Radiomics in glioblastoma: current status, challenges and potential opportunities

Gliomas are tumors which develop in the brain, the most aggressive of which is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Despite extensive research to better understand the underlying biology of GBM and advancements in the treatment of this disease, it has an extremely poor prognosis. Poor outcomes in GBM are due to its molecular and clinical heterogeneity, as in other solid tumors. As imaging approaches have been taken to comprehensively characterize tumors, radiomics has emerged as the concept of extracting quantitative radiologic features and drawing associations with clinical outcomes. Radiomics has the potential to improve the predictive ability of radiological datasets. Tumor radiographs are segmented through manual, semi-automated or fully-automated procedures. Segmentation is followed by feature extraction from the tumor volume. Data analysis and predictive modeling are used to relate image-derived features with clinical outcomes. Substantial progress has already been made in solving many of the technical hurdles inherent in the radiomics process. Advances in sequencing, gene expression profiling and machine learning have increased the resolution of datasets and improved the sensitivity and specificity of computational methods used to analyze them. Numerous logistical, computational and clinical challenges remain to unlocking the full potential of the radiomics approach. To make the approach useful in clinical practice, improved statistical models are needed which relate GBM imaging features with patient outcomes with high specificity/sensitivity. More studies correlating radiomic features with disease outcomes and molecular attributes are also needed to illuminate the tumor biology which gives rise to imaging features and underlie response to therapy.

[1]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Imaging genomics in cancer research: limitations and promises. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Lei Xing,et al.  Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Development and Independent Validation on the Basis of Multiregion and Quantitative Analysis of MR Images. , 2016, Radiology.

[3]  Sébastien Jodogne,et al.  FDG PET/CT texture analysis for predicting the outcome of lung cancer treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  Phuong-Anh T. Duong,et al.  The Value of Imaging Part II: Value beyond Image Interpretation. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[5]  Juan J. Martinez,et al.  Evaluation of tumor-derived MRI-texture features for discrimination of molecular subtypes and prediction of 12-month survival status in glioblastoma. , 2015, Medical physics.

[6]  Ganesh Rao,et al.  Associating spatial diversity features of radiologically defined tumor habitats with epidermal growth factor receptor driver status and 12-month survival in glioblastoma: methods and preliminary investigation , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.

[7]  Juan J. Martinez,et al.  Spatial Habitat Features Derived from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Are Associated with Molecular Subtype and 12-Month Survival Status in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  Mark Muzi,et al.  Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Benjamin Haibe-Kains,et al.  Radiomic feature clusters and Prognostic Signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Alexander Wong,et al.  Lung Nodule Classification Using Deep Features in CT Images , 2015, 2015 12th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision.

[11]  R. Colen,et al.  Imaging Genomics of Glioblastoma: Biology, Biomarkers, and Breakthroughs , 2015, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[12]  H. Hricak,et al.  Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores , 2015, European Radiology.

[13]  Rivka R Colen,et al.  Imaging Genomics in Gliomas. , 2015, Cancer journal.

[14]  H. Wheeler,et al.  Molecular Heterogeneity in Glioblastoma: Potential Clinical Implications , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[15]  M. Hatt,et al.  18F-FDG PET Uptake Characterization Through Texture Analysis: Investigating the Complementary Nature of Heterogeneity and Functional Tumor Volume in a Multi–Cancer Site Patient Cohort , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  O. van Gómez López,et al.  Heterogeneity in [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography of Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Its Relationship to Metabolic Parameters and Pathologic Staging , 2014, Molecular imaging.

[17]  A. Markoe,et al.  Volumetric spectroscopic imaging of glioblastoma multiforme radiation treatment volumes. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Lawrence O. Hall,et al.  Exploring Brain Tumor Heterogeneity for Survival Time Prediction , 2014, 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[19]  P. Lambin,et al.  Robust Radiomics Feature Quantification Using Semiautomatic Volumetric Segmentation , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  Test–Retest Reproducibility Analysis of Lung CT Image Features , 2014, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[21]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[22]  Max Wintermark,et al.  Imaging genomic mapping of an invasive MRI phenotype predicts patient outcome and metabolic dysfunction: a TCGA glioma phenotype research group project , 2014, BMC Medical Genomics.

[23]  Shawn M. Gillespie,et al.  Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma , 2014, Science.

[24]  S. Plevritis,et al.  Glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory radiogenomic analysis by using quantitative image features. , 2014, Radiology.

[25]  S. Bauer,et al.  Multi-Modal Glioblastoma Segmentation: Man versus Machine , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  Maciej A Mazurowski,et al.  A fully automatic extraction of magnetic resonance image features in glioblastoma patients. , 2014, Medical physics.

[27]  Tobias Gass,et al.  Detection and correction of inconsistency-based errors in non-rigid registration , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[28]  Scott N. Hwang,et al.  Outcome prediction in patients with glioblastoma by using imaging, clinical, and genomic biomarkers: focus on the nonenhancing component of the tumor. , 2014, Radiology.

[29]  R. Gillies,et al.  Radiologically defined ecological dynamics and clinical outcomes in glioblastoma multiforme: preliminary results. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[30]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Paediatric and adult glioblastoma: multiform (epi)genomic culprits emerge , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[31]  F. Dhermain,et al.  Radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas: current standards and new concepts, innovations in imaging and radiotherapy, and new therapeutic approaches , 2014, Chinese journal of cancer.

[32]  Neema Jamshidi,et al.  Illuminating radiogenomic characteristics of glioblastoma multiforme through integration of MR imaging, messenger RNA expression, and DNA copy number variation. , 2013, Radiology.

[33]  D. Haussler,et al.  The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma , 2013, Cell.

[34]  J. Rich,et al.  Genomics informs glioblastoma biology , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[35]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[36]  Rivka R Colen,et al.  Imaging genomic mapping in glioblastoma. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[37]  M. Hatt,et al.  Robustness of intratumour 18F-FDG PET uptake heterogeneity quantification for therapy response prediction in oesophageal carcinoma , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[38]  William D. Dunn,et al.  MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set. , 2013, Radiology.

[39]  T. Nihashi,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of PET for Recurrent Glioma Diagnosis: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[40]  Benjamin M Ellingson,et al.  Identifying the mesenchymal molecular subtype of glioblastoma using quantitative volumetric analysis of anatomic magnetic resonance images. , 2013, Neuro-oncology.

[41]  David Gutman,et al.  Genomic mapping and survival prediction in glioblastoma: molecular subclassification strengthened by hemodynamic imaging biomarkers. , 2013, Radiology.

[42]  Punit Sharma,et al.  18F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrence in patients with glioma: prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[43]  V. P. Collins,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[45]  D. D. Maki,et al.  Radiogenomic analysis of breast cancer using MRI: a preliminary study to define the landscape. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[47]  L. Carroll,et al.  New Frontiers in the Design and Synthesis of Imaging Probes for PET Oncology: Current Challenges and Future Directions , 2012, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[48]  Didier Frappaz,et al.  Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[49]  G. Barnett,et al.  Molecular targeted therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: current challenges and future directions , 2012, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[50]  T. Cloughesy,et al.  Relationship between Tumor Enhancement, Edema, IDH1 Mutational Status, MGMT Promoter Methylation, and Survival in Glioblastoma , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[51]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[52]  C. Davatzikos,et al.  Survival Analysis of Patients with High-Grade Gliomas Based on Data Mining of Imaging Variables , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[53]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Computer-Aided Staging of Lymphoma Patients With FDG PET/CT Imaging Based on Textural Information , 2012, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[54]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[55]  Benjamin M Ellingson,et al.  Nonlinear registration of diffusion‐weighted images improves clinical sensitivity of functional diffusion maps in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[56]  W. Oyen,et al.  Early identification of antigen-specific immune responses in vivo by [18F]-labeled 3′-fluoro-3′-deoxy-thymidine ([18F]FLT) PET imaging , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  J. Tonn,et al.  Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[58]  Rajashree Dash,et al.  Feature selection in gene expression data using principal component analysis and rough set theory. , 2011, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[59]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Patients with IDH 1 wild type anaplastic astrocytomas exhibit worse prognosis than IDH 1-mutated glioblastomas , and IDH 1 mutation status accounts for the unfavorable prognostic effect of higher age : implications for classification of gliomas , 2010 .

[60]  J. Lee,et al.  Segmentation of positron emission tomography images: some recommendations for target delineation in radiation oncology. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[61]  A. Kassner,et al.  Texture Analysis: A Review of Neurologic MR Imaging Applications , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[62]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[63]  Guang Li,et al.  Volumetric Image Registration of Multi-modality Images of CT, MRI and PET , 2010 .

[64]  Li Bai,et al.  The influence of intensity standardization on medical image registration , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[65]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[66]  Hugo D. Critchley,et al.  Three-dimensional textural analysis of brain images reveals distributed grey-matter abnormalities in schizophrenia , 2010, European Radiology.

[67]  P. Kleihues,et al.  IDH1 Mutations as Molecular Signature and Predictive Factor of Secondary Glioblastomas , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[68]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[69]  Kristina Potocki,et al.  The differences of water diffusion between brain tissue infiltrated by tumor and peritumoral vasogenic edema. , 2009, Clinical imaging.

[70]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[71]  Kristin R. Swanson,et al.  Complementary but Distinct Roles for MRI and 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET in the Assessment of Human Glioblastomas , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[72]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[73]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of various strategies for 18F-FET PET-guided delineation of target volumes in high-grade glioma patients , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[74]  Akinobu Shimizu,et al.  Medical image analysis of 3D CT images based on extension of Haralick texture features , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[75]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[76]  Johan Wennerberg,et al.  2-Deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose uptake and correlation to intratumoral heterogeneity. , 2007, Anticancer research.

[77]  C. Marosi,et al.  [11C] Methionine and [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the follow-up of glioblastoma multiforme , 2007, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[78]  Akinobu Shimizu,et al.  3D extension of Haralick texture features for medical image analysis , 2007 .

[79]  A Kowalski,et al.  Use of MR spectroscopy and functional imaging in the treatment planning of gliomas. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[80]  E. Kim,et al.  FDG PET/CT , 2007 .

[81]  Wei Chen,et al.  18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[82]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  MR imaging correlates of survival in patients with high-grade gliomas. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[83]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Coregistration of Structural and Functional Images , 2005 .

[84]  Martin Styner,et al.  Automatic method to assess local CT-MR imaging registration accuracy on images of the head. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[85]  S. Ametamey,et al.  Assessment of hypoxia and perfusion in human brain tumors using PET with 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 15O-H2O. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[86]  John A Carrino,et al.  Understanding DICOM and IHE. , 2003, Seminars in roentgenology.

[87]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[88]  Michael L. Bittner,et al.  Strong Feature Sets from Small Samples , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[89]  Z L Gokaslan,et al.  A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[90]  J. Bruner,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of primary brain and CNS tumors: results from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, 1990-1994. , 1999, Neuro-oncology.

[91]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Improving Reliability and Performance of Voxel-Based Registration by Coincidence Thresholding and Volume Clipping , 1999 .

[92]  Steven C. Horii,et al.  Review: Understanding and Using DICOM, the Data Interchange Standard for Biomedical Imaging , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[93]  C. Moorehead All rights reserved , 1997 .

[94]  C. Sommer,et al.  Characterization of genomic alterations associated with glioma progression by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1996, Oncogene.

[95]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[96]  D. Louis,et al.  Comparative Study of p53 Gene and Protein Alterations in Human Astrocytic Tumors , 1993, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[97]  M. Kramer Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks , 1991 .

[98]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis , 1990, Cell.

[99]  S B Green,et al.  Randomized trial of three chemotherapy regimens and two radiotherapy regimens and two radiotherapy regimens in postoperative treatment of malignant glioma. Brain Tumor Cooperative Group Trial 8001. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[100]  T. Guthrie,et al.  Prostate cancer. , 2020, American family physician.

[101]  B A Kall,et al.  Imaging-based stereotaxic serial biopsies in untreated intracranial glial neoplasms. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[102]  S. Wold,et al.  The Collinearity Problem in Linear Regression. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Generalized Inverses , 1984 .

[103]  I. Fidler,et al.  Tumor heterogeneity and the biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. , 1978, Cancer research.

[104]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[105]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .