Evaluation of bioremediation effectiveness on crude oil-contaminated sand.

A treatability study was conducted using sea sand spiked with 3% or 6% (w/w) of Arabian light crude oil to determine the most effective bioremediation strategies for different levels of contamination. The sea sand used in the study was composed of gravel (0.1%), sand (89.0%), and silt and clay (10.9%). The water content of the sea sand was adjusted to 12.6% (w/w) for the study. Different combinations of the following treatments were applied to the sand in biometer flasks: the concentration of oil (3% or 6%), the concentration of a mixture of three oil-degrading microorganisms (Corynebacterium sp. IC-10, Sphingomonas sp. KH3-2 and Yarrowia sp. 180, 1x10(6) or 1x10(8) cells g-1 sand), the concentration of the surfactant Tween 80 (1 or 10 times the critical micelle concentration), and the addition of SRIF in a C:N:P ratio of 100:10:3. Three biometer flasks per combination of experimental conditions were incubated, and the performance of each treatment was examined by monitoring CO2 evolution, microbial activity, and oil degradation rate. The results suggest that the addition of inorganic nutrients accelerated the rate of CO2 evolution by a factor of 10. The application of oil-degrading microorganisms in a concentration greater than that of the indigenous population clearly increased biodegradation efficiency. The application of surfactant slightly enhanced the oil degradation rate in the contaminated sand treated with the higher concentration of oil-degrading microorganisms. The initial CO2 evolution rate was shown to efficiently evaluate the treatability test by providing significant data within a short period, which is critical for the rapid determination of the appropriate bioremediation approach. The measurements of microbial activity and crude oil degradation also confirmed the validity of the CO2 evolution rate as an appropriate criterion.

[1]  E. Harner,et al.  Effectiveness of bioremediation for the Exxon Valdez oil spill , 1994, Nature.

[2]  Y. Oh,et al.  Effectiveness of Bioremediation on Oil-Contaminated Sand in Intertidal Zone , 2003 .

[3]  R. Bartha,et al.  Features of a Flask and Method for Measuring the Persistence and Biological Effects of Pesticides in Soil , 1965 .

[4]  Albert D. Venosa,et al.  Bioremediation of an Experimental Oil Spill on the Shoreline of Delaware Bay , 1996 .

[5]  Y. Oh,et al.  Effects of nutrients on crude oil biodegradation in the upper intertidal zone. , 2001, Marine pollution bulletin.

[6]  Y. Oh,et al.  The Possible Involvement of the Cell Surface in Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Utilization by an Oil-Degrading Yeast, Yarrowia lipolytica 180 , 2000 .

[7]  K. Porter,et al.  The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora1 , 1980 .

[8]  Kenneth Lee,et al.  Bioremediation of Oil on Shoreline Environments: Development of Techniques and Guidelines , 1999 .

[9]  C. E. Zobell,et al.  ACTION OF MICROÖRGANISMS ON HYDROCARBONS , 1946, Bacteriological reviews.

[10]  M. Huesemann,et al.  Compositional changes during landfarming of weathered michigan crude oil‐contaminated soii , 1993 .

[11]  J. Vosjan Respiratory electron transport system activities in marine environments , 1982, Hydrobiological Bulletin.

[12]  R. Bartha,et al.  Testing of some assumptions about biodegradability in soil as measured by carbon dioxide evolution , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  Y. Oh,et al.  Use of microorganism-immobilized polyurethane foams to absorb and degrade oil on water surface , 2000, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[14]  Sang-Jin Kim,et al.  Specific detection of an oil-degrading bacterium, Corynebacterium sp. IC10, in sand microcosms by PCR using species-specific primers based on 16S rRNA gene sequences , 2001, Biotechnology Letters.

[15]  J. Trevors,et al.  Measurement of Electron Transport System (ETS) activity in soil , 1982, Microbial Ecology.

[16]  Z. Khan,et al.  Identification of biomarker compounds in selected Kuwait crude oils , 1999 .

[17]  A. Singh,et al.  Biodegradation and Bioremediation , 2020, Soil Biology.

[18]  H. Halvorson,et al.  New Developments in Marine Biotechnology , 2010, Springer US.

[19]  E. Sherr,et al.  Estimating abundunce and single-cell characteristics of respiring bacteria via the redox dye CTC , 1999 .

[20]  P. Pinvidic,et al.  Weathering rates of oil components in a bioremediation experiment in estuarine sediments , 1998 .

[21]  R. Govind,et al.  Efficacy of commercial products in enhancing oil biodegradation in closed laboratory reactors , 2005, Journal of Industrial Microbiology.

[22]  P. Williams,et al.  Rates of respiratory oxygen-consumption and electron-transport in surface seawater from the northwest atlantic , 1981 .

[23]  A. Vézina,et al.  Respiratory activity and C02 production rates of microorganisms in the lower St Lawrence Estuary , 1995 .

[24]  Sung-Chan Choi,et al.  Evaluation of Fertilizer Additions to Stimulate Oil Biodegradation in Sand Seashore Mesocosms , 2002 .

[25]  M. Denis,et al.  Deep-ocean metabolic CO2 production: calculations from ETS activity , 1988 .

[26]  K. Venkateswaran,et al.  Distribution and biodegradation potential of oil-degrading bacteria in North Eastern Japanese coastal waters , 1991 .