relaxations of Polynomial Optimization Problems with Noncommuting Variables , 2009, SIAM J. Optim..

[30]  P. Parrilo Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization , 2000 .

[31]  David P. Williamson,et al.  The Design of Approximation Algorithms , 2011 .