Identification of Semaphorin 5A Interacting Protein by Applying Apriori Knowledge and Peptide Complementarity Related to Protein Evolution and Structure

In the post-genomic era, various computational methods that predict protein-protein interactions at the genome level are available; however, each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, resulting in false predictions. Here we developed a unique integrated approach to identify interacting partner(s) of Semaphorin 5A (SEMA5A), beginning with seven proteins sharing similar ligand interacting residues as putative binding partners. The methods include Dwyer and Root-Bernstein/Dillon theories of protein evolution, hydropathic complementarity of protein structure, pattern of protein functions among molecules, information on domain-domain interactions, co-expression of genes and protein evolution. Among the set of seven proteins selected as putative SEMA5A interacting partners, we found the functions of Plexin B3 and Neuropilin-2 to be associated with SEMA5A. We modeled the semaphorin domain structure of Plexin B3 and found that it shares similarity with SEMA5A. Moreover, a virtual expression database search and RT-PCR analysis showed co-expression of SEMA5A and Plexin B3 and these proteins were found to have co-evolved. In addition, we confirmed the interaction of SEMA5A with Plexin B3 in co-immunoprecipitation studies. Overall, these studies demonstrate that an integrated method of prediction can be used at the genome level for discovering many unknown protein binding partners with known ligand binding domains.

[1]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[2]  Giorgio F. Gilestro,et al.  Plexin‐B3 is a functional receptor for semaphorin 5A , 2004, EMBO reports.

[3]  G. Church,et al.  Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Ron D. Appel,et al.  ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  T. Yagi,et al.  Interactions between Plexin-A2, Plexin-A4, and Semaphorin 6A Control Lamina-Restricted Projection of Hippocampal Mossy Fibers , 2007, Neuron.

[6]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part II. Computational Methods to Predict Protein and Domain Interaction Partners , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  N. Blackstone,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell.Fourth Edition.ByBruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, and, Peter Walter.New York: Garland Science.$102.00. xxxiv + 1463 p; ill.; glossary (G:1–G:36); index (I:1–I:49); tables (T:1). ISBN: 0–8153–3218–1. [CD‐ROM included.] 2002. , 2003 .

[9]  P. Chakrabarti,et al.  Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  G. Rosenberger,et al.  Plexin B3 promotes neurite outgrowth, interacts homophilically, and interacts with Rin , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[11]  W. Delano Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  A. Moorman,et al.  Inactivation of the Sema5a Gene Results in Embryonic Lethality and Defective Remodeling of the Cranial Vascular System , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[13]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.

[14]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  LuHui,et al.  Correlation between gene expression profiles and protein--protein interactions within and across genomes , 2005 .

[16]  A Bairoch,et al.  SWISS-PROT: connecting biomolecular knowledge via a protein database. , 2001, Current issues in molecular biology.

[17]  Hirohisa Kishino,et al.  Phylogenetic methodology for detecting protein interactions. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  J. Blalock,et al.  Genetic origins of protein shape and interaction rules , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Computational verification of protein-protein interactions by orthologous co-expression , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  CPH MODELS 2.0: X3M A COMPUTER PROGRAM TO EXTRACT 3D MODELS , 2002 .

[21]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. , 1999, Science.

[22]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  Organ targeting In vivo using phage display peptide libraries , 1996, Nature.

[23]  A. Miller,et al.  A search within the IL-1 type I receptor reveals a peptide with hydropathic complementarity to the IL-1beta trigger loop which binds to IL-1 and inhibits in vitro responses. , 1999, Molecular immunology.

[24]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  T. Barrette,et al.  Probabilistic model of the human protein-protein interaction network , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  K. Bost,et al.  Similarity between the corticotropin (ACTH) receptor and a peptide encoded by an RNA that is complementary to ACTH mRNA. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  R. Root-Bernstein,et al.  Augmentation of aortic ring contractions by angiotensin II antisense peptide. , 1998, Hypertension.

[29]  P. Bierman,et al.  Immune dysfunction despite high levels of immunoregulatory cytokine gene expression in autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplanted non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. , 2000, Experimental hematology.

[30]  Narmada Thanki,et al.  CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: organization, cooperativity and mapping in a bottom-up Systems Biology approach , 2005, Physical biology.

[32]  James Lewis,et al.  Data and text mining Text similarity : an alternative way to search MEDLINE , 2006 .

[33]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[34]  Hui Lu,et al.  Correlation between gene expression profiles and protein-protein interactions within and across genomes , 2005, Bioinform..

[35]  M. Poo,et al.  Plexins Are a Large Family of Receptors for Transmembrane, Secreted, and GPI-Anchored Semaphorins in Vertebrates , 1999, Cell.

[36]  B. Rost,et al.  Predicted protein–protein interaction sites from local sequence information , 2003, FEBS letters.

[37]  M. Stella,et al.  Cross-talk between the proto-oncogenes Met and Ron , 2000, Oncogene.

[38]  R. Root-Bernstein,et al.  Molecular complementarity I: the complementarity theory of the origin and evolution of life. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  C. Goodman,et al.  Plexin A Is a Neuronal Semaphorin Receptor that Controls Axon Guidance , 1998, Cell.

[40]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting protein–protein recognition sites , 2002, Proteins.

[41]  J. Felsenstein An alternating least squares approach to inferring phylogenies from pairwise distances. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[42]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[43]  R. Kalb,et al.  Plexin-Neuropilin-1 Complexes Form Functional Semaphorin-3A Receptors , 1999, Cell.

[44]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray data , 2002, Bioinform..

[46]  P. Chomczyński,et al.  Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. , 1987, Analytical biochemistry.

[47]  A. Valencia,et al.  Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[48]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Identification of conserved protein complexes based on a model of protein network evolution , 2007, Bioinform..

[49]  Leo Kinarsky,et al.  Identification of functional cell adhesion molecules with a potential role in metastasis by a combination of in vivo phage display and in silico analysis. , 2007, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[50]  Qingfeng Chen,et al.  Mining frequent patterns for AMP-activated protein kinase regulation on skeletal muscle , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[51]  S. Jones,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  Carlos F. Barbas,et al.  Phage display: a Laboratory manual , 2014 .

[53]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Character and evolution of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Physical biology.

[54]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  αv Integrins as receptors for tumor targeting by circulating ligands , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  Mario Soberón,et al.  Hydropathic Complementarity Determines Interaction of Epitope 869HITDTNNK876 in Manduca sexta Bt-R1 Receptor with Loop 2 of Domain II ofBacillus thuringiensis Cry1A Toxins* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part I. Experimental Techniques and Databases , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..