The Importance of a Visual Horizon for Distance Judgments under Severely Degraded Vision

In two experiments we examined the role of visual horizon information on absolute egocentric distance judgments to on-ground targets. Sedgwick [1983, in Human and Machine Vision (New York: Academic Press) pp 425–458] suggested that the visual system may utilize the angle of declination from a horizontal line of sight to the target location (horizon–distance relation) to determine absolute distances on infinite ground surfaces. While studies have supported this hypothesis, less is known about the specific cues (vestibular, visual) used to determine horizontal line of sight. We investigated this question by requiring observers to judge distances under degraded vision given an unaltered or raised visual horizon. The results suggest that visual horizon information does influence perception of absolute distances as evident through two different action-based measures: walking or throwing without vision to previously viewed targets. Distances were judged as shorter in the presence of a raised visual horizon. The results are discussed with respect to how the visual system accurately determines absolute distance to objects on a finite ground plane and for their implications for understanding space perception in low-vision individuals.

[1]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon , 2001, Nature.

[2]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Absolute Distance Perception to Locations off the Ground Plane , 2007, Perception.

[3]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  The linear perspective information in ground surface representation and distance judgment , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  J. Rieser,et al.  Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  D W Eby,et al.  A study of visually directed throwing in the presence of multiple distance cues , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[9]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  S S Fukusima,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[12]  H A Sedgwick,et al.  Distance perception mediated through nested contact relations among surfaces , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  H. Sedgwick.  Environment-Centered Representation of Spatial Layout: Available Visual Information from Texture and Perspective , 1983 .

[14]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments , 2005, TAP.

[15]  L. Matin,et al.  Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. Thomson.  Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[18]  C. R. Fox,et al.  Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity , 1989, Vision Research.

[19]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Intact spatial updating with severely degraded vision , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  H A Sedgwick,et al.  Distance perception across spatial discontinuities , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions , 1997 .

[22]  John J. Rieser,et al.  Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Rieser,et al.  Visual Perception and the Guidance of Locomotion without Vision to Previously Seen Targets , 1990, Perception.

[26]  L. Matin,et al.  Light and dark adaptation of visually perceived eye level controlled by visual pitch , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Distance Perception and the Visual Horizon in Head-Mounted Displays , 2005, TAP.

[28]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Throwing vs. walking as indicators of distance perception in real and virtual environments , 2004, APGV '04.

[29]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Background surface and horizon effects in the perception of relative size and distance , 2010, Visual cognition.

[31]  R. Klein,et al.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  Gregory L. Goodrich,et al.  Change in Visual Perceptual Detection Distances for Low Vision Travelers as a Result of Dynamic Visual Assessment and Training , 2002 .