Prelaunch Radiometric Calibration of the TanSat Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Grating Spectrometer

TanSat is an important satellite in the Chinese Earth Observation Program which is designed to measure global atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations from space. The first Chinese superhigh-resolution grating spectrometer for measuring atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> is aboard TanSat. This spectrometer is a suite of three grating spectrometers that make coincident measurements of reflected sunlight in the near-infrared CO<sub>2</sub> band near 1.61 and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.06~\mu \text{m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and in the molecular oxygen A-band (O<sub>2</sub>A) at <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.76~\mu \text{m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. Their spectral resolving power (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda /\Delta \lambda$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) is ~19 000, ~12 800, and ~12 250 in the O<sub>2</sub>A, weak absorption band of molecular carbon dioxide band, and strong absorption of carbon dioxide band, respectively. This paper describes the laboratory radiometric calibration of the spectrometer suite, which consists of measurements of the dark current response, gain coefficients, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The SNRs of each channel meet the mission requirements for the O<sub>2</sub>A and weak CO<sub>2</sub> band but slightly miss the requirements in a few channels in the strong CO<sub>2</sub> band. The gain coefficients of the three bands have a negligible random error component and achieve very good stability. Most of the R-squared of gain coefficients model consist of five numbers of nine (e.g., 0.99999) after the decimal point, suggesting that the instrument has significant response linearity. The radiometric calibration results meet the requirements of an absolute calibration uncertainty of less than 5%.

[1]  David M. Rider,et al.  OCO/GOSAT Preflight Cross-Calibration Experiment , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2: first 18 months of science data products , 2016 .

[3]  V. Malathy Devi,et al.  Spectroscopic challenges for high accuracy retrievals of atmospheric CO2 and the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) experiment , 2005 .

[4]  Robert E. Haring,et al.  The Orbiting Carbon Observatory instrument: performance of the OCO instrument and plans for the OCO-2 instrument , 2010, Remote Sensing.

[5]  Randy Pollock,et al.  Preflight Radiometric Calibration of Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  David Crisp,et al.  Preflight Radiometric Calibration of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Frédéric Chevallier,et al.  Impact of correlated observation errors on inverted CO2 surface fluxes from OCO measurements , 2007 .

[8]  David Crisp,et al.  Precision requirements for space-based XCO2 data , 2007 .

[9]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Orbiting Carbon Observatory: Inverse method and prospective error analysis , 2008 .

[10]  David Crisp,et al.  The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission , 2004 .

[11]  David Crisp,et al.  The on-orbit performance of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) instrument and its radiometrically calibrated products , 2016 .

[12]  David Crisp,et al.  The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO-2): spectrometer performance evaluation using pre-launch direct sun measurements , 2014 .

[13]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .